CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1079–1085 | Cite as

Study of the Impact of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) on Endometrial Microvessel Density (MVD) and Angiogenesis

  • Guosheng Tan
  • Xianhong Xiang
  • Wenbo Guo
  • Bing Zhang
  • Wei Chen
  • Jianyong YangEmail author
Laboratory Investigation



To investigate the influence of uterine artery embolization (UAE) on endometrial microvessel density (MVD) and angiogenesis.


Sixty female guinea pigs were divided into two groups, the control group (n = 15) and the UAE treatment group (n = 45). In the UAE group, tris–acryl gelatin microspheres were used to generate embolization. Animals were further divided into three subgroups, A1, A2, and A3 (n = 15 for each subgroup), with uterine specimens collected at 7–15, 16–30, and 31–45 days after UAE, respectively. Immunostaining for factor VIII and CD105 was performed to identify total endometrial MVD (MVDFVIII) and CD105-positive angiogenesis (MVDCD105) at the indicated time points after UAE.


Quantitative analysis revealed that MVDFVIII significantly decreased in the A1 (11.40 ± 2.76, p < 0.05) and A2 (15.37 ± 3.06, p < 0.05) groups compared to the control group (19.40 ± 2.50), and was restored to normal in the A3 group (18.77 ± 2.69). UAE caused a temporal up-regulation of MVDCD105-positive angiogenesis in the A1 group (9.33 ± 2.37, p < 0.05) and the A2 group (11.63 ± 1.56, p < 0.05) compared to the control group (7.12 ± 1.67), and the MVDCD105 value returned to normal in the A3 group (8.07 ± 1.97).


UAE caused a temporal decrease in endometrial MVD that reversed over time as a result of the increase of CD105-positive angiogenesis. Although the UAE-induced reduction of endometrial MVD was reversible, its long-term effect on endometrial receptivity still needs further study.


Angiogenesis Endometrium Microvessel density (MVD) Uterine artery embolization (UAE) 



This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; Grant 81171442/H1816). The authors thank Yu Dong and Canqiao Luo from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University for their help in the pathological and immunohistological experiments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Goodwin SC, Bradley LD, Lipman JC et al (2006) Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: a multicenter comparative study. Fertil Steril 85:14–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Narayan A, Lee AS, Kuo GP et al (2010) Uterine artery embolization versus abdominal myomectomy: a long-term clinical outcome comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:1011–1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratby MJ, Walker WJ (2009) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic adenomyosis—mid-term results. Eur J Radiol 70:128–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lessey BA (2000) The role of the endometrium during embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 6:39–50Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Critchley HO, Saunders PT (2009) Hormone receptor dynamics in a receptive human endometrium. Reprod Sci 16:191–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL et al (2002) Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial and subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 78:245–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lilic V, Tubic-Pavlovic A, Radovic-Janosevic D (2007) Assessment of endometrial receptivity by color Doppler and ultrasound imaging. Med Pregl 60:237–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhuang WQ, Tan GS, Guo WB et al (2012) A pilot study of uterine artery embolization with tris–acryl gelatin microspheres in guinea pigs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:628–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caligioni CS (2009) Assessing reproductive status/stages in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci Appendix 4:Appendix 4IGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naderali EK, Wray S (1999) Modulation of force induced by pH in the guinea-pig uterus examined at two stages of the oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 117:153–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weidner N (1995) Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer. Am J Pathol 147:9–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maruyama T, Yoshimura Y (2008) Molecular and cellular mechanisms for differentiation and regeneration of the uterine endometrium. Endocr J 55:795–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR et al (2004) Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Hum Reprod 19:330–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    da Silva BB, Lopes-Costa PV, dos Santos AR et al (2009) Comparison of three vascular endothelial markers in the evaluation of microvessel density in breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 30:285–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duff SE, Li C, Garland JM et al (2003) CD105 is important for angiogenesis: evidence and potential applications. FASEB J 17:984–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dallas NA, Samuel S, Xia L et al (2008) Endoglin (CD105): a marker of tumor vasculature and potential target for therapy. Clin Cancer Res 14:1931–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Czekierdowski A, Czekierdowska S, Czuba B et al (2008) Microvessel density assessment in benign and malignant endometrial changes. J Physiol Pharmacol 59(suppl 4):45–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fan X, Heijnen CJ, van der Kooij MA et al (2009) The role and regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in brain development and neonatal hypoxic–ischemic brain injury. Brain Res Rev 62:99–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schipani E, Maes C, Carmeliet G et al (2009) Regulation of osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling by HIFs and VEGF. J Bone Miner Res 24:1347–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guosheng Tan
    • 1
  • Xianhong Xiang
    • 1
  • Wenbo Guo
    • 1
  • Bing Zhang
    • 1
  • Wei Chen
    • 1
  • Jianyong Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Interventional RadiologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations