Determining a robust indirect measurement of leaf area index in California vineyards for validating remote sensing-based retrievals
- 85 Downloads
Accurate ground-based measurements of leaf area index (LAI) are needed for validation of remote sensing-based retrievals used in models estimating plant water use, stress, carbon assimilation and other land surface processes. Several methods for indirect LAI estimation with the Plant Canopy Analyzer (PCA, LAI-2200C, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) were evaluated using destructive (direct) leaf area measurements in three split-canopy vineyards and one double-vertical vineyard in California, as part of the Grape Remote sensing and Atmospheric Profile and Evapotranspiration eXperiment (GRAPEX). A method with the sensor facing the canopy, and four readings occurring evenly across the interrow space, had a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.87 and relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 16%, when compared to direct LAI measurements via destructive sampling. A previously used method, with the sensor facing down-row, showed lower correlation to direct LAI (R2 = 0.75, RRMSE = 33%) and underestimation which was mitigated by removing the outer sensor rings from analysis. A PCA method is recommended for rapid and accurate LAI estimation in split-canopy vineyards, though local calibration may be required. The method was tested within small units of ground surface area, which compliments high-resolution datasets such as those acquired by small unmanned aerial vehicles. The utility of ground-based LAI measurements to validate remote sensing products is discussed.
We would like to thank the staff of Viticulture, Chemistry, and Enology Division of E. & J. Gallo Winery for the collection and processing of field data during GRAPEX IOPs. This project would not have been possible without the cooperation of vineyard staff and managers including Ernie Dosio, Joe Larranaga, Jose Botello, and Amanpreek Virk, for logistical support of GRAPEX field and research activities. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52:1–7Google Scholar
- Garrigues S, Shabanov NV, Swanson K et al (2008) Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of Leaf Area Index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands. Agric For Meteorol 148:1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grantz D, Williams L (1993) An empirical protocol for indirect measurement of leaf area index in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). HortScience 28:777–779Google Scholar
- Johnson LF (2003) Temporal stability of an NDVI-LAI relationship in a Napa Valley vineyard. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2003.tb00258.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson LF, Pierce LL (2004) Indirect measurement of leaf area index in California North Coast vineyards. HortScience 39:236–238Google Scholar
- LI-COR (2016) LAI-2200C Plant Canopy Analyzer instruction manual. LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USAGoogle Scholar
- Ollat N, Fermaud M, Tandonnet JP, Neveux M (1998) Evaluation of an indirect method for leaf area index determination in the vineyard: combined effects of cultivar, year and training system. Vitis 37:73–78Google Scholar
- Watson DJ (1947) Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. Ann Bot 41:41–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1953.tb02364.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Welles JM, Norman JM (1991) Instrument for indirect measurement of canopy architecture. Agron J 83:818. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050009x CrossRefGoogle Scholar