CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1139–1143 | Cite as

Difficult OptEase Filter Retrievals After Prolonged Indwelling Times

  • Thuong G. Van Ha
  • Lisa Kang
  • Jonathan Lorenz
  • Steven Zangan
  • Rakesh Navuluri
  • Christopher Straus
  • Brian Funaki
Technical Note



The OptEase vena cave filter (Cordis, Piscataway, NJ) is commercially available as a retrievable or permanent filter with short recommended indwelling time, presumably due to extensive contact of the filter side struts with the inferior vena cava wall and subsequent neointimal hyperplasia leading to incorporation. Our purpose was to evaluate OptEase filter retrievals with a long indwelling time period that required unconventional retrieval techniques.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent OptEase filter retrieval with long undwelling times requiring additional maneuvers for retrieval. Techniques used included rigid endobronchial forceps dissection and wire-through-loop snare. Each patient underwent postretrieval venogram to evaluate for possible complications. In addition, patients had clinical follow-up 2 weeks after the retrieval procedure.


There were three patients (2 women, 1 man; average age 64 years) who underwent OptEase filter retrieval. The mean indwelling time was 6.4 months. The indwelling filters were successfully retrieved. There were no complications. Postprocedural follow-up showed no clinical pathology.


Unconventional techniques aided in the retrieval of OptEase filters with long indwelling times.


Venous intervention Inferior vena cava filter (IVC) placement Vena cava Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) 


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. 1.
    Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spencer FA, Bates SM, Goldberg RJ et al (2010) A population-based study of inferior vena cava filters in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 170:1456–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ (2008) Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edn). Chest 133:454S–545SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al (2006) Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:449–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piano G, Ketteler E, Prachand V et al (2007) Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patients. J Vasc Surg 45:784–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Ha TG, Chien AS, Funaki BS et al (2008) Use of retrievable compared to permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single-institution experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Girard P, Stern JB, Parent F (2002) Medical literature and vena cava filters: so far so weak. Chest 122:963–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angel LF, Tapson V, Galgon RE, Restrepo MI, Kaufman J (2011) Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1522–1530 e3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smouse HB, Rosenthal D, Van Ha T et al (2009) Long term retrieval success rate profile for the Gunther Tulip vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:871–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lyon SM, Riojas GE, Uberoi R et al (2009) Short and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1441–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashley DW, Mix JW, Christie B et al (2005) Removal of OptEase retrievable vena cava filter is not feasible after extended time periods because of filter protrusion through the vena cava. J Trauma 59:847–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rimon U, Bensaid P, Golan G et al (2011) OptEase vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34:532–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reekers JA, Hoogeveen YL, Wijnands M, Bosma G, Mulder R, Oliva VL (2004) Evaluation of the retrievability of the OptEase IVC filter in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giesbusch PP, Benenati JF, Pena CS et al (2012) Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: factors that affect retrieval success. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stavropoulos SW, Dixon RG, Burke CT et al (2008) Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1297–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo WT, Cupp JS, Louie JD et al (2012) Complex retrieval of embedded IVC filters: alternative techniques and histologic tissue analysis. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:588–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Ha TG, Vinokur O, Lorenz J et al (2009) Techniques used for difficult retrievals of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 32 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thuong G. Van Ha
    • 1
  • Lisa Kang
    • 1
  • Jonathan Lorenz
    • 1
  • Steven Zangan
    • 1
  • Rakesh Navuluri
    • 1
  • Christopher Straus
    • 1
  • Brian Funaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of RadiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations