Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 198–201 | Cite as

Where exactly is the deep inguinal ring in patients with inguinal hernias?

  • P. ConaghanEmail author
  • D. Hassanally
  • M. Griffin
  • C. Ingham Clark
Original Article


It is difficult to distinguish direct from indirect inguinal hernias on clinical examination. This study attempted to determine an anatomical basis for this finding. Fifty adult patients with primary inguinal hernias were assessed. The position of the deep inguinal ring (DIR) was estimated from the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic tubercle (PT) pre-operatively and then the actual distance from these landmarks was measured intra-operatively. The DIR was actually located at a mean of 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26–56%) of the way along the inguinal ligament from the PT towards the ASIS (regression slope 1.203; 95% CI 1.141–1.127), compared with the 50% which would be expected from traditional clinical methodology. The DIR was actually found at a mean of 51% (95% CI 33–69%) of the way along a line from the pubic symphysis to the ASIS (regression slope 1.421; 95% CI 1.343–1.499). Pre-operative estimates of the position of the DIR are not accurate measures of its true position in patients with inguinal hernias. Clinical examination of inguinal hernias cannot rely on a constant position of the DIR to determine whether a hernia is direct or indirect.


Inguinal hernia Anatomy Clinical landmarks 


  1. 1.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I: 307–310Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borley NR (1997) Inguinal region—soft tissues 1. In: Clinical surface anatomy. Manson Publishing, London, pp 64–65Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Browse NL (1997) Abdominal herniae. In: An introduction to the symptoms and signs of surgical disease, 3rd edition. Arnold, London, pp 321–325Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell IR (1988) What is the surface marking of the deep inguinal ring? J R Coll Surg Edinb 33: 247–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis H, Calne RY, Watson CJE (1998) Hernia. In: Lecture notes on general surgery, 9th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 234–236Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis H, Dussek JE (1995) Surface anatomy. In: Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 1919Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McMinn RMH (1994) Last’s anatomy, 9th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 304, 154Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 14: 1-2Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parnis SJ, Roberts JP, Hutson JM (1997) Anatomical landmarks of the inguinal canal in prepubescent children. Aust N Z J Surg 67: 335–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ralphs DN, Brain AJ, Grundy DJ, Hobsley M (1980) How accurately can direct and indirect inguinal hernias be distinguished? BMJ 280: 1039–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salmons S (1995) Muscles of the abdomen. In: Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 829Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Talley, O’Connor (1992) The gastrointestinal system. In: Clinical examination, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 167–168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Conaghan
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Hassanally
    • 1
  • M. Griffin
    • 2
  • C. Ingham Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Jenner BuildingWhittington HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Population Science and Primary CareRoyal Free and University College Medical SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations