CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1199–1207 | Cite as

Ovarian Artery Embolization in Patients With Collateral Supply to Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomata

  • C. Scheurig-Muenkler
  • A. Poellinger
  • M. Wagner
  • B. Hamm
  • T. J. KroenckeEmail author
Clinical Investigation



To evaluate the safety and outcome of ovarian artery embolization (OAE) in patients with collateral supply to symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen patients with relevant leiomyoma perfusion by way of enlarged ovarian arteries underwent additional OAE during the same (N = 10) or a second procedure (N = 3). Uterine artery embolization (UAE) was performed bilaterally in 10 and unilaterally in 2 patients with a single artery. One patient had no typical uterine arteries but bilaterally enlarged ovarian arteries, prompting bilateral OAE. OAE was accomplished with coil embolization in one and particle embolization in 12 patients. Symptoms before therapy and clinical outcome were assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after embolization was available in 11 of 13 patients and was used to determine the percentage of fibroid infarction.


UAE and OAE were technically successful in all patients. One patient experienced prolonged irritation at the puncture site. Median clinical follow-up time was 16 months (range 4–37). Ten of 13 patients showed improvement or complete resolution of clinical symptoms. One patient reported only slight improvement of her symptoms. These women presented with regular menses. Two patients (15%), 47 and 48 years, both with unilateral OAE, reported permanent amenorrhea directly after embolization. Their symptoms completely resolved. Seven patients showed complete and 4 showed >90% fibroid infarction after embolization therapy.


OAE is technically safe and effective in patients with ovarian artery collateral supply to symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. The risk of permanent amenorrhea observed in this study is similar to the reported incidence after UAE.


Uterine artery embolization Uterine fibroid embolization Urogenital Uterine fibroid Ovarian artery 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Lohle PN, Voogt MJ, De Vries J, Smeets AJ, Vervest HA, Lampmann LE, Boekkooi PF (2008) Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:319–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, Peterson E, Pron G, Li S, Myers ER, Fibroid Registry for Outcomes Data (FIBROID) Registry Steering Committee and Core Site Investigators (2008) Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry. Obstet Gynecol 111:22–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spies JB, Bruno J, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Magee ST, Ascher SA, Jha RC (2005) Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 106:933–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freed MM, Spies JB (2010) Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: a review of current outcomes. Semin Reprod Med 28:235–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, van Rooij WJ, Weimar EAM, Boekkooi PF, Lampmann LE, Vervest HAM, Lohle PN (2010) Uterine artery embolization in patients with a large fibroid burden: long-term clinical and MR follow-up. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33(5):943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Poellinger A, Gronewold M, Hamm B (2010) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of infarction predicts clinical outcome. Radiology 255(3):834–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Kin Y, Nozaki T (2008) Infarction of uterine fibroids after embolization: relationship between postprocedural enhanced MRI findings and long-term clinical outcomes. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Jacob D, Kardache M, Dahan H, Lassau JP, Rymer R (1999) Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:989–994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banovac F, Lin R, Shah D, White A, Pelage JP, Spies JB (2007) Angiographic and interventional options in obstetric and gynecologic emergencies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 34:599–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Razavi MK, Wolanske KA, Hwang GL, Sze DY, Kee ST, Dake MD (2002) Angiographic classification of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization. Radiology 224:707–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Kluner C, Taupitz M, Schnorr J, Hamm B (2006) Uterine fibroids: contrast-enhanced MR angiography to predict ovarian artery supply–initial experience. Radiology 241:181–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pelage JP, Walker WJ, Le Dref O, Rymer R (2003) Ovarian artery: angiographic appearance, embolization and relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 26:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Lampmann LE, Boekkooi PF, Kissner L, Kluner C, Weichert W, Hamm B, Lohle PN (2008) Acrylamido polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for uterine artery embolization: 12-month clinical and MR imaging results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:47–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abbara S, Nikolic B, Pelage JP, Banovac F, Spies JB (2007) Frequency and extent of uterine perfusion via ovarian arteries observed during uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1558–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yousefi S, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, White A, Banovac F, Hahn WY, Spies JB (2006) Repeat uterine artery embolization: indications and technical findings. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1923–1929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White A, Banovac F, Yousefi S, Slack RS, Spies JB (2007) Uterine fibroid embolization: the utility of aortography in detecting ovarian artery collateral supply. Radiology 244:291–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barth MM, Spies JB (2003) Ovarian artery embolization supplementing uterine embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1177–1182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spies JB, Roth AR, Gonsalves SM, Murphy-Skrzyniarz KM (2001) Ovarian function after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: assessment with use of serum follicle stimulating hormone assay. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim HS, Thonse VR, Judson K, Vang R (2007) Utero-ovarian anastomosis: histopathologic correlation after uterine artery embolization with or without ovarian artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:31–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tropeano G, Di Stasi C, Litwicka K, Romano D, Draisci G, Mancuso S (2004) Uterine artery embolization for fibroids does not have adverse effects on ovarian reserve in regularly cycling women younger than 40 years. Fertil Steril 81:1055–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tropeano G, Di Stasi C, Amoroso S, Gualano MR, Bonomo L, Scambia G (2010) Long-term effects of uterine fibroid embolization on ovarian reserve: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.007
  22. 22.
    Chrisman HB, Saker MB, Ryu RK, Nemcek AA, Gerbie MV, Milad MP, Smith SJ, Sewall LE, Omary RA, Vogelzang RL (2000) The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:699–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Tsuchida Y, Nozaki T (2008) Amenorrhea and resumption of menstruation after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 103:217–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greendale GA, Lee NP, Arriola ER (1999) The menopause. Lancet 353:571–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Broekmans FJM, de Jong FH, Themmen APN, Birnie E, Reekers JA, Ankum WM (2007) Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomy. Hum Reprod 22:1996–2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pastor CL, Vanderhoof VN, Lim LCL, Calis KA, Premkumar A, Guerrero NT, Nelson LM (2005) Pilot study investigating the age-related decline in ovarian function of regularly menstruating normal women. Fertil Steril 84:1462–1469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Beregi JP, Nonent M, Robert Y, Cosson M et al (2003) Limited uterine artery embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:15–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nöthling JO, De Cramer KG, Gerber D, Kammer VR (2006) Luteal and follicular count in bitches: assessment by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Theriogenology 66:1343–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Scheurig-Muenkler
    • 1
  • A. Poellinger
    • 1
  • M. Wagner
    • 1
  • B. Hamm
    • 1
  • T. J. Kroencke
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations