British Society of Interventional Radiology Iliac Artery Angioplasty-Stent Registry III
- 156 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
The objective of this study was to audit current practice in iliac artery intervention in the United Kingdom. In 2001 the British Society of Interventional Radiology Iliac Artery Angioplasty-Stent (BIAS) III registry provided the first national database for iliac intervention. It recommended that data collection needed to continue in order to facilitate the dissemination of comparative data to individual units. BIAS III was designed to continue this work and has a simplified data set with an online submission form. Interventionalists were invited to complete a 3-page tick sheet for all iliac angioplasties and stents. Questions covered risk factors, procedural data, and outcome. Data for 2233 patients were submitted from 37 institutions over a 43-month period. Consultants performed 80% of the procedures, 62% of which were for claudication. Fifty-four percent of lesions were treated with stents and 25% of patients underwent bilateral intervention, resulting in a residual stenosis of <50% in 98%. Ninety-seven percent of procedures had no limb complication and there was a 98% inpatient survival rate. In conclusion, these figures provide an essential benchmark for both audit and patient information. National databases need to be expanded across the range of interventional procedures, and their collection made simple and, preferably, online.
Keywords
British Society of Interventional Radiology Iliac Artery Angioplasty-Stent Registry III ComplicationReferences
- 1.Royal College of Radiologists’ Radiology Service Accreditation Programme. Available at: http://accreditation.rcr.ac.uk/docs/pdf/RAPFinalReport_Oct08.pdf
- 2.General Medical Council: Good Medical Practice 2006. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/maintaining_good_medical_practice/performance.asp
- 3.Tsetis D, Uberoi R (2008) Quality improvement guidelines for endovascular treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 31(2):238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Gaines P, Moss J, Kinsman R (2001) BIAS 1 report. British Society of Interventional Radiology. Dendrite Clinical SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 5.Harris PL, Buth J (2004) An update on the important findings from the EUROSTAR EVAR registry. Vascular 12(1):33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Spiegelhalter DJ (2005) Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 24(8):1185–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Moss J, Uberoi R, Kinsman R, Walton P (2008) BIAS 3 report. British Society of Interventional Radiology. Dendrite Clinical SystemsGoogle Scholar