CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 192–197 | Cite as

Improvement of Stent Retriever Design and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Flow Model

  • Katharina Wenger
  • Frank Nagl
  • Marlies Wagner
  • Joachim Berkefeld
Laboratory Investigation



In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical intracranial thrombectomy comparing the newly developed Aperio stent retriever and standard devices for stroke treatment.


The Aperio (A), with an increased working length of 4 cm and a special cell design for capturing and withholding clots, was compared to three benchmark devices: the Solitaire retrievable stent (B), the Merci X6 (C), and the Merci L5 retriever (D). In a vascular glass model with pulsatile flow, reminiscent of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, we repeatedly induced occlusion by generating thrombi via a modified Chandler loop system. The numbers of recanalization attempts, peripheral embolizations, and recanalizations at the site of occlusion were recorded during 10 retrieval experiments with each device.


Eleven devices were able to remove the blood clots from the occluded branch. In 34 of 40 experiments, restoration of flow was obtained in 1–3 attempts. The main differences between the study devices were observed in terms of clot withholding and fragmentation during retrieval. Although there was only one fragmentation recorded for device A, disengagement of the whole clot or peripheral embolization of fragments occurred more frequently (5–7 times) with devices B, C, and D.


In a vascular model, the design of device A was best at capturing and withholding thrombi during retrieval. Further study will be necessary to see whether this holds true in clinical applications.


Acute stroke Interventional thrombectomy Stent retriever 

Supplementary material

270_2012_420_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 11 kb)


  1. 1.
    Bhatia R, Hill MD, Shobha N et al (2010) Low rates of acute recanalization with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke: real-world experience and a call for action. Stroke 41:2254–2258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J et al (2008) Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 39:1205–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulcsar Z, Bonvin C, Pereira VM et al (2010) Penumbra system: a novel mechanical thrombectomy device for large-vessel occlusions in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 31:628–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becktepe JS, You SJ, Berkefeld J et al (2011) Clinical outcome after mechanical recanalization as mono- or adjunctive therapy in acute stroke: importance of time to recanalization. Cerebrovasc Dis 32:211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roth C, Papanagiotou P, Behnke S et al (2010) Stent-assisted mechanical recanalization for treatment of acute intracerebral artery occlusions. Stroke 41:2559–2567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fesl G, Patzig M, Holtmannspoetter M et al. (2011) Endovascular mechanical recanalisation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior circulation stroke: the impact of a new temporary stent. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0317-5
  7. 7.
    Castaño C, Dorado L, Guerrero C et al (2010) Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 41:1836–1840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Machi P, Costalat V, Lobotesis K et al (2012) Solitaire FR thrombectomy system: immediate results in 56 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 4:62–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loh Y, Jahan R, McArthur DL (2010) Recanalization rates decrease with increasing thrombectomy attempts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:935–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schreiber SJ, Gottschalk S, Weih M et al (2000) Assessment of blood flow velocity and diameter of the middle cerebral artery during the acetazolamide provocation test by use of transcranial doppler sonography and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1207–1211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robbie LA, Young SP, Bennett B, Booth NA (1997) Thrombi formed in a Chandler loop mimic human arterial thrombi in structure and RAI-1 content and distribution. Thromb Haemost 77:510–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poole CF (1959) A study of artificial thrombi produced by a modification of Chandler’s method. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 44:377–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liebig T, Reinartz J, Hannes R (2008) Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization. Neuroradiology 50:43–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mordasini P, Frabetti N, Gralla J (2011) In vivo evaluation of the first dedicated combined flow-restoration and mechanical thrombectomy device in a swine model of acute vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:294–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Wenger
    • 1
  • Frank Nagl
    • 2
  • Marlies Wagner
    • 1
  • Joachim Berkefeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Neuroradiology, University of Frankfurt am MainFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Acandis GmbH & Co KGPforzheimGermany

Personalised recommendations