Advertisement

Impact of hydrodynamics on clay particle deposition and biofilm development in a labyrinth-channel dripper

  • Nassim Ait-Mouheb
  • Juliette Schillings
  • Jafar Al-Muhammad
  • Ryad Bendoula
  • Séverine Tomas
  • Muriel Amielh
  • Fabien Anselmet
Original Paper
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

To better understand the physical and biological clogging in drip-irrigation, a study was conducted on the impacts of hydrodynamic conditions on clay particle deposition and biofilm development in drippers using an optical method. A transparent milli-fluidic system composed of labyrinth channels was used to identify areas most susceptible to particle clogging using two different types of clay suspensions: sodium bentonite and kaolin. The impact of salt addition [(NaCl) = 200 mg L− 1] on the clay deposition was also analyzed. Biofilm development was studied using the same methodology using a nutritive solution (chemical oxygen demand, COD = 200 mg L−1). In addition, fluid dynamics simulations were performed along the labyrinth channel to understand the effect of flow behaviour on the fouling. Computational fluid dynamics results show two types of flow topology: high velocity in the main flow (around 1 m s− 1) and low velocity in the vortex zones (less than 0.2 m s− 1) found in the channel corners. Using an optical method, kaolin deposition and biofilm growth in the dripper were observed to occur mainly in the inlet channel and initial vortex zones, which are characterized by lower mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy values. This part of the dripper can be considered as a bottleneck that amplifies the fouling phenomena and which should be optimized. With the addition of NaCl, kaolin particles tend to form bigger flocs. Therefore, more significant particle deposition is observed, but this is not the case of bentonite for which no fouling is observed along the dripper.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude for the financial support provided by the Water4Crops FP7 project, “Integrating bio-TWW with enhanced water use efficiency to support the Green Economy in EU and India”, No. 311933.

References

  1. Adin A, Sacks M (1991) Dripper clogging factors in wastewater irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng 117:813–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Muhammad J, Tomas S, Anselmet F (2016) Modeling a weak turbulent flow in a narrow and wavy channel: case of micro-irrigation. Irrig Sci 34(5):361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayars JE, Phene CJ, Hutmacher RB, Davis KR, Schoneman RA, Vail SS, Mead RM (1999) Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory. Agric Water Manag 42:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benouniche M, Kuper M, Hammani A, Boesveld H (2014) Making the user visible: analysing irrigation practices and farmers’ logic to explain actual drip irrigation performance. Irrig Sci 32:405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bounoua S, Tomas S, Labille J, Molle B, Granier J, Haldenwang P, Nuur Izzati S (2016) Understanding physical clogging in drip irrigation: in situ, in lab and numerical approaches. Irrig Sci 34:327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucks DA, Nakayama FS, Gilbert RG (1979) Trickle Irrigation water quality and prevention maintenance. Agric Water Manag 2:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camp CR, Lamm FR, Evans RG, Phene CJ (2000) Subsurface drip irrigation-past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the 4th decennial national irrigation symposium, Phoenix AZ, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, Nov 14–16, pp 363–372Google Scholar
  8. Chang HT, Rittmann BE, Amar D, Heim R, Ehlinger O, Lesty Y (1991) Biofilm detachment mechanisms in a liquid fluidized bed. Biotech Bioeng 38(5):499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuisset O (1979) Le potentiel électrocinétique des argiles: Influence de la Salinité. Bull de Liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 2407:104Google Scholar
  10. Ferziger JH, Peric M (2002) Computational methods for fluid dynamics, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (ISBN 3-540-42074-6) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamri S, Soric A, Tomas S, Molle B, Roche N (2014) Biofilm development in micro-irrigation emitters for wastewater reuse. Irrig Sci 32:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gouidera M, Bouzida J, Sayadi S, Montiel A (2009) Impact of orthophosphate addition on biofilm development in drinking water distribution systems. J Hazard Mater 167:1198–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habouzit F, Gaëlle G, Hamelin J, Steyer JP, Bernet N (2011) Influence of support material properties on the potential selection of Archaea during initial adhesion of a methanogenic consortium. Biores Technol 102:4054–4060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn H, Rciff H, Morgenroth E (2003) Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions. Biotech Bioeng 81(5):607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz S, Dosoretz C, Chen Y, Tarchitzky J (2014) Fouling formation and chemical control in drip irrigation systems using treated wastewater. Irrig Sci 32:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamm FR, Camp CR (2007) Subsurface drip irrigation. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production—design, operation and management, chap 13. Elsevier Publications, Amsterdam, pp 473–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Zhou B, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Pei Y, Shi Z (2013) Preliminary surface topographical characteristics of biofilms attached on drip irrigation emitters using reclaimed water. Irrig Sci 31(4):557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu HS, Li YK, Liu YZ, Yang PL, Ren SM, Wei RJ, Xu HB (2010) Flow characteristics in energy dissipation units of labyrinth path in the drip irrigation emitters with DPIV technology. J Hydrodyn Ser B 22(1):137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luckham PF, Rossi S (1990) The colloidal and rheological properties of bentonite suspensions. Adv Coll Interface Sci 82:43–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luquet D, Vidal A, Smith M, Dauzat J (2005) ‘More crop per drop’: how to make it acceptable for farmers? Agric Water Manag 76(2):108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakayama FS, Bucks DA (1981) Emitter clogging effects on trickle irrigation uniformity. Trans ASAE 24(1):77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakayama FS, Bucks DA (1991) Water quality in drip/trickle irrigation: a review. Irrig Sci 12(4):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niu W, Liu L, Chen X (2013) Influence of fine particle size and concentration on the clogging of labyrinth emitters. Irrig Sci 31(4):545–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira FC, Lavanholi R, Camargo AP, Frizzone JA, Ait Mouheb N, Tomas S, Molle B (2017) Influence of concentration and type of clay particles on dripper clogging. J Irrig Drain Syst Eng 6:184.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oron G, Shelef G, Turzynski B (1979) Trickle irrigation using treated wastewaters. J Irrig Drain Div 105:175–186Google Scholar
  26. Phene CJ, Bucks DA, Hutmacher RB, Ayars JE (1993) Research successes, applications and needs of subsurface drip irrigation, 15th Congress on Irrigation and Drainage. ICID-CIID, La Hague, 30 August–September, pp 249–267Google Scholar
  27. Pitts DJ, Haman DZ, Smajstrla AG (2003) Causes and prevention of emitter plugging in microirrigation systems. BUL258. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qian J, Horn H, Tarchitzky J, Chen Y, Katz S, Wagner M (2017) Water quality and daily temperature cycle affect biofilm formation in drip irrigation devices revealed by optical coherence tomography. Biofouling 33(3):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ravina I, Paz Z, Sofer A, Marcu A, Shisha A, Sagi G, Ravina E, Sofer Z, Marcu A et al (1992) Control of emitter clogging in drip irrigation with reclaimed wastewater. Irrig Sci 13(3):129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rittmann BE (1982) The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate. Biotech Bioeng 24(2):501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rizk N, Ait-Mouheb N, Bourrié G, Molle B, Roche N (2017) Parameters controlling chemical deposits in micro-irrigation with treated wastewater. J Water Supply Res T 66(8):587–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stawinski J, Wierzcho J, Garcia-Gonzalez MT (1990) The influence of calcium and sodium concentration on the microstructure of bentonite and kaolin. Clays Clay Miner 38(6):617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tarchitzky J, Rimon A, Kenig E, Dosoretz CG, Chen Y (2013) Biological and chemical fouling in drip irrigation systems utilizing treated wastewater. Irrig Sci 31(6):1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang J, Gong S, Xu D, Yu Y, Zhao Y (2013) Impact of drip and level basin irrigation on growth and yield of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Irrig Sci 31(5):1025–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei Z, Cao M, Tang Y, Lu B (2009) Two-phase flow analysis and experimental investigation of micro-PIV for emitter micro-channels. Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries. CSIRO, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu IP, Gitlin HM (1983) Drip irrigation application efficiency and schedules. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 26(1):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Zhao WH, Tang YP, Lu BH (2010) Anti-clogging performance evaluation and parameterized design of emitters with labyrinth channels. Comput Electron Agric 74:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou B, Li YK, Song P, Xu ZC, Bralts VF (2016) A kinetic model for biofilm growth inside non-PC emitters under reclaimed water drip irrigation. Agric Water Manage 168:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nassim Ait-Mouheb
    • 1
  • Juliette Schillings
    • 1
  • Jafar Al-Muhammad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ryad Bendoula
    • 1
  • Séverine Tomas
    • 1
  • Muriel Amielh
    • 2
  • Fabien Anselmet
    • 2
  1. 1.IRSTEA Montpellier, Université de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.CNRS-Aix Marseille Université-École Centrale Marseille, IRPHEMarseille Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations