CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 889–896 | Cite as

Early and Late Retrieval of the ALN Removable Vena Cava Filter: Results from a Multicenter Study

  • O. Pellerin
  • F. G. Barral
  • C. Lions
  • L. Novelli
  • J. P. Beregi
  • M. Sapoval
Clinical Investigation


Retrieval of removable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in selected patients is widely practiced. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the feasibility and results of percutaneous removal of the ALN removable filter in a large patient cohort. Between November 2003 and June 2006, 123 consecutive patients were referred for percutaneous extraction of the ALN filter at three centers. The ALN filter is a removable filter that can be implanted through a femoral/jugular vein approach and extracted by the jugular vein approach. Filter removal was attempted after an implantation period of 93 ± 15 days (range, 6–722 days) through the right internal jugular vein approach using the dedicated extraction kit after control inferior vena cavography. Following filter removal, vena cavograms were obtained in all patients. Successful extraction was achieved in all but one case. Among these successful retrievals, additional manipulation using a femoral approach was needed when the apex of the filter was close to the IVC wall in two patients. No immediate IVC complications were observed according to the postimplantation cavography. Neither technical nor clinical differences between early and late filter retrieval were noticed. Our data confirm the safety of ALN filter retrieval up to 722 days after implantation. In infrequent cases, additional endovenous filter manipulation is needed to facilitate extraction.


Vena cava filtration Pulmonary embolism Deep vein thrombosis 



Inferior vena cava


Deep vein thrombosis


Pulmonary embolism


Low molecular weight heparin



We thank John A. Kaufman, M.D., for reviewing the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 12:338(7):409–415Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    PREPIC Study Group (2005) Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112(3):416–422 [Epub 11 July]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al (2006) Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(3):449–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millward SF, Grassi CJ, Kinney TB et al (2005) Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Reporting standards for inferior vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up: supplement for temporary and retrievable/optional filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(4):441–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Participants in the Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference (2003) Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S427–S432. Available at: Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grassi CJ, Swan TL, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S271–S275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zanchetta M, Rigatelli G, Pedon L, Zennaro M, Maiolino P (2001) Images in cardiovascular medicine. A new permanent and retrievable vena cava filter: its removal after five months. Ital Heart J 2(9):715–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montanari S (2001) The ALN permanent/removable vena cava filter. Presented at the 5th Annual Congress Italian College of Phlebology, Rome, 12/13 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caronno R, Piffaretti G, Tozzi M et al (2006) Mid-term experience with the ALN retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 5(Suppl 1):V08–6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A, Siragusa S, Silingardi M, Ageno W (2005) Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost 3(7):1370–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mismetti P, Rivron-Guillot K, Quenet S et al (2007) A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 131(1):223–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kachura JR (2005) Inferior vena cava filter removal after 475 days implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(8):1156–1158 [Letter to the Editor]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliva VL, Szatmari F, Giroux MF, Flemming BK, Cohen SA, Soulez G (2005) The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(11):1423–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berczi V, Bottomley JR, Thomas SM, Taneja S, Gaines PA, Cleveland TJ (2007) Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices? CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(5):820–827 [Review]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Binkert CA, Sasadeusz K, Stavropoulos SW (2006) Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(2; Pt 1):299–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalva SP, Athanasoulis CA, Fan CM et al (2006) “Recovery” vena cava filter: experience in 96 patients. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29(4):559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Looby S, Given MF, Geoghegan T, McErlean A, Lee MJ (2007) Gunther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(1):59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saeed I, Garcia M, McNicholas K (2006) Right ventricular migration of a recovery IVC filter’s fractured wire with subsequent pericardial tamponade. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29(4):685–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pieri S, Agresti M, Morucci M, De Medici L (2003) Optional vena cava filters: preliminary experience with a new vena cava filter. Radiol Med 105:56–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ponchon M (1999) Temporary vena cava filtration. Preliminary experience with removable vena cava filters. Acta Clin Belg 54:223–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD et al (2001) Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(9):1053–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Offner PJ, Hawkes A, Madayag R, Scale F, Maines C (2003) The role of temporary inferior vena cava filters in critically ill surgical patients. Arch Surg 138:591–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shimizu M, Tatsumi K, Matsukawa R, Shima T, Miwa Y (2005) Retrievable Gunther Tulip filter complicated by sepsis and retroperitoneal hemorrhage: successful management by filter retrieval. Intern Med 44(6):593–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamagami T, Kato T, Hirota T, Yoshimatsu R, Matsumoto T, Nishimura T (2007) Evaluation of retrievability of the Gunther tulip vena cava filter. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(2):226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar BC, Chakraverty S, Zealley I (2006) Removal of a permanent IVC filter. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29(1):124–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asch MR (2002) Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 225:835–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(9):1189–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oliva VL (2006) Retrievability of the new recovery G2 inferior vena cava filter. Presented at the 31st annual scientific meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology, Toronto, MarchGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barral F, Tardy B, Guillot K, Laporte S, Decousus H, Mismetti P (2003) Clinical experience with optional cava filters. J Thromb Haemost 1 (Suppl 1):abstr OC441Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pancione L, Mecozzi B (2004) Permanent/removable vena cava filter ALN (France): our experience with 96 patients. Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, November 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Pellerin
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. G. Barral
    • 3
  • C. Lions
    • 4
  • L. Novelli
    • 2
  • J. P. Beregi
    • 4
  • M. Sapoval
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiovascular Radiology DepartmentGeorges Pompidou European Hospital, Université Paris 5 René DescartesParis Cedex 15France
  2. 2.Service de Radiologie Cardio-VasculaireHôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris 5 René DescartesParisFrance
  3. 3.Service de NeuroradiologieCHU BellevueSaint EtienneFrance
  4. 4.Service de Radiologie Cardio-VasculaireCHU LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations