Reply to: Josef Tacke, et al. The Randomized Freeway Stent Study: Drug-Eluting Balloons Outperform Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Postdilatation of Nitinol Stents in the SFA and PI Segment
Compliance to Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study on which this letter refers to was approved by the local human research ethics committee, and all procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the abovementioned study.
Consent for Publication
Consent for Publication was obtained for every individual person's data included in the abovementioned study.
- 1.Tacke Josef, Müller-Hüisbeck Stephan, Schröder Henrik, Lammer Johannes, Schürmann Karl, Gross-Fengels Walter, Fischbach Roman, Textor Jochen, Boguth Lothar, Loewe Christian, Häuser Hannes, Gschwendtner Manfred, Tepe Gunnar, Pogge Rembert, von Strandmann Stefanie, Stahnke Johannes Dambach, Hausegger Klaus. The randomized freeway stent study: drug-eluting balloons outperform standard balloon angioplasty for postdilatation of nitinol stents in the SFA and PI segment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(11):1513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Shlofmita E, Kuku KO, Waksman R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2019;67(4):306–17.Google Scholar