Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 422–425

Rare variation in course and affluence of internal iliac vein due to its anatomical and surgical significance

  • T. M. Cardinot
  • A. H. B. M. Aragão
  • M. A. Babinski
  • L. A. Favorito
Anatomic Variations


During regular dissection of the retroperitoneal region, three uncommon anatomical variations of the internal iliac veins were found on dissected specimens: in the first case, the internal iliac veins converge forming a common trunk draining into the left external iliac vein. In the other two cases, the internal iliac vein crosses the median plane and flows into the contralateral common iliac vein. These anomalies result from a persistence of the embryonic inferior branch of the cardinal vein and are important to be known for they may be undetected or may not appear in imaging. These data have implications for both pelvic surgeons and anatomists who manipulated this anatomical area.


Internal iliac vein Regional anatomy Vascular anatomy Veins variations 


  1. 1.
    Allgayer B, Reiser M, Ries G, Feuerbach S (1981) Computed tomographic demonstration of venous thrombosis of different etiologies. Eur J Radiol 1:204–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babaian RJ, Johnson DE (1979) Major venous anomalies complicating retroperitoneal surgery. Southern Med J 72:1254–1258Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldridge ED Jr, Canos AJ (1987) Venous anomalies encountered in aortoiliac surgery. Arch Surg 122:1184–1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergman RA, Thompson SA, Afifi AK, Saadeh FA (1988) Compendium of Human Anatomic Variation. Urban & Schwarzenberg, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards WR (1996) Hysterectomy, massive transfusion and packing to control haemorrhage from pelvic veins in the course of bilateral oophorectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36:82–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM (1990) Structures at risk from medially placed acetabular screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:509–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nezhat C, Childers J, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS (1997) Major retroperitoneal vascular injury during laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod Mar 12:480–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sürücü HS, Erbil KM, Tastan C¸ Yener N (2001) Anomalous veins of the retroperitoneum: clinical considerations. Surg Radiol Anat 23:443–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanagho EA, McAninch JW, Smith MD (2000) General Urology, 15th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ (1995) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 1598–1599Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Cardinot
    • 1
  • A. H. B. M. Aragão
    • 1
  • M. A. Babinski
    • 2
  • L. A. Favorito
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Biology InstituteRio de Janeiro State UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Morphology, Biomedical InstituteFluminense Federal UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations