CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 1165–1173 | Cite as

Treatment of Extraspinal Painful Bone Metastases with Percutaneous Cementoplasty: A Prospective Study of 50 Patients

  • Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti
  • Antonio Manca
  • Cinzia Ortega
  • Giovanni Grignani
  • Felicino DeBernardi
  • Daniele Regge
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous cementoplasty (PC) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in painful extravertebral lytic bone metastases not responding to conventional therapy. Fifty patients (25 females), mean age 64.7 ± 11.2 years, underwent PC after giving informed consent. Procedures were performed under fluoroscopy (1/50) or combined fluoroscopy-CT (49/50) guidance in local anesthesia or under deep sedation in 7 patients with large metastases who underwent radiofrequency thermoablation (RFA) in the same session. Seventy lesions were treated (1-6 per patient; average, 1.4 ± 0.9), arranging in size from 1 to 10 cm (average, 3.6 ± 2.1 cm). Mean volume of PMMA per lesion was 5.9 ± 3.2 ml (range, 1.5–15.0 ml). Pain was prospectively evaluated on an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) before and after the procedure (follow-up, 15 to 36 months). Mean VAS score dropped from 9.1 ± 1.2 (range: 6–10) to 2.1 ± 2.5 (range: 0–9). Mean VAS difference was 7.0 ± 2.3 (range, 1–10; p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Forty-seven of the 50 patients (94%) suspended narcotic drugs, in 22 (44%) pain was controlled with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in 25 (50%) analgesic therapy was suspended, and 13 of 50 (26%) had complete pain regression. In 3 of the 50 patients (6%) pain was not improved. No statistical difference between osteoplasty and osteoplasty plus RFA was found (p = 0.8338, Mann–Whitney test). No complications arose during the procedure. Two patients with metastases in the femoral diaphysis reported a fracture 1 month after treatment. PC is effective to obtain pain regression in painful bone metastases not responding to conventional analgesic therapy; bone consolidation cannot be obtained in the diaphysis of long weight-bearing bones.

Keywords

Osteoplasty Cementoplasty Bone metastases Radiofrequency ablation Pain treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all the nurses and technicians for their kind and continuous collaboration.

References

  1. 1.
    Dewar JA (2004) Managing metastatic bone pain. BMJ 329:812–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roos DE, Fisher RJ (2003) Radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: an overview of the overviews. Clin Oncol 15:342–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ross JR, Saunders Y, Edmonds PM et al (2003) Systematic review of role of bisphosphonates on skeletal morbidity in metastatic cancer. BMJ 327:469–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS et al (2004) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, phase III, double-blind, placebo–controlled trial. Cancer 100:2613–2621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R et al (2004) Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:879–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88:1082–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Wit R, van Dam F, Loonstra S et al (2001) The Amsterdam Pain Management Index compared to eight frequently used outcome measures to evaluate the adequacy of pain treatment in cancer patients with chronic pain. Pain 91:339–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meuser T, Pietruck C, Radbruch L et al (2001) Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93:247–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Urch C (2004) The pathophysiology of cancer-induced bone pain: current understanding. Palliative Medicine 18:267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goetz MP, Rubin J, Callstrom M et al (2004) Percutaneous US and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 15:300–306Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poggi G, Gatti C, Melazzini M et al (2003) Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of malignant osteolyses. Anticancer Res 23(6D):4977–4983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gronemeyer DH, Schirp S, Gevargez A (2002) Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of spinal tumors: preliminary experience with an expandable array electrode. Cancer J 8(1):33–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cotten A, Deprez X, Migaud H et al (1995) Malignant acetabular osteolyses: percutaneous injection of acrylic bone cement. Radiology 197(1):307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weill A, Kobaiter H, Chiras J (1998) Acetabulum malignancies: technique and impact on pain of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Eur Radiol 8(1):123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marcy PY, Palussiere J, Descamps B et al (2000) Percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic bone metastasis. Support Care Cancer 8(6):500–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hierholzer J, Anselmetti G, Fuchs H et al (2003) Percutaneous osteoplasty as a treatment for painful malignant bone lesions of the pelvis and femur. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(6):773–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Herling M et al (2002) Combined radiofrequency thermal ablation and percutaneous cementoplasty treatment of a pathologic fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(10):1047–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toyota N, Naito A, Kakizawa H et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation therapy combined with cementoplasty for painful bone metastases: initial experience. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 28(5):578–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P et al (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33(2):166–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N et al (1997) Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic metastases or multiple myeloma. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 64(3):177–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B et al (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. RadioGraphics 18:311–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alvarez L, Perez-Higueras A, Quinones D et al (2003) Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J 12(4):3556–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gangi A, Guth S, Imbert JP et al (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results. Radiographics 23(2):e10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kobayashi K, Shimoyama K, Nakamura K et al (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Eur Radiol 15(2):360–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shimony JS, Gilula LA, Zeller AJ et al (2004) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for malignant compression fractures with epidural involvement. Radiology 232(3):846–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamada K, Matsumoto Y, Kita M et al (2004) Long-term pain relief effects in four patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty for metastatic vertebral tumor. J Anesth 18(4):292–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Legroux-Gerot I, Lormeau C, Boutry N et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 23(4):310–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jang JS, Lee SH (2005) Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with radiotherapy in osteolytic metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 2(3):243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scott J, Husskisson BC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2:175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL (2003) Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage 25(5):406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L et al (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94(2):149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ishiyama H, Shibata A, Niino K et al (2004) Relationship between morphine and radiotherapy for management of symptomatic bone metastases from lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 12(10):743–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van der Linden YM, Lok JJ, Steenland E et al (2004) Single fraction radiotherapy is efficacious: a further analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study controlling for the influence of retreatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):528–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wai MS, Mike S, Ines H et al (2004) Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy—a systematic review of the randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD004721 reviewGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Body JJ (2003) Effectiveness and cost of bisphosphonate therapy in tumor bone disease. Cancer 97:859–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miguel R (2000) Interventional treatment of cancer pain: the fourth step in the World Health Organization analgesic ladder? Cancer Control 7(2):149–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R et al (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 98(Suppl 1):21–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barragan-Campos HM, Vallee JN, Lo D et al (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: complications. Radiology 238(1):354–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kelekis A, Lovblad KO, Mehdizade A et al (2005) Pelvic osteoplasty in osteolytic metastases: technical approach under fluoroscopic guidance and early clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:81–88PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti
    • 1
  • Antonio Manca
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cinzia Ortega
    • 3
  • Giovanni Grignani
    • 3
  • Felicino DeBernardi
    • 4
  • Daniele Regge
    • 5
  1. 1.Interventional Radiology UnitInstitute for Cancer Research and TreatmentCandiolo, TurinItaly
  2. 2.Biomedical SciencesUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  3. 3.Oncology UnitInstitute for Cancer Research and TreatmentCandiolo, TurinItaly
  4. 4.Anesthesiology UnitInstitute for Cancer Research and TreatmentCandiolo, TurinItaly
  5. 5.Radiology UnitInstitute for Cancer Research and TreatmentCandiolo, TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations