Endoleak is the most common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair. The most common type of endoleak, a type II endoleak, typically follows a benign course and is only treated when associated with increasing aneurysm size. In this case report, we describe a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm due to a late, type II endoleak occurring 10 years after endovascular aneurysm repair that was successfully treated by transarterial embolization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflict of interest
B. F. received an honorarium from EV3 for lecturing services. S. G and J. L have no conflicts of interest.
Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS (2005) Improving aneurysm-related outcomes: nationwide benefits of endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 43:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ et al (2004) Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:128–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Marrewijk CJ, Buth J, Harris PL et al (2002) Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 35:461–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC et al (2007) Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg 46:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolia AJ, Landis R, Lamparello P et al (2005) Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: natural history. Radiology 235:683–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P et al (2000) Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 32:739–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinchliffe RJ, Singh-Ranger R, Davidson IR et al (2001) Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to type II endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:563–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politz JK, Newman VS, Stewart MT (2000) Late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after AneuRx repair: a report of three cases. J Vasc Surg 31:599–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timaran CH, Ohki T, Rhee SJ et al (2004) Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 39:1157–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frasen GA, Vallabhaneni SR, van Marrewijk CJ et al (2003) Rupture of infra-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: a series from EUROSTAR registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:293–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevala T, Biancari F, Manninen H et al (2010) Type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: effectiveness of embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:278–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasirajan K, Matteson B, Marek JM et al (2003) Technique and results of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II lumbar endoleak. J Vasc Surg 38:61–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan MK, Barbato J, Compton CN et al (2004) Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 40:430–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Tuite CM et al (2000) Diagnosis and treatment of inferior mesenteric arterial endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology 215:409–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chuter TA, Faruqi RM, Sawhney R et al (2001) Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 34:98–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solis MM, Ayerdi J, Babcock GA et al (2002) Mechanism of failure in the treatment of type II endoleak with percutaneous coil embolization. J Vasc Surg 36:485–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieners G, Meyer F, Halloul Z et al (2010) Detection of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic repair: comparison between magnetic resonance angiography and blood-pool contrast agent and dual-phase computed tomography angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1135–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar