CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 988–993 | Cite as

Stent Retriever Thrombectomy in Different Thrombus Locations of Anterior Cerebral Circulation

  • Sara Protto
  • Niko Sillanpää
  • Juha-Pekka Pienimäki
  • Ira Matkaselkä
  • Janne Seppänen
  • Heikki Numminen
Clinical Investigation



Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a safe and efficient treatment for acute ischemic stroke in patients with proximal anterior occlusion and large penumbra. We evaluated the technical and clinical success of MT in relation to the location of the occlusion (internal carotid artery, M1 and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery).


We prospectively reviewed 130 patients of whom 105 met the inclusion criteria. Baseline clinical, procedural and imaging variables, technical outcome (TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction), 24 h imaging outcome and three-month clinical outcome (mRS, modified Rankin Scale) were recorded. Differences between the groups were studied with statistical tests according to the type of the variable.


There were 37, 46 and 22 patients in the internal carotid artery (ICA), M1 and M2 groups, respectively. TICI 2b or 3 was achieved in 92 cases (88 %) with a non-significant trend towards a better recanalization outcome in the ICA and M1 groups. Overall, 57 of the 105 patients (55 %) experienced favorable clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) with no significant differences between the groups. Excellent outcome (mRS ≤ 1) was seen in 40 patients (39 %) and there proportionally more patients with excellent outcome in the ICA and M1 groups (ICA: 44 %, M1: 41 %, M2: 23 % of patients, p = 0.22).


There were no statistically significant differences in the technical or clinical outcomes between the different sites of occlusion (ICA, M1 or M2). There was a non-significant trend towards achieving excellent clinical outcome (3-month mRS ≤ 1) more often and better recanalization results in the two more proximal locations.


Interventional radiology Ischemic stroke Mechanical thrombectomy Stent retriever 



Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score


Cerebral blood volume


Cerebral oedema


Internal carotid artery




Middle cerebral artery


Mechanical thrombectomy


Mean transit time


National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale


Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction



The authors would like to thank Jyrki Ollikainen, MD, for clinical insights in preparing the manuscript. This study was financially supported by the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital (Grant 9S061).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding D. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a new standard of care. J Stroke. 2015;17:123–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1231–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Gupta R, et al. North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke Registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:584–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:948–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zangerle A, Kiechl S, Spiegel M, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: predictors and prognostic implications. Neurology. 2007;68:39–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    del Zoppo GJ, Poeck K, Pessin MS, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol. 1992;32:78–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Zimmer C, et al. The Curved MCA: influence of vessel anatomy on recanalization results of mechanical thrombectomy after acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:971–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deshaies EM, Singla A, Villwock MR, et al. Early experience with stent retrievers and comparison with previous-generation mechanical thrombectomy devices for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:12–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1241–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broussalis E, Trinka E, Hitzl W, et al. Comparison of stent-retriever devices versus the Merci retriever for endovascular treatment of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:366–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toni D, Lorenzano S, Puca E, et al. The SITS-MOST registry. Neurol Sci. 2006;27(Suppl 3):S260–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sillanpaa N, Saarinen JT, Rusanen H, et al. CT perfusion ASPECTS in the evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: thrombolytic therapy perspective. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011;1:6–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saarinen JT, Rusanen H, Sillanpaa N. Collateral score complements clot location in predicting the outcome of intravenous thrombolysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1892–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saarinen JT, Sillanpaa N, Rusanen H, et al. The mid-M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery is a cutoff clot location for good outcome in intravenous thrombolysis. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:1121–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Protto
    • 2
  • Niko Sillanpää
    • 2
  • Juha-Pekka Pienimäki
    • 2
  • Ira Matkaselkä
    • 2
  • Janne Seppänen
    • 2
  • Heikki Numminen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  2. 2.Medical Imaging CenterTampere University HospitalTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations