Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1502–1507 | Cite as

The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: Retrieval Success Rates in Practice

  • M. J. Lee
  • D. Valenti
  • M. A. de Gregorio
  • J. Minocha
  • U. Rimon
  • O. Pellerin
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

CIRSE established a registry of retrievable filter use with the primary aim of determining the success of IVC Filter retrieval and associated complications. Secondary endpoints included filter indications, imaging strategies before retrieval, filter dwell times, and anticoagulation status. A web-based electronic registry was hosted between 01/12/2010 and 30/06/2012. Data entry occurred at the date of IVC filter retrieval and included items such as filter type, indication for filter insertion, access route, dwell time, retrieval success, complications, reasons for failed retrieval, and anticoagulation status. 671 filter retrievals were entered (male:female 333:295, mean age 55, median 57). Retrieval data were not entered in 43/671 leaving 628 patients for analysis. The 4 commonest retrievable filters used were the Celect in 182 patients, the OPTEASE in 161, ALN in 120, and Gunther Tulip in 98. Filters were inserted for absolute indications 40 %, relative indications in 31 %, and prophylactic in 24 %, with 5 % missing. Mean filter dwell time was 90 days. Filters were successfully retrieved in 576/628 patients (92 %). The mean dwell time for successful retrievals was 85 days versus 145 days for unsuccessful retrievals (p = 0.001). Major complications occurred in 2 patients (0.03 %). In summary, the CIRSE retrievable filter registry demonstrates a retrieval rate of 92 % across a range of filter types, with a low major complication rate, reflecting current practice. There is an increase in trend of retrievable filter use for relative and prophylactic indications.

Keywords

Venous intervention Inferior vena cava filter (IVC) placement Vena cava Pulmonary embolism (PE) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dendrite clinical systems (London, UK) for database support. CIRSE research and analytics dept for statistical support.

Conflict of interest

Lee MJ, Valenti D, de Gregorio, Minocha J, Rimon U, and Pellerin O all declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Keeling AN, Kinney TB, Lee MJ. Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now? Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1556–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P, Laporte S, Faivre R, Charbonnier B, Barral FG, Huet Y, Simonneau G, For The PREPIC Study Group. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:409–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005;19(112):416–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pellerin O, Barral F, Sanchez O, Midulla M, Meyer G, Mismetti P, Sapoval M. Optional vena cava filter placement and 3 months retrievability: results of the PREPIC 2 randomized multicenter trial. JVIR. 2014;25(3):S84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. US Food and Drug Administration (2010) Medical devices. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm221676.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2013.
  6. 6.
    Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC, et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J Trauma. 2007;62(1):17–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oh JC, Trerotola SO, Dagli M, Shlanky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Itkin M, et al. Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with computed tomography findings indicating tenting or penetration of the inferior vena cava wall. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:70–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marquess JS, Burke CT, Beecham AH, Dixon RG, Stavas JM, Sag AA, et al. Factors associated with failed retrieval of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1321–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smouse HB, Rosenthal D, Thuong VH, Knox MF, Dixon RG, Voorhees WD III, et al. Long-term retrieval success rate profile for the Gunther Tulip vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:871–7 quiz 878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicholson W, Nicholson WJ, Tolerico P, Taylor B, Solomon S, Schryer T, et al. Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1827–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tam MD, Spain J, Lieber M, Sands MJ, Wang W. Fracture and distant migration of the Bard recovery filter: a retrospective review of 363 implantations for potentially life-threatening complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:199–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sano M, Unno N, Yamamoto N, Tanaka H, Konno H. Frequent fracture of TrapEase inferior vena cava filters: long-term follow-up assessment. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:189–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S, Bhanu SB, Avrin DE, Gordon RL, et al. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Gunther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:299–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arbi M, Willatt JM, Sheilds JJ, Cho KJ, Cwikiel WB. Retrievability of optional inferior vena cava filters with caudal migration and caval penetration: report of three cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:923–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ford ME, Lippert JA, McGraw JK. Symptomatic filter penetration presenting as pancreatitis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:574–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    LaBelle S. Markets for clot management devices. Toronto, Canada: ©Milllennium Research Group, A decision Resources Group Company; 2011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Union: European Commission; 2010. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-27072010-AP/EN/3-27072010-AP-EN.PDF Accessed 4 Nov 2012.
  18. 18.
    Census Data: US Census Bureau (2011). http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/. Accessed 31 Oct 2012.
  19. 19.
    Hameed F, Chan A, Gleierszewski K, Heilala S, Huynh N, Thevaratnam T.: European Markets for clot management devices. Toronto: ©2011 Milllennium Research Group, A decision Resources Group Company; 2011. 2012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hameed F. European Markets for Peripheral Vascular Devices 2011. Toronto, Canada: ©2010 Milllennium Research Group, A decision Resources Group Company; 2010.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Helt JA, Cohen AT, Anderson FA Jr. (2005) on behalf of the VTE Impact Assessment Group. Estimated annual number of incident and recurrent, non-fatal and fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the US. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts;106(11): Abstract 910.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98:756–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarostek S, Crowther M, Sloan JM. Indications, complications and management of inferior vena cava filters. The experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center. JAMA. 2013;173(7):513–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guyatt GH, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuunemann HJ. American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and prevention of Thrombosis panel: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence based practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):7S–47S.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lyon SM, Riojas GE, Uberoi R, et al. Short-and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry. JVIR. 2009;20(11):1441–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rimon U, Bensaid P, Golan G, et al. Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability. CVIR. 2009;34(3):532–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pellerin O, Barral FG, Lions C, Novelli L, Beregi JP, Sapoval M. Early and late retrieval of the ALN removable vena cava filter: results from a multicenter study. CVIR. 2008;31(5):889–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uberoi R, Ross Tapping C, Chalmers N, Allgar V. British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) inferior vena cava(IVC) filter registry. CVIR. 2013;36(6):1548–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rubenstein L, Ak Chun, Chew M, Binkert CA. Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:1315–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Aladdin M, Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF. Difficult retrieval of a recovery IVC filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:645–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stavropoulos SW, Solomon JA, Trerotola SO. Wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filters: imaging features and technique for removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:379–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burke CT, Dixon RG, Stavas JM. Use of rigid bronchoscopic forceps in the difficult retrieval of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Inter Radiol. 2007;18:1319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Lee
    • 1
  • D. Valenti
    • 2
  • M. A. de Gregorio
    • 3
  • J. Minocha
    • 4
  • U. Rimon
    • 5
  • O. Pellerin
    • 6
  1. 1.The Department of Academic RadiologyBeaumont HospitalDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of Interventional RadiologyUniversity of ZaragozaSaragossaSpain
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences SystemChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Diagnostic RadiologySheba Medical CenterTelhasomerIsrael
  6. 6.Department of Interventional RadiologyUniversité Paris 5 René Descartes, Hopital Européen Georges, PompidouParisFrance

Personalised recommendations