CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 1531–1534

Irreversible Electroporation for Focal Ablation at the Porta Hepatis

  • Veeru Kasivisvanathan
  • Ankur Thapar
  • Youssof Oskrochi
  • John Picard
  • Edward L. S. Leen
Case Report

Abstract

Patients with chemotherapy-refractory liver metastases who are not candidates for surgery may be treated with focal ablation techniques with established survival benefits. Irreversible electroporation is the newest of these and has the putative advantages of a nonthermal action, preventing damage to adjacent biliary structures and bowel. This report describes the use of irreversible electroporation in a 61-year-old man with a solitary chemoresistant liver metastasis unsuitable for radiofrequency ablation as a result of its proximity to the porta hepatis. At 3 months, tumor size was decreased on computed tomography from 28 × 19 to 20 × 17 mm, representing stable disease according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. This corresponded to a decrease in tumor volume size from 5.25 to 3.16 cm3. There were no early or late complications. Chemoresistant liver metastases in the proximity of the porta hepatis that are considered to be too high a risk for conventional surgery or thermal ablation may be considered for treatment by the novel ablation technique of irreversible electroporation.

Keywords

Ablation Irreversible electroporation Liver Metastasis Tumor Ultrasound 

Supplementary material

270_2012_363_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1846 kb)
270_2012_363_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 1646 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tiong L, Maddern GJ (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:1210–1224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pathak S, Jones R, Tang JM et al (2011) Ablative therapies for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 13:e252–e265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esser AT, Smith KC, Gowrishankar TR, Weaver JC (2007) Towards solid tumor treatment by irreversible electroporation: intrinsic redistribution of fields and currents in tissue. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:261–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee EW, Chen C, Prieto VE et al (2010) Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation. Radiology 255:426–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee EW, Thai S, Kee ST (2010) Irreversible electroporation: a novel image-guided cancer therapy. Gut Liver 4(Suppl 1):S99–S104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ et al (2011) Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:611–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pech M, Janitzky A, Wendler JJ et al (2011) Irreversible electroporation of renal cell carcinoma: a first-in-man phase I clinical study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ball C, Thomson KR, Kavnoudias H (2010) Irreversible electroporation: a new challenge in “out of operating theater” anesthesia. Anesth Analg 110:1305–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crocetti L, de Baere T, Lencioni R (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Reissfelder C et al (2006) Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases during laparotomy. First clinical experiences with a new multipolar ablation concept. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)—update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veeru Kasivisvanathan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Ankur Thapar
    • 2
  • Youssof Oskrochi
    • 2
  • John Picard
    • 3
  • Edward L. S. Leen
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of AnaesthesiaImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Experimental MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.Charing Cross HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations