Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 129–134

Atherosclerosis in the vertebral artery: an intrinsic risk factor in the use of spinal manipulation?

  • Barbara Cagnie
  • Erik Barbaix
  • Elke Vinck
  • Katharina D’Herde
  • Dirk Cambier
Original Article

Abstract

The presence of atherosclerotic plaques and their influence on the vertebral artery is of clinical importance within the scope of spinal manipulation. Manipulation may stimulate the development of atherosclerotic plaques, could detach an embolus with ensuing infarction, injure the endothelium or may directly cause a dissection in the presence of atherosclerotic plaques. In order to identify the sites and frequency of atherosclerotic plaques and to determine its relation to the tortuous course of the vertebral artery, a cadaveric study was performed. The vertebral arteries of 57 human cadavers were studied. The vertebral artery was virtually divided into four segments: the pre-vertebral (V1), the vertebral (V2), the atlanto-axial (V3), and the intracranial segment (V4). Abnormalities in the origin and course of the vertebral artery were noted, along with any associated osseous, or cartilaginous anomalies in the neck. After dissection, the artery was opened and macroscopically screened for the presence of atherosclerotic plaques. In 22.8% of the cases, no atherosclerotic plaques were present. In 35.1% of the cases, the atherosclerotic plaques were unilateral, of which 60.0% was on the left side, 40.0% on the right side, and in 42.1%, the occurrence was bilateral. Atherosclerotic plaques were significantly more present in the V3 segment than in the V1 (0.007) and V2 segment (0.049). In the V1 (P=0.008) and V2 segment (P=0.002), there was a correlation between a tortuous course of the vessel and the occurrence of atherosclerotic plaques. In individuals with marked atherosclerotic disease, stretching and compression effects of rotational manipulative techniques on atherosclerotic vessels impose a further risk factor for vertebrobasilar insufficiency. As direct evidence of atherosclerotic plaques are rarely available, therapists should avoid manipulative techniques at all levels of the cervical spine in the presence of any indirect sign of atherosclerotic disease or in the presence of calcified arterial walls or tortuosities of the vessels visible on routinely available X-ray images of the cervical or thoracic spine. It is strongly recommended, that if any doubt exists about the nature of a clinical presentation, vigorous manual procedures should be avoided until either the diagnosis is definitive or gentle manual therapy has proven effective.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis Vertebral artery Manipulative therapy Anatomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Abd-el Bary T, Dujnovny M, Ausman J (1995) Microsurgical anatomy of the atlantal part of the vertebral artery. Surg Neurol 44(4):392–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adachi B (1928) Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Bd I. Maruzen, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cagnie B, Barbaix E, Vinck E, D’Herde K, Cambier D (2005) Extrinsic risk factors for turbulent blood flow in the vertebral artery: anatomical observations of the transverse foramina. Surg Radiol Anat 27:312–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Citow J, Macdonald R (1999) Posterior decompression of the vertebral artery narrowed by cervical osteophyte: case report. Surg Neurol 51:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cloud G, Markus H (2003) Diagnosis and management of vertebral artery stenosis. Q J Med 96:27–34Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ernst E (2002) Manipulation of the cervical spine: a systematic review of case reports of serious adverse events, 1995–2001. Med J Aust 176:376–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher C, Gore I, Okabe N, White P (1965) Atherosclerosis of the carotid and vertebral arteries—extracranial and intracranial. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 24:455–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hutchinson E, Yates P (1956) The cervical portion of the vertebral artery. A clinico-pathological study. Brain 79:319–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutchinson E, Yates P (1957) Carotico-vertebral stenosis. Lancet 1:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Licht PB, Christensen HW, Hojgaard P, Marving J (1998) Vertebral artery flow and spinal manipulation: a randomized, controlled and observer-blinded study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 21:141–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin M, Whisnant J, Sayre G (1960) Occlusive vascular disease in the extracranial cerebral circulation. Arch Neurol 3:530–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Min W, Kim Y, Kim J, Park S, Suh C (1999) Atherothrombotic cerebellar infarction: vascular lesion-MRI correlation of 31 cases. Stroke 30:2376–2381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchell J (2002) Vertebral artery atherosclerosis: a risk factor in the use of manipulative therapy? Physiother Res Int 7:122–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell J (2004) Differences between left and right suboccipital and intracranial vertebral artery dimensions: an influence on blood flow to the hindbrain? Physiother Res Int 9:85–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell J, McKay A (1995) Comparison of left and right vertebral artery intracranial diameters. Anat Rec 242:350–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravensbergen J, Ravensbergen JW, Krijger JKB, Hillen B, Hoogstraten HW (1998) Localizing role of hemodynamics in atherosclerosis in several human vertebrobasilar junction geometries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 18:706–716Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rivett D, Sharples K, Milburn P (1999) Effect of premanipulative tests on vertebral artery and internal carotid artery blood flow: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22:368–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross R (1999) Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340:115–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakata N, Takebayashi S, KojimaM, Masawa N, Suzuki K, Takatama M, Kusumi Y, Mitsumata M (2001) Different roles of arteriosclerosis in the rupture of intracranial dissecting aneurysms. Histopathology 38:325–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schievink W (2001) Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 344:898–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shin H, Yoo K, Chang H, Caplan L (1999) Bilateral intracranial vertebral artery disease in the New England Medical Center, Posterior Circulation Registry. Arch Neurol 56:1353–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Solberg L, McGarry P, Moossy J, Strong J, Tejada C, Loken A (1968) Severity of atherosclerosis in cerebral arteries, coronary arteries and aortas. Ann N Y Acad Sci 149:956–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stein B, McCormick W, Rodriquez J, Taveras J (1961) Incidence and significance of occlusive vascular disease of the extracranial arteries as demonstrated by post-mortem angiography. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 86:60–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thiel H (1991) Gross morphology and pathoanatomy of the vertebral arteries. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:133–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Roy P, Barbaix E, Clarys JP (2001) Functional anatomy of the cervical spine. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R (eds) The degenerative cervical spine. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    http://www.vesalius.com consulted on march 26, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Cagnie
    • 1
  • Erik Barbaix
    • 2
  • Elke Vinck
    • 1
  • Katharina D’Herde
    • 2
  • Dirk Cambier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and PhysiotherapyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical PhysicsGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations