CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 523–535 | Cite as

Impact of 3D Rotational Angiography on Liver Embolization Procedures: Review of Technique and Applications

  • Pierleone LucatelliEmail author
  • Mario Corona
  • Renato Argirò
  • Michele Anzidei
  • Giulio Vallati
  • Fabrizio Fanelli
  • Mario Bezzi
  • Carlo Catalano


In the last years, the interest into interventional applications of C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) progressively raised, widening its clinical application from the original field of interventional neuroradiology to the field of peripheral procedures. Liver embolization procedures, due to their complexity and potential treatment-related life-threatening complications, represent one of the main clinical applications of this novel angiographic technique. CBCT has been demonstrated to render procedures safer and technically easier, and to predict outcome as well as to avoid major complications in different treatment scenarios (trans-arterial embolization, trans-arterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiation therapy, percutaneous portal vein embolization). This review summarizes all technical, dosimetric and procedural aspects of CBCT techniques, underlying all its potential clinical advantages in the field of liver embolization procedures. Moreover, the paper provides all the instructions to obtain the best diagnostic performance out of this novel angiographic technique.


Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Interventional oncology Embolization/embolisation/embolotherapy Radioembolization/radioembolisation Transarterial chemoembolization/embolisation (TACE) Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 


Conflict of interest

For all authors, there is no potential conflict of interest that could be perceived to bias our work.

Informed Consent

Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.


  1. 1.
    Basile A, Carrafiello G, Ierardi AM et al (2012) Quality-improvement guidelines for hepatic transarterial chemoembolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35(4):765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giammarile F, Bodei L, Chiesa C et al (2011) EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(7):1393–1406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Del Prete M, Fiore F, Modica R et al (2014) Hepatic arterial embolization in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 33:43CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Violari EG, Brody LA, Covey AM et al (2014) Successful control of liver metastases from pancreatic solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) using hepatic arterial embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0894-1
  5. 5.
    Cao G, Zhu X, Li J et al (2014) A comparative study between embosphere((R)) and conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of unresectable liver metastasis from GIST. Chin J Cancer Res 26(1):124–131PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molla N, AlMenieir N, Simoneau E et al (2014) The role of interventional radiology in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Oncol 21(3):e480–e492CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahnken AH, Spreafico C, Maleux G et al (2013) Standards of practice in transarterial radioembolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 36(3):613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talenfeld AD, Sista AK, Madoff DC (2014) Transarterial therapies for primary liver tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 23(2):323–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M (2002) Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 23(7):1199–1205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Missler U, Hundt C, Wiesmann M et al (2000) Three-dimensional reconstructed rotational digital subtraction angiography in planning treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol 10(4):564–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Song JK, Niimi Y, Brisman JL et al (2004) Simultaneous bilateral internal carotid artery 3D rotational angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 25(10):1787–1789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R et al (2005) Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 236(1):204–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katoh M, Opitz A, Minko P et al (2011) 2D rotational angiography for fast and standardized evaluation of peripheral and visceral artery stenoses. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(3):474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biasi L, Ali T, Hinchliffe R et al (2009) Intraoperative DynaCT detection and immediate correction of a type Ia endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(3):535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, Glaiberman C et al (2009) Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: applications in the interventional suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(7 Suppl.):S523–S537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N et al (2007) Usefulness of cone-beam volume CT with flat panel detectors in conjunction with catheter angiography for transcatheter arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(12):1508–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loffroy R, Favelier S, Cherblanc V et al (2013) C-arm dual-phase cone-beam CT: a revolutionary real-time imaging modality to assess drug-eluting beads TACE success in liver cancer patients. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3(4):196–199PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Hashimoto M et al (2013) Identification of small hepatocellular carcinoma and tumor-feeding branches with cone-beam CT guidance technology during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(4):501–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loffroy R, Lin M, Yenokyan G et al (2013) Intraprocedural C-arm dual-phase cone-beam CT: can it be used to predict short-term response to TACE with drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? Radiology 266(2):636–648CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang ZJ, Wang MQ, Duan F et al (2013) Clinical application of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with synchronous C-arm cone-beam CT guided radiofrequency ablation in treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(3):1649–1654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N et al (2014) C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med (Torino) 119(7):521–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD (2008) C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(6):814–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paul J, Jacobi V, Farhang M et al (2013) Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol 23(6):1582–1593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kothary N, Abdelmaksoud MH, Tognolini A et al (2011) Imaging guidance with C-arm CT: prospective evaluation of its impact on patient radiation exposure during transhepatic arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22(11):1535–1543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kobeiter H, Xu S et al (2013) Image fusion during vascular and nonvascular image-guided procedures. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):168–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kruecker J, Kadoury S et al (2012) Multimodality image fusion-guided procedures: technique, accuracy, and applications. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35(5):986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tacher V, Lin M, Bhagat N et al (2013) Dual-phase cone-beam computed tomography to see, reach, and treat hepatocellular carcinoma during drug-eluting beads transarterial chemo-embolization. J Vis Exp 82:50795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng AL, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y et al (2014) Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel. Liv Int 34(2):174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sahara S, Kawai N, Sato M et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with multiple anti-cancer drugs (epirubicin, cisplatin, mitomycin c, 5-fluorouracil) compared with TACE with epirubicin for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35(6):1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Di Martino M, De Filippis G, De Santis A et al (2013) Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prospective comparison of US, CT and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 23(4):887–896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Di Martino M, Di Miscio R, De Filippis G et al (2013) Detection of small (≤2 cm) HCC in cirrhotic patients: added value of diffusion MR-imaging. Abdom Imaging 38(6):1254–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Matoba M, Tonami H, Kuginuki M et al (2003) Comparison of high-resolution contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy. Clin Radiol 58(6):463–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen GW, Song B, Li ZL et al (2013) Ectopic blood supply of hepatocellular carcinoma as depicted by angiography with computed tomography: associations with morphological features and therapeutic history. PLoS One 8(8):e71942CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Okuda M et al (2009) Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography during ultraselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinomas that cannot be demonstrated on angiography. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(2):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Hashimoto N et al (2012) Survival after C-arm CT-assisted chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 81(12):3985–3992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cosimelli M, Mancini R, Carpanese L et al (2012) Integration of radioembolisation into multimodal treatment of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer. Exp Opin Ther Targets 16(Suppl 2):S11–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ahmadzadehfar H, Habibi E, Ezziddin S et al (2014) Survival after 131I-labeled lipiodol therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. A single-center study based on a long-term follow-up. Nukl Nucl Med 53(2):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bult W, Vente MA, Zonnenberg BA et al (2009) Microsphere radioembolization of liver malignancies: current developments. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53(3):325–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smits ML, Nijsen JF, van den Bosch MA et al (2010) Holmium-166 radioembolization for the treatment of patients with liver metastases: design of the phase I HEPAR trial. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:70CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Louie JD, Kothary N, Kuo WT et al (2009) Incorporating cone-beam CT into the treatment planning for yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(5):606–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Denys A, Bize P, Demartines N et al (2010) Quality improvement for portal vein embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33(3):452–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kapoor BS, Esparaz A, Levitin A et al (2013) Nonvascular and portal vein applications of cone-beam computed tomography: current status. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):150–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierleone Lucatelli
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mario Corona
    • 1
  • Renato Argirò
    • 1
  • Michele Anzidei
    • 1
  • Giulio Vallati
    • 2
  • Fabrizio Fanelli
    • 1
  • Mario Bezzi
    • 1
  • Carlo Catalano
    • 1
  1. 1.Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological SciencesSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Angiography and Interventional RadiologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori, Regina ElenaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations