CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 176–182

Pain Analysis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation—Initial Observations

  • Govindarajan Narayanan
  • Tatiana Froud
  • Kaming Lo
  • Katuska J. Barbery
  • Evelyn Perez-Rojas
  • Jose Yrizarry
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively compare the postprocedure pain of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with irreversible electroporation (IRE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods

This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant, institutional review board–approved study compared postprocedure pain in 21 patients (15 men, six women; mean age 61.5 years) who underwent IRE of 29 intrahepatic lesions (mean size 2.20 cm) in 28 IRE sessions with 22 patients (16 men, six women; mean age 60.2 years) who underwent RFA of 27 lesions (mean size 3.38 cm) in 25 RFA sessions. Pain was determined by patient-disclosed scores with an 11-point numerical rating scale and 24 h cumulative hydromorphone use from patient-controlled analgesia pump. Complications were noted. Statistical significance was evaluated by Fisher’s exact test, the Chi-square test, and Student’s t test.

Results

There was no significant difference in the cumulative hydromorphone dose (1.54 mg (IRE) vs. 1.24 mg (RFA); P = 0.52) and in the mean pain score (1.96 (IRE) vs. 2.25 (RFA); P = 0.70). In nine (32.14 %) of 28 IRE sessions and 11 (44.0 %) of 25 RFA sessions, patients reported no pain. Complications occurred in three (10.7 %) of 28 IRE treatments and included pneumothorax (n = 1), pleural effusion (n = 1), and bleeding in the form of hemothorax (n = 1); one (4 %) of 25 RFA treatments included burn.

Conclusion

IRE is comparable to RFA in the amount of pain that patients experience and the amount of pain medication self-administered. Both modalities were well tolerated by patients. Prospective, randomized trials are necessary to further evaluate these findings.

Keywords

Irreversible electroporation Radiofrequency ablation Pain 

References

  1. 1.
    MedlinePlus. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD. Hepatocellular carcinoma. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000280.htm. Accessed 30 May 2012
  2. 2.
    Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B (2005) Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng 33:223–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee EW, Chen C, Prieto VE et al (2010) Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation. Radiology 255:426–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubinsky B, Onik G, Mikus P (2007) Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality—clinical implications. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teratani T, Yoshida H, Shiina S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in so-called high-risk locations. Hepatology 43:1101–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahvi DM, Lee FT Jr (1999) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic malignancies: is heat better than cold? Ann Surg 230:9–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg SN, Dupuy DE (2001) Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities, part 1. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1021–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Onik G, Mikus P, Rubinsky B (2007) Irreversible electroporation: implications for prostrate ablation. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:295–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maor E, Ivorra A, Rubinsky B (2009) Non thermal irreversible electroporation: novel technology for vascular smooth muscle cell ablation. PLoS One 4(e4757):1–9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maor E, Rubinsky B (2010) Endovascular non-thermal irreversible electroporation: a finite element analysis. ASME J Biomech Eng 132:031008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maor E, Ivorra A, Leor J, Rubinsky B (2007) The effect of irreversible electroporation on blood vessels. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:307–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dupuy DE, Aswad B, Ng T (2011) Irreversible electroporation in a swine lung model. Cardiocasc Intervent Radiol 34:391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee EW, Thai S, Kee ST (2010) Irreversible electroporation: a novel image-guided cancer therapy. Gut Liver 4:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neal RE 2nd, Singh R, Hatcher HC et al (2010) Treatment of breast cancer through the application of irreversible electroporation using a novel minimally invasive single needle electrode. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:295–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charpentier KP, Wolf F, Noble L et al (2010) Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: a pilot study. HPB 12:348–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ et al (2011) Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:611–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ball C, Thomson KR, Kavnoudias H (2010) Irreversible electroporation: a new challenge in “out of operating theater” anesthesia. Anesth Analg 110:1305–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Govindarajan Narayanan
    • 1
  • Tatiana Froud
    • 1
  • Kaming Lo
    • 2
  • Katuska J. Barbery
    • 1
  • Evelyn Perez-Rojas
    • 1
  • Jose Yrizarry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyMiller School of Medicine, University of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthMiller School of Medicine, University of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations