CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1039–1045 | Cite as

The Potential Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Vulnerable Carotid Atheromatous Plaques: A Pilot Study

  • Vikramaditya Prabhudesai
  • Cordelia Phelan
  • Ying Yang
  • Ruikang K. Wang
  • Mark G. Cowling



The decision to intervene surgically in patients with carotid artery disease is based on the presence of symptoms, along with the severity of carotid artery stenosis as assessed by ultrasound or X-ray computed tomography (CT). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a relatively new imaging technique that offers potential in the identification of, as well as the distinction between, stable and unstable atherosclerotic plaques. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether OCT can be used as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to reveal the morphology of carotid stenosis from the adventitial surface of the carotid artery. To achieve this aim, excised atheromatous plaques were scanned by OCT from the external surface.


Plaques removed at carotid endarterectomy were scanned by OCT from the external surface within 72 hr of surgery and then examined histologically. The images of the histologic slides and the scans were then compared.


We examined 10 carotid endarterectomy specimens and were able to identify calcification, cholesterol crystal clefts, and lipid deposits in the OCT images with histologic correlation. The strong light scattering from the calcified tissue and cholesterol crystal clefts limited the depth of light penetration, making observation of the intimal surface and the detail of the fibrous cap difficult. However, we were able to confidently identify the absence of an atherosclerotic plaque by OCT scans even from the external surface.


The results of this pilot study demonstrate that OCT can reveal the main features of carotid stenosis but that plaque vulnerability cannot be reliably and precisely assessed if scanned from the external surface with OCT in its present form.


Carotid artery stenosis Endarterectomy Noninvasive diagnosis Optical coherence tomography 


  1. 1.
    Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, et al. (2000) Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 102:959–964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, et al. (1996) Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 23:755–765; discussion 765–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, et al. (2002) Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 106:1640–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coombs BD, Rapp JH, Ursell PC, et al. (2001) Structure of plaque at carotid bifurcation: High-resolution MRI with histologic correlation. Stroke 32:2516–2521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators (1991) Clinical alert: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Stroke and Trauma Division. Stroke 22:816–817Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, et al. (1995) Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 91:566–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP (2003) Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 34:514–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casscells W, Naghavi M, Willerson JT (2003) Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: A multifocal disease. Circulation 107:2072–2075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang YJ, Golby AJ, Albers GW (1995) Detection of carotid stenosis: From NASCET results to clinical practice. Stroke 26:1325–1328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhatia V, Bhatia R, Dhindsa S, et al. (2003) Imaging of the vulnerable plaque: New modalities. South Med J 96:1142–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacNeill BD, Lowe HC, Takano M, et al. (2003) Intravascular modalities for detection of vulnerable plaque: current status. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:1333–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nemirovsky D (2003) Imaging of high-risk plaque. Cardiology 100:160–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fayad ZA, Fuster V (2001) Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res 89:305–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eliasziw M, Rankin RN, Fox AJ, et al. (1995) Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 26:1747–1752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grønholdt ML, Nodestgaard BG, Schroeder TV, et al. (2001) Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes. Circulation 104:68–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foster FS, Knapik DA, Machado JC, Ryan LK, Nissen SE (1997) High-frequency intracoronary ultrasound imaging. Semin Interv Cardiol 2:33–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pitris C, Brezinski ME, Bouma BE, et al. (1998) High resolution imaging of the upper respiratory tract with optical coherence tomography. A feasibility study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:1640–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fujimoto JG, Boppart SA, Tearney GJ, et al. (1999) High resolution in vivo intra-arterial imaging with optical coherence tomography. Heart 82:128–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tearney GJ, Jang IK, Kang DH, et al. (2000) Porcine coronary imaging in vivo by optical coherence tomography. Acta Cardiol 55:233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang IK, Bouma BE, Kang DH, et al. (2002) Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:604–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grube E, Gerckens U, Buellesfeld L, et al. (2002) Images in cardiovascular medicine. Intracoronary imaging with optical coherence tomography: A new high-resolution technology providing striking visualization in the coronary artery. Circulation 106:2409–2410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang Y, Whiteman S, van Gey Pittius D, He Y, Wang RK, Spiteri MA (2004) Use of optical coherence tomography in delineating airways microstructure: Comparison of OCT images to histopathological sections. Phys Med Biol 49:1247–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang RK, Elder JB (2002) Propylene glycol as a contrasting medium for optical coherence tomography to image gastrointestinal tissues. Lasers Surg Med 30: 201–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang RK, Tuchin VV, Xu X, Elder JB (2001) Concurrent Enhancement of imaging depth and contrast for optical coherence tomography by hyperosmotic agents. J Opt Soc Am B 18:948–953Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    van der Meer FJ, Faber DJ, Baraznji Sassoon DM, Aalders MC, Pasterkamp G, van Leeuwen TG (2005) Localized measurement of optical attenuation coefficients of atherosclerotic plaque constituents by quantitative optical coherence tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24: 1369–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van der Meer FJ, Faber DJ, Perrée J, Pasterkamp G, Baraznji Sassoon DM, van Leeuwen TG (2005) Quantitative optical coherence tomography of arterial wall components. Lasers Med Sci 20:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levitz D, Thrane L, Frosz MH, Andersen PE, Andersen CB, Valanciunaite J, Swartling J, Andersson-Engels S, Hansen PR (2004) Determination of optical scattering properties of highly-scattering media in optical coherence tomography images. Opt Express 12:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fujimoto JG, Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, Boppart SA, Bouma BE, Hee MR, Southern JF, Swanson EA (1995) Optical biopsy and imaging using optical coherence tomography. Nature Med 1:970–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Divetia A, Hsieh TH, Zhang J, Chen ZP, Bachman M, Li GP (2005) Dynamically focused optical coherence tomography for endoscopic applications. Appl Phys Lett 86, 103902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Drexler W, Morgner U, Kartner FX, Pitris C, Boppart SA, Li XD, Ippen EP, Fujimoto JG (1999) In vivo ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 24:1221–1223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vikramaditya Prabhudesai
    • 1
  • Cordelia Phelan
    • 2
  • Ying Yang
    • 3
  • Ruikang K. Wang
    • 4
  • Mark G. Cowling
    • 5
  1. 1.Diagnostic ImagingSt. Joseph’s HospitalHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital of North Staffordshire, NHS TrustStoke-on-TrentUK
  3. 3.Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringOregon Health & Science UniversityBeavertonUSA
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital of North Staffordshire, NHS TrustStoke-on-TrentUK

Personalised recommendations