CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 970–977 | Cite as

Is There a Role for Empiric Gastroduodenal Artery Embolization in the Management of Patients with Active Upper GI Hemorrhage?

  • Shaheen Dixon
  • Victoria Chan
  • Vivek Shrivastava
  • Susan Anthony
  • Raman Uberoi
  • Mark Bratby
Clinical Investigation



To assess the relative efficacy of empiric gastroduodenal artery (GDA) embolization in reducing recurrent hemorrhage compared to image-guided targeted embolization.


Data were retrospectively collected for consecutive patients who had catheter angiography for major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from May 2008 to November 2010 (n = 40). The total number of cases were divided into two main groups according to angiographic findings: those that demonstrated a site of hemorrhage on catheter angiography (group 1, n = 13), and those where the site of hemorrhage was not identified on catheter angiography (group 2, n = 27). Group 2 was then further divided into patients who received empiric embolization (group 2a, n = 20) and those who had no embolization performed after angiography (group 2b, n = 7).


The technical and clinical success rates for embolization in groups 1 and 2a were, respectively, 100 vs. 95 %, and 85 vs. 80 %. There was no statistical significance in the recurrent hemorrhage rate, reintervention rate, or 30 day mortality between targeted and empiric embolization groups. There were no complications attributed to embolization within this study cohort.


Cases of duodenal-related major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage where no embolization is performed have poor outcome. Empiric embolization of the GDA in patients with major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage refractory to endoscopic treatment appears to be a safe and effective treatment, with low reintervention rates and good clinical outcome comparable to patients where the site of hemorrhage is localized and embolized with computed tomographic angiography or catheter angiography and embolized.


Angiography Embolization Gastroduodenal artery Upper gastrointestinal bleeding 


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors also declare there are no potential benefits in any form from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of the article or to any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    Kim JH, Shin JH, Yoon HK et al (2009) Angiographically negative acute arterial upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: incidence, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes. Korean J Radiol 10:384–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schenker MP, Duszak R, Soulen MC et al (2001) Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and transcatheter embolotherapy: clinical and technical factors impacting success and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1263–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loffroy R, Rao P, Ota S et al (2010) Embolization of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resistant to endoscopic treatment: results and predictors of recurrent bleeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1088–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mirsadraee S, Tirukonda P, Nicholson A et al (2010) Embolization for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage: a systematic review. Clin Radiol 66:500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ichiro I, Shushi H, Akihiko I, Yasuhiko I, Yasuyuki Y (2011) Empiric transcatheter arterial embolization for massive bleeding from duodenal ulcers: efficacy and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:911–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lang EV, Picus D, Marx ME et al (1992) Massive upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage with normal findings on arteriography: value of prophylactic embolization of the left gastric artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:547–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seif HMA, Moustafa EFA (2010) Prophylactic embolization of the left gastric artery in cases with massive upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage with normal angiographic findings. Arab J Gastroenterol 7:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aina R, Oliva VL, Therasse E et al (2001) Arterial embolotherapy for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: outcome assessment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:195–2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Padia SA, Geiisinger MA, Newman JS et al (2009) Effectiveness of coil embolization in angiographically detectable versus non-detectable sources of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:461–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loffroy R, Guiu B, D’Athis P et al (2009) Arterial embolotherapy for endoscopically unmanageable acute gastroduodenal haemorrhage: predictors of early rebleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:515–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poultsides GA, Kim CJ, Orlando R et al (2008) Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal haemorrhage; safety, efficacy and predictors of outcome. Arch Surg 143:457–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman DA, Keller FA, Katon RM et al (1984) Arterial embolization for massive upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in poor surgical candidates. Gastroenterology 86:876–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Defreyne L, Vanlangenhove P, De Vos M et al (2001) Embolization as a first approach with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Radiology 218:739–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Wispelaere JF, De Ronde T, Trigaux JP et al (2002) Duodenal ulcer hemorrhage treated by embolization: results in 28 patients. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 65:6–11PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaheen Dixon
    • 1
  • Victoria Chan
    • 1
  • Vivek Shrivastava
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan Anthony
    • 1
  • Raman Uberoi
    • 1
  • Mark Bratby
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe John Radcliffe HospitalHeadington, OxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHull Royal InfirmaryHullUK

Personalised recommendations