CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 40–46 | Cite as

Early detection and treatment of hemodialysis access dysfunction

  • Juan José Gallego Beuter
  • Antonio Hernández Lezana
  • José Herrero Calvo
  • Rosa Moreno Carriies
Clinical Investigations


Purpose: To assess the usefulness of a program for the early detection of hemodialysis graft dysfunction and the impact on graft survival of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent implantation to correct venous stenosis.

Methods: A program for the early detection of hemodialysis access graft dysfunction was carried out in l 10 patients over a period of 80 months. Detection was based on physical examination, flow rate measurements, venous pressure, and analytical determinations performed at dialysis. The stenoses detected were treated by PTA or PTA plus stent deployment. Survival curves compared primary and assisted patency rates for the different graft types.

Results: The most important indicators of dysfunction were increased venous pressure and difficulty in cannulation of the graft. Significant stenoses were revealed by 227 (92.2%) of the 246 fistulography procedures performed. PTA results were satisfactory in 100% of the Thomas grafts. 74% of the Brescia-Cimino (BC) grafts, and 53% of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. Technical success rates for stent deployment were 92% for BC grafts and 100% for PTFE grafts, while functional success rates were 96% and 97%, respectively. The difference in the primary patency (PI) and assisted patency (CAP) values was statistically significant for all three graft types. There was no significant difference in the patency rates for grafts treated by PTA alone or by PTA and stent deployment.

Conclusion: A surveillance program helped prevent graft thrombosis, and intervention as required achieved excellent primary and assisted patency rates. Stent deployment salvaged a considerable number of accesses but did not significantly extend access survival time.

Key words

Hemodialysis access dysfunction Early detection Percutaneous treatment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Valderrabano F, Jones EHP, Mallick NP (1995) Report of management of renal failure in Europe XXIV. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10 [Suppl 5]:1–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ONT (1996) Memoria 1995. Rev Esp Transplantes 5:16–27Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray RJ (1997) Percutaneous intervention for permanent hemodialysis access: A review. J Vase Interv Radiol 8:313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beathard GA (1992) Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int 42:1390–1397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sullivan KL, Besarab A (1997) Hemodynamic screening and early percutaneous intervention reduce hemodialysis access thrombosis and increase graft longevity. J Vase Interv Radiol 8:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwab SJ, Raymond JR, Saeed M, Newman GE, Dennis PA, Bollinger RR (1989) Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis: Early detection of venous stenosis. Kidney Int 36:707–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beathard GA (1992) Physical examination of AV grafts, (abstract) Semin Dial 5:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sara AA, Valji K, Roberts C, Ziegler TW, Hye RJ, Oglevie SB (1996) Detection and treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis access grafts: Effect of a surveillance program on graft patency and the incidence of thrombosis. Radiology 199:653–657Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumpe DA (1998) Fibrinolysis and angioplasty in the treatment of failed dialysis access sites. J Vase Interv Radiol 9 [Suppl SCVIR-98]: 120–126Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vascular Access Working Group (1997) Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQl). Am J Kid Dis 30 (Suppl 2):S15-S64Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Windus DW, Audrain J, Vanderson R, Jendrisac M, Picus D, Delmez JA (1990) Optimization of high-efficiency hemodialysis by detection and correction of fistula dysfunction. Kidney Int 38:337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turmel-Rodrigues LA, Pengloan J, Blanchier D, Abaza M, Birmele B, Haillot O, Blanchard D (1993) Insufficient dialysis shunts: Improved long-term patency rates with closed hemodynamic monitoring, repeated balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. Radiology 187:273–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanterman RY, Vesely TM, Pilgram TK, Guy BW, Windus DW, Picus D (1995) Dialysis access grafts: Anatomic location of venous stenoses and results of angioplasty. Radiology 195:135–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saeed M, Newman GE, McCann RL, Sussman SK, Braun SD, Dunnick RR (1987) Stenoses in dialysis fistulas: Treatment with percutaneous angioplasty. Radiology 164:693–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KMH, Hoong J, Lipkowitz GS (1987) The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the management of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg 206:777–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rodriguez Perez JC, Maynar M, Ramos A, Plaza C, Vega N, Alamo R, Reyes R, Fernandez A, Palop L (1989) PTA as best treatment in stenoses of vascular access for hemodialysis. Nephron 51:192–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beathard GA (1993) Gianturco self-expanding stent in the treatment of stenoses in dialysis access grafts. Kidney Int 43:872–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinn SF, Schuman ES, Demlow TA, Standage BA, Ragsdale JW, Green GS, Shelcy RC (1995) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus endovascular stent placement in the treatment of venous stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: Intermediate results. J Vase Interv Radiol 6:851–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoffer EK, Shahnaz S, Herskowitz MM, Daniels ID, Sclalani SJA (1977) Prospective randomized trial of a metallic intravascular stent in hemodialysis graft maintenance. J Vase Interv Radiol 8:965–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vorwerk D, Guenther R, Mann H, Bohndorf K, Keulers P, Alzen G, Sohn M, Kistler D (1995) Venous stenoses and occlusion in hemodialysis shunts: Follow-up results. Radiology 195:140–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zollikofer CL, Antonnucci F, Stuckman G, Mattias P, Briihlmann WF, Salomonowitz EK (1992) Use of Wallstent in the venous system including hemodialysis related stenoses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 15:334–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turmel-Rodrigues LA, Blanchard D, Pengloan J, Sapoval M, Baudin S, Testou D, Mounton A, Abaza M (1997) Wallstents and Cragg stents in hemodialysis grafts fistulas: Results for selective indications. J Vase Interv Radiol 8:975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zijlstra JJ (1989) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in vascular access for hemodialysis: A manual for the radiologist. IGG Printing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 59–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan José Gallego Beuter
    • 1
  • Antonio Hernández Lezana
    • 1
  • José Herrero Calvo
    • 2
  • Rosa Moreno Carriies
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHospital Clinico San CarlosMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of NephrologyHospital Clinico San CarlosMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Vascular SurgeryHospital Clinico San CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations