Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 873–883 | Cite as

Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Juil Park
  • Jeong Min LeeEmail author
  • Dong Ho Lee
  • Ijin Joo
  • Jeong Hee Yoon
  • Jin Young Park
  • Ernst Klotz
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the value of pre-radiofrequency ablation (RFA) MR and post-RFA CT registration for the assessment of the therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 178 patients with single HCC who received RFA as an initial treatment and had available pre-RFA MR and post-RFA CT images were included in this retrospective study. Two independent readers (one experienced radiologist, one inexperienced radiologist) scored the ablative margin (AM) of treated tumors on a four-point scale (1, residual tumor; 2, incomplete AM; 3, borderline AM; 4, sufficient AM), in two separate sessions: (1) visual comparison between pre-and post-RFA images; (2) with addition of nonrigid registration for pre- and post-RFA images. Local tumor progression (LTP) rates between low-risk (response score, 3–4) and high-risk groups (1–2) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method at each interpretation session.

Results

The patients’ reassignments after using the registered images were statistically significant for inexperienced reader (p < 0.001). In the inexperienced reader, LTP rates of low- and high-risk groups were significantly different with addition of registered images (session 2) (p < 0.001), but not significantly different in session 1 (p = 0.101). However, in the experienced reader, LTP rates of low- and high-risk groups were significantly different in both interpretation sessions (p < 0.001). Using the registered images, the cumulative incidence of LTP at 2 years was 3.0–6.6%, for the low-risk group, and 18.6–27.8% for the high-risk group.

Conclusion

Registration between pre-RFA MR and post-RFA CT images may allow better assessment of the therapeutic response of HCC after RFA, especially for inexperienced radiologists, helping in the risk stratification for LTP.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma Radiofrequency ablation Ablative margin Nonrigid registration Local tumor progression 

Notes

Funding

This study was not funded by any grant.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Author 1 is an employee of Siemens Healthcare. The prototype software (HepaCare version 3.0) utilized in this study was provided by Siemens Healthcare. However, control of all data and information submitted for publication was given to the authors who were not affiliated with Siemens Healthcare. For the remaining authors, they have nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study before performing radiofrequency ablation. Since the subsequent follow-up liver MR or CT images were obtained during routine clinical practice, the requirement for written informed consent was waived. This retrospective, single-center study was approved by our institutional review board.

Supplementary material

270_2017_1571_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(Suppl):S2–6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruix J, Sherman M. American Association for the Study of Liver D. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):1020–2. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen X, Chen Y, Li Q, Ma D, Shen B, Peng C. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2015;195(1):166–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2011;98(9):1210–24. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH, Yu SJ, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, et al. Small single-nodule hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic resection by using inverse probability weighting. Radiology. 2014;271(3):909–18. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131760.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M, Colecchia A, Ercolani G, Bolondi L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2013;59(2):300–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pompili M, Saviano A, de Matthaeis N, Cucchetti A, Ardito F, Federico B, et al. Long-term effectiveness of resection and radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm. Results of a multicenter Italian survey. J Hepatol. 2013;59(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee MW, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors. J Hepatol. 2013;58(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiina S, Tateishi R, Arano T, Uchino K, Enooku K, Nakagawa H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year outcome and prognostic factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(4):569–77. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.425 quiz 78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Xu D, Yin Z, Xie F, et al. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee DH, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as first-line treatment: long-term results and prognostic factors in 162 patients with cirrhosis. Radiology. 2014;270(3):900–9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130940.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho YK, Rhim H, Noh S. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection as primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(9):1354–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06812.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria–a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(11):1691–1705 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin S, Lee JM, Kim KW, Joo I, Han JK, Choi BI, et al. Postablation assessment using follow-up registration of CT images before and after radiofrequency ablation (RFA): prospective evaluation of midterm therapeutic results of RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(1):70–7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schraml C, Clasen S, Schwenzer NF, Koenigsrainer I, Herberts T, Claussen CD, et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the immediate assessment of radiofrequency ablation success in colorectal liver metastases. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(6):643–51. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9351-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fujioka C, Horiguchi J, Ishifuro M, Kakizawa H, Kiguchi M, Matsuura N, et al. A feasibility study: evaluation of radiofrequency ablation therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma using image registration of preoperative and postoperative CT. Acad Radiol. 2006;13(8):986–94. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.05.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niculescu G, Foran DJ, Nosher J. Non-rigid registration of the liver in consecutive CT studies for assessment of tumor response to radiofrequency ablation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:856–9. doi: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4352425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giesel FL, Mehndiratta A, Locklin J, McAuliffe MJ, White S, Choyke PL, et al. Image fusion using CT, MRI and PET for treatment planning, navigation and follow up in percutaneous RFA. Exp Oncol. 2009;31(2):106–14.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brock KK, Dawson LA, Sharpe MB, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA. Feasibility of a novel deformable image registration technique to facilitate classification, targeting, and monitoring of tumor and normal tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(4):1245–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim KW, Lee JM, Klotz E, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Kim JY, et al. Safety margin assessment after radiofrequency ablation of the liver using registration of preprocedure and postprocedure CT images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):W565–72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee JM, Park JW. Choi BI 2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: HCC diagnostic algorithm. Dig Dis (Basel, Switzerland). 2014;32(6):764–77. doi: 10.1159/000368020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015;61(3):1056–65. doi: 10.1002/hep.27304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murray KF, Carithers RL Jr. AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1407–32. doi: 10.1002/hep.20704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S, Sato S, Tateishi R, Fujishima T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):122–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    N’Kontchou G, Mahamoudi A, Aout M, Ganne-Carrie N, Grando V, Coderc E, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors in 235 Western patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009;50(5):1475–83. doi: 10.1002/hep.23181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim YS, Lee WJ, Rhim H, Lim HK, Choi D, Lee JY. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (>2 and <5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):758–65. doi: 10.2214/ajr.09.2954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim YS, Rhim H, Cho OK, Koh BH, Kim Y. Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59(3):432–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.03.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu CH, Arellano RS, Uppot RN, Samir AE, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumours: effect of post-ablation margin on local tumour progression. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(4):877–85. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1610-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Makino Y, Imai Y, Igura T, Hori M, Fukuda K, Sawai Y, et al. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(1):102–11. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0201-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juil Park
    • 1
  • Jeong Min Lee
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dong Ho Lee
    • 1
  • Ijin Joo
    • 1
  • Jeong Hee Yoon
    • 1
  • Jin Young Park
    • 3
  • Ernst Klotz
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologySeoul National University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Institute of Radiation MedicineSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyDongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical SciencesBusanSouth Korea
  4. 4.Siemens Healthineers, Computed TomographyForchheimGermany

Personalised recommendations