Advertisement

Experimental TIPS with spiral Z-stents in swine with and without induced portal hypertension

  • Kimihiko Kichikawa
  • Richard R. Saxon
  • Kiyoshi Nishimine
  • Norifumi Nishida
  • Barry T. Uchida
Laboratory Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the suitability of spiral Z-stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and the influence of portal hypertension on shunt patency in young swine.

Methods

TIPS were established using spiral Z-stents in 14 domestic swine. In 7 animals, the portal venous pressure was normal; in the other 7, acute portal hypertension was induced by embolization of portal vein branches. Follow-up portal venography and histologic evaluations were done from 1 hr to 12 weeks after TIPS.

Results

Follow-up transhepatic portal venograms showed progressive narrowing of the shunt, most priminent in the midportion of the tract. Ingrowth of liver parenchyma between the stent wires found after 3 weeks led to progressive shunt narrowing and shunt occlusion by 12 weeks. A pseudointima grew rapidly inside the stent, peaked in thickness around 4 weeks, and decreased later. Acutely created portal hypertension rapidly returned to normal and there was no difference in TIPS patency between the two groups of animals.

Conclusion

Although the spiral Z-stent can be used as a device for creation of TIPS in patients with cirrhotic livers, it is associated with extensive liver ingrowth in swine that leads to rapid shunt occlusion. Portal hypertension was only transient in this model.

Key words

Shunts, portosystemic Stents and prostheses Portal hypertension 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maeda M, Timmermans HA, Uchida BT, Keller FS, Rösch J (1992) In vitro comparison of the spiral Z-stent and the Gianturco Z-stent. J Vasc Interv Radiol 3:565–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rösch J, Hanafee WN, Snow H (1969) Transjugular portovenography and radiologic portacaval shunt: An experimental study. Radiology 92:1112–1114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palmaz JC, Sibbitt RR, Reuter SR, Garcia F, Tio FO (1985) Expandable intrahepatic portacaval shunt stents: Early experience in the dog. AJR 145:821–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rösch J, Uchida BT, Putnam JS, Buschman RW, Law RD, Hershey AL (1987) Experimental intrahepatic portacaval anastomosis: Use of expandible Gianturco stents. Radiology 162:481–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palmaz JC, Garcia F, Sibbitt RR, Tio FO, Kopp DT, Schwesinger W, Lancaster JL, Chang P (1986) Expandable intrahepatic portacaval shunt stents in dogs with chronic portal hypertension. AJR 147:1251–1254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishimine K, Saxon RR, Kichikawa K, Mendel-Hartvig J, Timmermans HA, Shim HJ, Uchida BT, Barton RE, Keller FS, Rösch J (1995) Improved transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency with PTFE-covered stent-grafts: Experimental results in swine. Radiology 196:341–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rösch J, Uchida BT, Barton RE, Keller FS (1993) Coaxial catheter needle for transjugular portal vein entrance: Technical note. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:145–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    LaBerge JM, Ferrell LD, Ring EJ, Gordon RL, Lake JR, Roberts JP, Ascher NL (1991) Histopathological study of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2:549–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaBerge JM, Ferrell LD, Ring EJ, Gordon RL (1993) Histopathological study of stenotic and occluded transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:779–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haskal ZJ, Pentecost MJ, Soulen MC, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Baum RA, Cope C (1994) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stenosis and revision: Early and midterm results. AJR 163:439–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Criscuolo GR, Oldfield EH, Doppman JL (1989) Reversible acute and subacute myelopathy in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 70:354–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quisling RG, Mickle JP, Ballinger WB, Carver CC, Kaplan B (1984) Histopathologic analysis of intraarterial polyvinyl alcohol microemboli in rat cerebral cortex. AJNR 5:101–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rösch J, Uchida BT, Sewall GE, Peterson BD, Saxon RR, Barton RE, Keller FS (1996) TIPS with self-expandable Z-stents. In: Conn HO, Palmaz JC, Rösch J, Rossle M (eds) TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Igaku-Shoin Medical Pub Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krajina A, Hulek P, Elias P, Michl A, Niangova I, Volfova M, Vanasek T. (1995) Do spiral Z-stents in TIPS create additional problems? (abstract) Presented at the 9th European Congress of Radiology, March 5–10, 1995, Vienna, Austria. Eur Radiol 5 [suppl]:S219Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krajina A, Hulek P, Elias P, Michl A, Vanasek T, Niagnova I, Zizka J (1995) TIPS with spiral Z-stents: Mid-term results (abstract) Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18(1):S59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimihiko Kichikawa
    • 1
  • Richard R. Saxon
    • 1
  • Kiyoshi Nishimine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Norifumi Nishida
    • 1
    • 3
  • Barry T. Uchida
    • 1
  1. 1.Dotter Interventional InstituteOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and OncoradiologyNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyWakayama Medical CollegeWakayama CityJapan

Personalised recommendations