Irrigation distribution uniformity analysis on a lateral-move irrigation system

  • Lessandro Coll Faria
  • Bernardo Gomes NörenbergEmail author
  • Alberto Colombo
  • Michael D. Dukes
  • Luis Carlos Timm
  • Samuel Beskow
  • Tamara Leitzke Caldeira
Original Paper


Probability distribution functions (PDF) have been used for decades to model the applied water depth by irrigation equipment; however, there are few studies that evaluate the PDF goodness-of-fit to mechanical lateral-move irrigation system water application, especially with oscillating plate sprinklers. The objectives of this study with a lateral-move irrigation system in the field were as follows: (1) to evaluate the normal, uniform, Weibull, gamma and logistic PDFs’ goodness-of-fit to represent the applied water depth ; (2) to evaluate the influence of wind on the coefficient of variation (CV) of the applied water depth; (3) to evaluate the relationship of the distribution coefficient (H), the availability factor (F), the average deficit (Da) and the water storage efficiency (E) as a function of wind speed. Twenty-nine in-field tests were carried out at the Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa). The PDFs’ goodness-of-fit to the applied water depths by the irrigation system was based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test at a 5% significance level. The normal, uniform, gamma, Weibull and logistic PDFs fitted 21, 8, 19, 26, and 25 of the 29 in-field tests, respectively; however, application of the Weibull PDF is complicated and the normal distribution is suggested instead. The logistic PDF had good fit and warrants further study. In addition, a negative linear relationship (R2 = 0.73) was observed between the wind speed and the coefficient of variation of the applied water depth by the irrigation system, as well as the distribution coefficient (H), the availability factor (F), and water storage efficiency (E), while the average deficit (Da) showed a positive linear relationship with the wind speed.



This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 479792/20135. The authors wish to thank the Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) for sharing the site for field test in the Campo Experimental de Terras Baixas (ETB), Pelotas-RS.


  1. Anyoji H, Wu IP (1994) Normal distribution water application for drip irrigation schedules. Trans ASAE 37(1):159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhry FH (1976) Sprinkler uniformity measures and skewness. J Irrig Drain Div 106(4):425–433. Google Scholar
  3. Christiansen JE (1942) Irrigation by sprinkling. University of California, Berkeley, p 124 (Bulletin, 670) Google Scholar
  4. Clark GA, Srinivas K, Rogers DH, Stratton R, Martin VL (2003) Measured and simulated uniformity of low drift nozzle sprinklers. Trans ASAE 46(2):321–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Criddle WD, Davis S, Pair CH, Shuckely DG (1956) Methods for evaluation irrigation systems. USDA, Washington, p 24 (Agricultural Handbook, 82) Google Scholar
  6. Dukes MD (2006) Effect of wind speed and pressure on linear move irrigation system uniformity. Appl Eng Agric 22(4):541–548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faci JM, Salvador R, Playán E, Sourell H (2001) Comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(4):224–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faria LC, Beskow S, Colombo A, Nörenberg BG, Rettore Neto O, Simões MC (2016) Influence of the wind on water application uniformity of a mechanical lateral move irrigation equipment using rotating plate sprinklers. Ciência Rural 46(1):83–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart WE (1961) Overhead irrigation pattern parameters. Agric Eng 24(7):354–355Google Scholar
  10. Hart WE, Reynolds WN (1965) Analytical design of sprinkler systems. Trans ASAE 8(1):83–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heermann DF, Duke HR, Serafim AM, Dawson LJ (1992) Distribution functions to represent center-pivot water distribution. Trans ASAE 32(5):1465–1472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. International Organization for Standardization—ISO (2009) ISO 11545: agricultural irrigation equipment—Centre-pivot and moving lateral irrigation machines with sprayer or sprinkler nozzles—determination of uniformity of water distribution. Switzerland. p 16Google Scholar
  13. Karmeli D (1978) Estimating sprinkler distribution patterns using linear regression. Trans ASAE 21(4):682–686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keller J, Bliesner RD (1990) Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. AnaviBook/Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mantovani EC, Faccioli GC, Leal BG, Costa LC, Soares AA, Freitas PSL (2010) Determining the deficit coefficient as a function of irrigation depth and distribution uniformity. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 14(30):253–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naghettini M, Pinto EJA (2007) Hidrologia estatística. CPRM, Belo Horizonte, p 552Google Scholar
  17. Nörenberg BG, Faria LC, Neto OR, Beskow S, Colombo A, Timm LC, Manke EB (2017) Wind speed and direction on water application uniformity of a mechanical lateral-move irrigation system. Appl Eng Agric 33(4):543–549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smesrud JK, Selker JA (2001) Analytical solution for normal irrigation distribution parameters. J Irrig Drain Eng v 127:45–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1993) Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarjuelo JM, Montero J, Carrión PA, Honrubia FT, Calvo MA (1999) Irrigation uniformity with medium size sprinklers part II: Influence of wind and other factors on water distribution. Trans ASAE 42(3):677–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Warrick AW (1983) Interrelationships of irrigation uniformity terms. J Irrig Drain Eng 109:317–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Technological Development/Water Resources EngineeringFederal University of PelotasPelotasBrazil
  2. 2.Engineering DepartmentFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Center for Landscape Conservation and EcologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Rural Engineering/Eliseu Maciel Agronomy CollegeFederal University of PelotasCapão do LeãoBrazil
  5. 5.Engineering Center/Civil EngineeringFederal University of PelotasPelotasBrazil

Personalised recommendations