Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 375–378 | Cite as

Glove Perforations During Interventional Radiological Procedures

  • R. V. LeenaEmail author
  • N. K. Shyamkumar
Technical Note

Abstract

Intact surgical gloves are essential to avoid contact with blood and other body fluids. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of glove perforations during interventional radiological procedures. In this study, a total of 758 gloves used in 94 interventional radiological procedures were examined for perforations. Eleven perforations were encountered, only one of which was of occult type. No significant difference in the frequency of glove perforation was found between the categories with varying time duration.

Keywords

Glove perforation Interventional radiology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank the staff in the interventional radiology suite.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1988) Update: universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other blood borne pathogens in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 37:377–382, 387–388Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1987) Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 36(S2):1S–18SGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams DM, Marx MV, Korobkin M (1991) AIDS risk and risk reduction in the radiology department (commentary). AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:919–921Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansen ME, Bakal CW, Dixon GD et al (1997) Guidelines regarding HIV and other blood borne pathogens in vascular/interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:667–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen ME, McIntire DD, Miller GL III (1992) Occult glove perforations: frequency during interventional radiologic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:131–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kupres K, Rasmussen SE, Albertini JG (2002) Perforation rates for non-sterile examination gloves in routine dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Surg 28:388–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kojima Y, Ohashi M (2005) Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1078–1080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avery CME, Hjort A, Walsh S et al (1998) Glove perforation during surgical extraction of wisdom teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86:23–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansen ME, Miller GL III, Redman HC, McIntire DD (1993) HIV and interventional radiology: a national survey of physician attitudes and behaviours. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:229–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laine T, Aarnio P (2001) How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system. Am J Surg 181:564–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen SL, Kristensen B, Fabrin K (1997) Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 163:163–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovavisarach E, Seedadee C (2002) Randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single and double-gloving methods in gynaecologic surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:519–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naver LPS, Gottrup F (2000) Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Eur J Surg 166:293–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiodiagnosisChristian Medial CollegeVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations