Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma in Children and Adults: A Comparative Analysis in 92 Patients

  • Anthony N. Hage
  • Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
  • Joseph J. Gemmete
  • Jason J. Grove
  • Ravi N. Srinivasa
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To compare technical success, complications, and long-term clinical success following radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas in pediatric and adult patients.

Materials and Methods

Ninety-two patients underwent percutaneous computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteomas including 54 pediatric (mean age 12.9 years) and 38 adult (mean age 24.1 years) patients. Presenting indication, osteoma location, ablation method, technical success, complications, visual analog score, radiographic follow-up, clinical success, reintervention rate, and total follow-up were reported. Technical success was defined as placement of the probe in the radiolucent nidus with ablation. Clinical success was defined as resolution of symptoms.

Results

Ablation indications included: pain localized to the lesion, night pain, and an osteoma on imaging in all patients. Majority of osteoid osteomas were localized to the femur (pediatric [n = 22, 40.7%]; adult [n = 12, 34.2%]) and tibia (pediatric [n = 21, 38.9%]; adult [n = 10, 26.3%]). Mean lesion size was 9.6 mm in pediatric patients and 9.0 mm in adults. Technical success was achieved in all pediatric patients (100%) and 97.4% of adults. Two complications occurred. Primary clinical success was achieved in 49 (90.7%) pediatric and 35 (92.1%) adult patients. Five (9.3%) pediatric and 3 (7.9%) adult patients sought reintervention for residual symptoms, and all had secondary clinical success. Mean total follow-up was 95.2 ± 58.7 months in pediatric and 90.0 ± 61.6 months in adult patients. No differences in outcomes were identified between pediatric and adult patients.

Conclusion

Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas is safe with excellent technical and clinical success rates in pediatric and adult patients.

Keywords

Osteoid osteoma Radiofrequency Ablation 

Notes

Authors’ contribution

All authors have read and contributed to this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Hakim DN, Pelly T, Kulendran M, Caris JA. Benign tumours of the bone: a review. J Bone Oncol. 2015;4:37–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebauer B, Collettini F, Bruger C, Schaser K-D, Melcher I, Tunn P-U, Streitparth F. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas: analgesia and patient satisfaction in long-term follow-up. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der Bildgeb Verfahren. 2013;184:959–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chai JW, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Koh YH, Lee JW, Choi J-A, Kang HS. Radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma: from simple to challenging findings. RadioGraphics. 2010;30:737–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Wolfe MW, Jennings LC, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:815–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Torriani M, Rosenthal DI. Percutaneous radiofrequency treatment of osteoid osteoma. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:615–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyazaki M, Arai Y, Myoui A, Gobara H, Sone M, Rosenthal DI, Tsushima Y, Kanazawa S, Ehara S, Endo K. Phase I/II multi-institutional study of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for painful osteoid osteoma (JIVROSG-0704). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39:1464–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papathanassiou ZG, Petsas T, Papachristou D, Megas P. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas: five years experience. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:827–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lanza E, Thouvenin Y, Viala P, Sconfienza LM, Poretti D, Cornalba G, Sardanelli F, Cyteval C. Osteoid osteoma treated by percutaneous thermal ablation: when do we fail? A systematic review and guidelines for future reporting. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1530–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knudsen M, Riishede A, Lücke A, Gelineck J, Keller J, Baad-Hansen T. Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective treatment of osteoid osteoma located outside the spine. Dan Med J. 2015;62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rehnitz C, Sprengel SD, Lehner B, Ludwig K, Omlor G, Merle C, Kauczor H-U, Ewerbeck V, Weber M-A. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: clinical success and long-term follow up in 77 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3426–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rimondi E, Mavrogenis AF, Rossi G, Ciminari R, Malaguti C, Tranfaglia C, Vanel D, Ruggieri P. Radiofrequency ablation for non-spinal osteoid osteomas in 557 patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:181–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chahal A, Rajalakshmi P, Khan S, Rastogi S, Srivastava D, Gamanagatti S. CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: our experience in 87 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017;27:207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Earhart J, Wellman D, Donaldson J, Chesterton J, King E, Janicki JA. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma: results and complications. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43:814–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donkol RH, Al-Nammi A, Moghazi K, Albisinni U, Chiatante M, Rinaldi R. Efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:180–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nijland H, Gerbers JG, Bulstra SK, Overbosch J, Stevens M, Jutte PC. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crane E, Ritchie D, Jane M, Mahendra A. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: outcomes from the West of Scotland. Scott Med J. 2013;58:83–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abboud S, Kosmas C, Novak R, Robbin M. Long-term clinical outcomes of dual-cycle radiofrequency ablation technique for treatment of osteoid osteoma. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albisinni U, Facchini G, Spinnato P, Gasbarrini A, Bazzocchi A. Spinal osteoid osteoma: efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46:1087–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lassalle L, Campagna R, Corcos G, Babinet A, Larousserie F, Stephanazzi J, Feydy A. Therapeutic outcome of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with osteoid osteoma. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46:949–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber M-A, Sprengel SD, Omlor GW, Lehner B, Wiedenhöfer B, Kauczor H-U, Rehnitz C. Clinical long-term outcome, technical success, and cost analysis of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of osteoblastomas and spinal osteoid osteomas in comparison to open surgical resection. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44:981–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindner NJ, Ozaki T, Roedl R, Gosheger G, Winkelmann W, Wörtler K. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:391–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chick JFB, Srinivasa RN, Johnson E, Osher ML, Hage A, Gemmete JJ. Epidural balloon placement for protection of the spinal canal during cryoablation of paraspinal lesions. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1815-x.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sacks D, Mcclenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000094584.83406.3e.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rehnitz C, Sprengel SD, Lehner B, Ludwig K, Omlor G, Merle C, Kauczor H-U, Ewerbeck V, Weber M-A. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: correlation of clinical outcome and imaging features. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:330–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony N. Hage
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
    • 1
  • Joseph J. Gemmete
    • 1
  • Jason J. Grove
    • 1
  • Ravi N. Srinivasa
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of RadiologyUniversity of Michigan Health Systems, Michigan MedicineAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations