Advertisement

Regarding “Long-Term Evaluation of Percutaneous Groin Access for EVAR”

  • Alan D. WhiteEmail author
  • Can Hazar
  • David Jarosz
  • Paul Walker
  • Costa Tingerides
Letter to the Editor
  • 37 Downloads

Dears Sirs

We read with great interest the article by Dwivedi et al [1]. The use of percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with high success rate and low incident of complications. The authors observed that accessed vessels do not show evidence of stenosis or thrombosis on routine follow-up CT scans performed at 30 days and annually thereafter.

However, the authors do not report vessel diameter on the preoperative imaging. The comparison is between postoperative scans. It could be argued that any change in diameter secondary to the use of a closure device is best assessed by comparing scans before and after the use of the device. Additional review of the pre-procedure CT to assess effect of the procedure on vessel diameter would be very informative.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Dwivedi K, Regi JM, Cleveland TJ, et al. Long-Term Evaluation of Percutaneous Groin Access for EVAR. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2019;42:28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2072-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyLeeds Teaching Hospital NHS TrustLeedsUK
  2. 2.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations