Procedural Predictors of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
To identify factors impacting outcome in patients undergoing interventions for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing endovascular therapy for AIS secondary during a 30 month period. Outcome was based on modified Rankin score at 3- to 6-month follow-up. Recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score 2 to 3. Collaterals were graded based on pial circulation from the anterior cerebral artery either from an ipsilateral injection in cases of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion or contralateral injection for internal carotid artery terminus (ICA) occlusion as follows: no collaterals (grade 0), some collaterals with retrograde opacification of the distal MCA territory (grade 1), and good collaterals with filling of the proximal MCA (M2) branches or retrograde opacification up to the occlusion site (grade 2). Occlusion site was divided into group 1 (ICA), group 2 (MCA with or without contiguous M2 involvement), and group 3 (isolated M2 or M3 branch occlusion).
A total of 89 patients were studied. Median age and National Institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score was 71 and 15 years, respectively. Favorable outcome was seen in 49.4% of patients and mortality in 25.8% of patients. Younger age (P = 0.006), lower baseline NIHSS score (P = 0.001), successful recanalization (P < 0.0001), collateral support (P = 0.0008), distal occlusion (P = 0.001), and shorter procedure duration (P = 0.01) were associated with a favorable outcome. Factors affecting successful recanalization included younger age (P = 0.01), lower baseline NIHSS score (P = 0.05), collateral support (P = 0.01), and shorter procedure duration (P = 0.03). An ICA terminus occlusion (P < 0.0001), lack of collaterals (P = 0.0003), and unsuccessful recanalization (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with mortality.
Angiographic findings and preprocedure variables can help prognosticate procedure outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for AIS.
KeywordsNeurointerventions Endovascular treatment Stroke therapy Stroke
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Miteff F, Faulder KC, Goh AC, Steinfort BS, Sue C, Harrington TJ (2011) Mechanical thrombectomy with a self-expanding retrievable intracranial stent (Solitaire AB): experience in 26 patients with acute cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(6):1078–81Google Scholar
- 11.Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ (2011) Patient outcomes with endovascular embolectomy therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a study of the National inpatient sample: 2006 to 2008. StrokeGoogle Scholar
- 19.Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Silver B, Linfante I, Caplan LR et al (2002) Is the association of National institutes of health stroke scale scores and acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right- and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke 33(4):954–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nogueira RG, Liebeskind DS, Sung G, Duckwiler G, Smith WS (2009) Predictors of good clinical outcomes, mortality, and successful revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia (MERCI) and multi MERCI trials. Stroke 40(12):3777–3783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M (1998) PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT Investigators. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. Stroke 29(1):4–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Qureshi AI (2002) New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 50(6):1405–1414 (discussion 1414–1415)Google Scholar