Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 101–109 | Cite as

Introducing the New 3.5/28 Microstent Retriever for Recanalization of Distal Cerebral Arteries in Acute Stroke: Preliminary Results

  • Monika Müller-EschnerEmail author
  • Se-Jong You
  • Kolja Jahnke
  • Sara Kammerer
  • Christian Foerch
  • Waltraud Pfeilschifter
  • Arne Lauer
  • Joachim Berkefeld
  • Marlies Wagner
Clinical Investigation Stroke/Neurointerventions
  • 150 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Stroke/Neurointerventions

Abstract

Background and Purpose

To describe our first experience using a small stent retriever specifically designed for thrombectomy in cerebral arteries with a small caliber (Acandis APERIO® 3.5/28) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Materials and Methods

All patients with an acute ischemic stroke, who underwent endovascular recanalization using the APERIO® thrombectomy device with a diameter of 3.5 mm, were identified in retrospect and included in the present analysis. Demographic and clinical data as well as data on the procedures performed were collected (patient sex, mean age, NIHSS, mRS, TICI score, and complications).

Results

Stent retriever-based thrombectomy with the Aperio® 3.5/28 alone (n = 10 vessels) or in combination with other devices (n = 13 vessels) was performed in 22 acute stroke patients with embolic occlusions of distal branches of the anterior and posterior circulations (median NIHSS = 8.5). For vessels treated with the Aperio® 3.5/28, we achieved a TICI 2b/3 reperfusion rate of 73.9%. One patient suffered a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombectomy; otherwise, no procedure-related complications were seen.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that mechanical thrombectomy of distal cerebral artery occlusions with the Aperio® 3.5/28 is feasible and in general safe, thus offering a promising option for endovascular stroke therapy. However, multicentric studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to evaluate the clinical benefit.

Keywords

Ischemic stroke Artery Endovascular procedures Thrombectomy Stent retriever 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Müller-Eschner has nothing to disclose. Dr. You has nothing to disclose. Dr. Jahnke has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kammerer has nothing to disclose. Dr. Foerch reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim (honorarium) and Prediction Bioscience (honorarium), outside the submitted work. Dr. Pfeilschifter reports grants and personal fees from Stryker Neurovascular, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr. Lauer has nothing to disclose. Dr. Berkefeld reports personal fees from Member of the scientific advisory board of Acandis, Pforzheim, Germany, other from Scientific cooperation with Siemens healthcare, Forchheim, Germany, outside the submitted work. Dr. Wagner reports personal fees from Acandis GmbH, during the conduct of the study.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This retrospective case series analysis was approved by the institutional review board.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 h after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coutinho JM, Liebeskind DS, Slater LA, Nogueira RG, Baxter BW, Levy EI, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for isolated M2 occlusions: a post hoc analysis of the STAR, SWIFT, and SWIFT PRIME studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(4):667–72.  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuhn AL, Wakhloo AK, Lozano JD, Massari F, De Macedo RK, Marosfoi MG, et al. Two-year single-center experience with the ‘Baby Trevo’ stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(6):541–6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurre W, Aguilar-Perez M, Martinez-Moreno R, Schmid E, Bazner H, Henkes H. Stent retriever thrombectomy of small caliber intracranial vessels using pREset LITE: safety and efficacy. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-016-0497-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorn F, Lockau H, Stetefeld H, Kabbasch C, Kraus B, Dohmen C, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy of M2-occlusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(7):1465–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.04.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Navia P, Larrea JA, Pardo E, Arce A, Martinez-Zabaleta M, Diez-Gonzalez N, et al. Initial experience using the 3MAX cerebral reperfusion catheter in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke of distal arteries. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(8):787–90.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011798.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Premat K, Bartolini B, Baronnet-Chauvet F, Shotar E, Degos V, Muresan P, et al. Single-center experience using the 3MAX reperfusion catheter for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with distal arterial occlusions. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0594-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wenger KJ, Berkefeld J, Wagner M. Flat panel detector computed tomography for the interaction between contrast-enhanced thrombi and stent retrievers in stroke therapy: a pilot study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2014;24(3):251–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-013-0246-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, Molina CA, Garami Z, Calleja S, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(3):948–54.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000257304.21967.ba.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wenger K, Nagl F, Wagner M, Berkefeld J. Improvement of stent retriever design and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in a flow model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(1):192–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0420-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rai AT, Hogg JP, Cline B, Hobbs G. Cerebrovascular geometry in the anterior circulation: an analysis of diameter, length and the vessel taper. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(4):371–5.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rai AT, Rodgers D, Williams EA, Hogg JP. Dimensions of the posterior cerebral circulation: an analysis based on advanced non-invasive imaging. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(6):597–600.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ring BA, Waddington MM. Intraluminal diameters of the intracranial arteries. Vasc Surg. 1967;1(3):137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital FrankfurtGoethe-UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Neurology, University Hospital FrankfurtGoethe-UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations