CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 156–165 | Cite as

Renal Artery Embolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Kidney Model: Effect of Small and Narrowly Calibrated Microparticles as Embolization Material on Coagulation Diameter, Volume, and Shape

  • C. M. SommerEmail author
  • N. Kortes
  • S. Zelzer
  • F. U. Arnegger
  • U. Stampfl
  • N. Bellemann
  • T. Gehrig
  • F. Nickel
  • H. G. Kenngott
  • C. Mogler
  • T. Longerich
  • H. P. Meinzer
  • G. M. Richter
  • H. U. Kauczor
  • B. A. Radeleff
Laboratory Investigation


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of renal artery embolization with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles on the coagulation diameter, volume, and shape of radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) in porcine kidneys. Forty-eight RFAs were performed in 24 kidneys of 12 pigs. In 6 animals, bilateral renal artery embolization was performed with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles. Upper and lower kidney poles were ablated with identical system parameters. Applying three-dimensional segmentation software, RFAs were segmented on registered 2 mm-thin macroscopic slices. Length, depth, width, volume_segmented, and volume_calculated were determined to describe the size of the RFAs. To evaluate the shape of the RFAs, depth-to-width ratio (perfect symmetry-to-lesion length was indicated by a ratio of 1), sphericity ratio (perfect sphere was indicated by a sphericity ratio of 1), eccentricity (perfect sphere was indicated by an eccentricity of 0), and circularity (perfect circle was indicated by a circularity of 1) were determined. Embolized compared with nonembolized RFAs showed significantly greater depth (23.4 ± 3.6 vs. 17.2 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.001) and width (20.1 ± 2.9 vs. 12.6 ± 3.7 mm; p < 0.001); significantly larger volume_segmented (8.6 ± 3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 ml; p < 0.001) and volume_calculated (8.4 ± 3.0 ml vs. 3.3 ± 1.1 ml; p < 0.001); significantly lower depth-to-width (1.17 ± 0.10 vs. 1.48 ± 0.44; p < 0.05), sphericity (1.55 ± 0.44 vs. 1.96 ± 0.43; p < 0.01), and eccentricity (0.84 ± 0.61 vs. 1.73 ± 0.91; p < 0.01) ratios; and significantly greater circularity (0.62 ± 0.14 vs. 0.45 ± 0.16; p < 0.01). Renal artery embolization with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles affected the coagulation diameter, volume, and shape of RFAs in porcine kidneys. Embolized RFAs were significantly larger and more spherical compared with nonembolized RFAs.


Radiofrequency ablation Transarterial embolization Particles Embozene 3d Segmentation Porcine kidney 

Supplementary material

Movie 1. Three-dimensional segmentation of an embolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 3778 kb)

Movie 2. Three-dimensional segmentation of a nonembolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 4661 kb)


  1. 1.
    Rutherford EE, Cast JE, Breen DJ (2008) Immediate and long-term CT appearances following radiofrequency ablation of renal tumours. Clin Radiol 63:220–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mondshine RT, Owens S, Mondschein JI et al (2008) Combination embolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy for renal cell carcinoma in the setting of coexisting arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:616–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell J, Rosenthal DI, Raskin KA et al (2006) Use of an arterial tourniquet to achieve complete radiofrequency ablation of a renal metastasis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1051–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kyle CC, Wingo MS, Carey RI et al (2008) Diagnostic yield of renal biopsy immediately prior to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study. J Endourol 22:2291–2293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breen DJ, Rutherford EE, Stedman B et al (2007) Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:936–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raman JD, Thomas J, Lucas SM et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation for T1a tumors in a solitary kidney: promising intermediate oncologic and renal function outcomes. Can J Urol 15:3980–3985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veltri A, Calvo A, Tosetti I et al (2006) Experiences in US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of 44 renal tumors in 31 patients: analysis of predictors for complications and technical success. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:811–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stern JM, Svatek R, Park S et al (2007) Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours. BJU Int 100:287–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lohr M, Rohde D (2005) Recurrent disease in renal cell carcinoma. “Local recurrence” after kidney-sparing and radical resection. Urologe A 44:358–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tacke J (2007) Interventional oncology in urology. Radiologe 47:1089–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Kobayashi S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation combined with renal arterial embolization for the treatment of unresectable renal cell carcinoma larger than 3.5 cm: initial experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arima K, Yamakado K, Kinbara H et al (2007) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with transarterial embolization is useful for treatment of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma with surgical risk: Results at 2-year mean follow up. Int J Urol 14:585–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marcovich R, Aldana JP, Morgenstern N et al (2003) Optimal lesion assessment following acute radio frequency ablation of porcine kidney: cellular viability or histopathology? J Urol 170:1370–1374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patterson EJ, Scudamore CH, Owen DA et al (1998) Radiofrequency ablation of porcine liver in vivo: effects of blood flow and treatment time on lesion size. Ann Surg 227:559–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung H, Kudo M, Minami Y et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation combined with reduction of hepatic blood flow: effect of lipiodol on coagulation diameter and ablation time in normal pig liver. Hepatogastroenterology 54:701–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang I, Mikityansky I, Wray-Cahen D et al (2004) Effects of perfusion on radiofrequency ablation in swine kidneys. Radiology 231:500–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakai M, Sato M, Sahara S et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation in a porcine liver model: effects of transcatheter arterial embolization with iodized oil on ablation time, maximum output, and coagulation diameter as well as angiographic characteristics. World J Gastroenterol 13:2841–2845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iwamoto T, Kawai N, Sato M et al (2008) Effectiveness of hepatic arterial embolization on radiofrequency ablation volume in a swine model: relationship to portal venous flow and liver parenchymal pressure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1646–1651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Isbert C et al (2006) In vivo evaluation of a novel bipolar radiofrequency device for interstitial thermotherapy of liver tumors during normal and interrupted hepatic perfusion. J Surg Res 133:176–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonomo G, Pedicini V, Monfardini L et al (2010) Bland embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using precise, tightly size-calibrated, anti-inflammatory microparticles: first clinical experience and one-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bayne K (1998) Developing guidelines on the care and use of animals. Ann NY Acad Sci 862:105–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vogt FM, Antoch G, Veit P et al (2007) Morphologic and functional changes in nontumorous liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo model: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, ultrasound, and CT. J Nucl Med 48:1836–1844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC et al (2000) Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Cancer 88:2452–2463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crowley JD, Shelton J, Iverson AJ et al (2001) Laparoscopic and computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tissue: acute and chronic effects in an animal model. Urology 57:976–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burdio F, Navarro A, Sousa R et al (2006) Evolving technology in bipolar perfused radiofrequency ablation: assessment of efficacy, predictability and safety in a pig liver model. Eur Radiol 16:1826–1834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nakada SY, Jerde TJ, Warner TF et al (2003) Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: comparison with monopolar radiofrequency ablation. J Endourol 17:927–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laeseke PF, Lee FT Jr, Sampson LA et al (2009) Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the kidney: high-power triaxial antennas create larger ablation zones than similarly sized internally cooled electrodes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1224–1229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hsu TH, Fidler ME, Gill IS (2007) Radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: acute and chronic histology in porcine model. Urology 56:872–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH et al (2007) In vivo efficiency of multipolar radiofrequency ablation with two bipolar electrodes: a comparative experimental study in pig kidney. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1553–1560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Schenk M et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation: in vivo comparison of four commercially available devices in pig livers. Radiology 232:482–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Denys AL, De Baere T, Kuoch V et al (2003) Radio-frequency tissue ablation of the liver: in vivo and ex vivo experiments with four different systems. Eur Radiol 13:2346–2352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS (2001) Radiofrequency tissue ablation: physical principles and techniques for increasing coagulation necrosis. Hepatogastroenterology 48:359–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goldberg SN, Hahn PF, Tanabe KK et al (1998) Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: does perfusion-mediated tissue cooling limit coagulation necrosis? J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:101–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldberg SN, Hahn PF, Halpern EF et al (1998) Radio-frequency tissue ablation: effect of pharmacologic modulation of blood flow on coagulation diameter. Radiology 209:761–767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yamasaki T, Kurokawa F, Shirahashi H et al (2002) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during occlusion of hepatic blood flow. Comparison with standard percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy. Cancer 95:2353–2360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stampfl S, Bellemann N, Stampfl U et al (2009) Arterial distribution characteristics of embozene particles and comparison with other spherical embolic agents in the porcine acute embolization model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1597–1607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stampfl S, Stampfl U, Bellemann N et al (2009) Immunohistochemical characterization of specific inflammatory tissue reactions following embolization with four different spherical agents in the minipig kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:936–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stampfl S, Bellemann N, Stampfl U et al (2008) Inflammation and recanalization of four different spherical embolization agents in the porcine kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:577–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stampfl U, Stampfl S, Bellemann N et al (2009) Experimental liver embolization with four different spherical embolic materials: impact on inflammatory tissue and foreign body reaction. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kauffmann GW, Richter GM, Roeren T (1991) Current status of embolization materials. Rontgenpraxis 44:146–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yu SC, Hui JW, Hui EP et al (2009) Embolization efficacy and treatment effectiveness of transarterial therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled comparison of transarterial ethanol ablation with lipiodol-ethanol mixture versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:352–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hirakawa M, Ikeda K, Kawamura Y et al (2008) New ablation procedure for a radiofrequency liver tissue coagulation system using an expandable needle. Liver Int 28:214–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hacker A, Vallo S, Weiss C et al (2005) Minimally invasive treatment of renal cell carcinoma: comparison of 4 different monopolar radiofrequency devices. Eur Urol 48:584–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Burdio F, Berjano EJ, Navarro A et al (2009) Research and development of a new RF-assisted device for bloodless rapid transection of the liver: computational modeling and in vivo experiments. Biomed Eng Online 8:6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Sommer
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Kortes
    • 1
  • S. Zelzer
    • 2
  • F. U. Arnegger
    • 3
  • U. Stampfl
    • 1
  • N. Bellemann
    • 1
  • T. Gehrig
    • 3
  • F. Nickel
    • 3
  • H. G. Kenngott
    • 3
  • C. Mogler
    • 4
  • T. Longerich
    • 4
  • H. P. Meinzer
    • 2
  • G. M. Richter
    • 5
  • H. U. Kauczor
    • 1
  • B. A. Radeleff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Division of Medical and Biological InformaticsGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of General, Abdominal and Transplantation SurgeryUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of General PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  5. 5.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyKlinikum StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations