Irrigation Science

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 33–43 | Cite as

Real-time prediction of soil infiltration characteristics for the management of furrow irrigation

Original Paper

Abstract

The spatial and temporal variations commonly found in the infiltration characteristic for surface-irrigated fields are a major physical constraint to achieve higher irrigation application efficiencies. Substantial work has been directed towards developing methods to estimate the infiltration characteristics of soil from irrigation advance data. However, none of the existing methods are entirely suitable for use in real-time control. The greatest limitation is that they are data intensive. A new method that uses a model infiltration curve (MIC) is proposed. In this method a scaling process is used to reduce the amount of data required to predict the infiltration characteristics for each furrow and each irrigation event for a whole field. Data from 44 furrow irrigation events from two different fields were used to evaluate the proposed method. Infiltration characteristics calculated using the proposed method were compared to values calculated from the full advance data using the INFILT computer model. The infiltration curves calculated by the proposed method were of similar shape to the INFILT curves and gave similar values for cumulative infiltration up to the irrigation advance time for each furrow. More importantly the statistical properties of the two sets of infiltration characteristics were similar. This suggests that they would return equivalent estimates of irrigation performance for the two fields and that the proposed method could be suitable for use in real-time control.

References

  1. Azevedo CAV, Merkley GP, Walker WR (1996) Surface irrigation real-time optimization model (SIRTOM). In: Proceedings of computers in agriculture conference, Cancun Mexico, 11–14 June 1996. ASAE, pp 872–884Google Scholar
  2. Camecho E, Lucena CP, Canas JR, Alcaide M (1997) Model for management and control of furrow irrigation in real-time. J Irrig Drain Eng 123(4):264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalton P, Raine SR, Broadfoot K (2001) Best management practices for maximising whole farm irrigation efficiency in the Australian cotton industry. Final report to the Cotton Research and Development Corporation, National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture Report 179707/2, USQ, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott RL, Walker WR (1982) Field evaluation of furrow infiltration and advance functions. Trans ASAE 25(2):396–400Google Scholar
  5. Gillies MH, Smith RJ (2005) Infiltration parameters from surface irrigation advance and runoff data. Irrig Sci 24(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khatri KL, Smith RJ (2005) Evaluation of methods for determining infiltration parameters from irrigation advance data. Irrig Drain 54:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1996) Infiltration parameters from optimization on furrow irrigation advance data. Irrig Sci 17(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nachabe MH (1996) Microscopic capillary length, sorptivity, and shape factor in modelling the infiltration rate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60(4):957–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oyonarte NA, Mateos L, Palomo MJ (2002) Infiltration variability in furrow irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Raine SR, Bakker DM (1996) Increased furrow irrigation efficiency through better design and management of cane fields. In: Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugercane Technologists, pp 119–124Google Scholar
  11. Raine SR, McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1997) The development of guidelines for surface irrigation in areas with variable infiltration. In: Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugercane Technologists, pp 293–301Google Scholar
  12. Sepaskhah AR, Afshar-Chamanabad H (2002) Determination of infiltration rate of every-other furrow irrigation. Biosyst Eng 82(4):479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shafique MS, Skogerboe GV (1983) Impact of seasonal infiltration function variation on furrow irrigation performance. In: Advances in infiltration, proceedings of national conference on advances in infiltration. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 292–301Google Scholar
  14. Smith RJ, Raine SR, Minkovich J (2005) Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton. Agric Water Manag 71(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Warrick AW, Hussein AA (1993) Scaling of Richards equation for infiltration and drainage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Warrick AW, Lomen DO, Yates SR (1985) A generalised solution to infiltration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wu L, Pan L (1997) A generalised solution to infiltration from single ring infiltrometers by scaling. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1318–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Youngs EG, Price RI (1981) Scaling of infiltration behaviour in dissimilar porous materials. Water Resour Res 17:1065–1070Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, and National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture, Faculty of Engineering and SurveyingUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations