Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs
- 545 Downloads
Panoramic radiographs are routinely used in the dental office for various diagnostic purposes. This study aimed to evaluate the visibility of neurovascular structures in the mandibular interforaminal region on such radiographs. Panoramic radiographs were obtained with a Cranex Tome (Soredex) from 545 consecutive patients using a standard exposure and positioning protocol. For visibility scoring of neurovascular structures, a four-point rating scale was used. The mandibular canal and the mental foramen could be observed in the majority of the cases with good visibility. The lingual foramen was visualized in 71% of the cases, with good visibility in 12%. An incisive canal was identified in 15% of the images, with good visibility in only 1%. An anatomical variation to be considered is the anterior looping of the mental nerve (in 11% of images). Panoramic radiographs can be used for visualization of the mental foramen and a potential anterior looping but not for locating the mandibular incisive canal. To verify its existence for preoperative planning purposes, cross-sectional imaging modalities (HR-CT or spiral tomography) should be preferred.
KeywordsIncisive nerve Panoramic radiography Mandible Osseointegration Preoperative planning
R.J. is a postdoctoral researcher of the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO Flanders, Belgium). D.S. is holder of the P.I. Bränemark Chair in Osseointegration.
- 3.Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 4:156–172Google Scholar
- 4.Casselman JW, Quirynen M, Lemahieu SF, Baert AL, Bonte J (1988) Computed tomography in the determination of anatomical landmarks in the perspective of enosseous oral implant installation. J Head Neck Pathol 7:255–264Google Scholar
- 5.De Freitas V, Maderia MC, Toledo, Filho JL, Chagas CF (1979) Absence of mental foramen in dry human mandible. Acta Anat 104:353–355Google Scholar
- 8.Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D (1998) Radiographic planning and assessment of endosseous oral implants. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–40, 95–102Google Scholar
- 12.Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B (1995) Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 6:96–103Google Scholar
- 17.Quirynen M, Lamoral Y, Dekeyser C, Peene P, van Steenberghe D, Bonte J, Baert AL (1990) The CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7:45–50Google Scholar
- 18.Rosenquist B (1996) Is there an anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve? Int J Periodont Restor Dent 16:40–45Google Scholar
- 20.Serman NJ (1987) Differentiation of double mental foramina from extra bony coursing of the incisive branch of the mandibular nerve: an anatomic study. Refuat Hashinayim 5:20–22Google Scholar
- 22.Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella RA (1994) A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerised tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9:455–460Google Scholar