Thermoablation of Liver Metastases: Efficacy of Temporary Celiac Plexus Block

  • A.N. Beck
  • M. Schäfer
  • M. Werk
  • M. Pech
  • G. Wieners
  • C. Cho
  • J. Ricke
Clinical Investigation



To determine the efficacy of celiac plexus block during thermoablation of liver metastases.


Fifty-five consecutive patients underwent thermoablation therapy of liver tumors by laser-induced thermotherapy. Twenty-nine patients received a temporary celiac plexus block, 26 patients acted as control group. In both groups fentanyl and midazolam were administered intravenously upon request of the patient. The duration of the intervention, consumption of opiates, and individual pain sensations were documented.


No complications resulting from the celiac plexus block were recorded. Celiac plexus block significantly reduced the amount of pain medication used during thermoablation therapy of liver tumors (with block, 2.45 μg fentanyl per kg body weight; without block, 3.58 μg fentanyl per kg body weight, p < 0.05; midazolam consumption was not reduced) in patients with metastases ≤5 mm from the liver capsule. For metastases farther away from the capsule no significant differences in opiate consumption were seen. Celiac plexus block reduced the time for thermoablation significantly (178 min versus 147 min, p < 0.05) no matter how far the metastases were from the liver capsule. Average time needed to set the block was 12 min (range 9–15 min); additional costs for the block were marginal. As expected (as pain medications were given according to individual patients’ needs) pain indices did not differ significantly between the two groups.


In patients with liver metastases ≤5 mm from the liver capsule, celiac plexus block reduces the amount of opiates necessary, simplifying patient monitoring. In addition celiac plexus block reduces intervention time, with positive effects on overall workflow for all patients.


Celiac plexus block Liver Metastases Thermoablation 


  1. 1.
    Eisenberg, E, Carr, DB, Chalmers, TC 1995Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: A meta-analysisAnesth Analg80290295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Firdousi, FH, Sharma, D, Raina, VK 2002Palliation by coeliac plexus block for upper abdominal visceral cancer painTrop Doct32224226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kawamata, M, Ishitani, K, Ishikawa, K,  et al. 1996Comparison between celiac plexus block and morphine treatment on quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer painPain64597602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whiteman, MS, Rosenberg, H, Haskin, PH,  et al. 1986Celiac plexus block for interventional radiologyRadiology161836838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dick, EA, Taylor-Robinson, SD, Thomas, HC,  et al. 2003Ablative therapy for liver tumoursGut50733739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vogl, TJ, Straub, R, Eichler, K,  et al. 2002Malignant liver tumors treated with MR imaging-guided laser-induced thermotherapy. Experience with complications in 899 patients (2520 lesions)Radiology225367377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman, M, Mikityanski, I, Kam, A,  et al. 2004Radiofrequency ablation of cancerCardiovasc Intervent Radiol27427434CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varro, Z, Locklin, JK, Wood, BJ 2004Laser navigation for radiofrequency ablationCardiovasc Intervent Radiol27512515CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banos, JE, Bosch, F, Canellas, M,  et al. 1989Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: A comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative painMethods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol11123127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breivik, EK, Bjornsson, GA, Skovlund, E 2000A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial dataClin J Pain162228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conno, F, Caraceni, A, Gamba, A,  et al. 1994Pain measurement in cancer patients: A comparison of six methodsPain57161166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, S, Tandon, OP, Mathur, R 2002Pain measurement: A formidable taskIndian J Physiol Pharmacol46396406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosier, EM, Iadarola, MJ, Coghill, RC 2002Reproducibility of pain measurement and pain perceptionPain98205216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perello, A, Ashford, NS, Dolin, SJ 1999Coeliac plexus block using computed tomography guidancePalliat Med13419425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Titton, RL, Lucey, BC, Gervais, DA,  et al. 2002Celiac plexus block: A palliative tool underused by radiologistsAJR Am J Roentgenol179633636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boker, A, Brownell, L, Donen, N 2002Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale provides a simple and reliable measure of preoperative anxietyCan J Anaesth49792798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davies, DD 1993Incidence of major complications of neurolytic coeliac plexus blockJ R Soc Med86264266PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, A, Tripathi, SS, Dhar, D,  et al. 2001A case of reversible paraparesis following celiac plexus blockReg Anesth Pain Med267578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fujita, Y 1988Splanchnic circulation following coeliac plexus blockActa Anaesthesiol Scand32323327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kapoor, BS, Hunter, DW 2003Injection of subphrenic saline during radiofrequency ablation to minimize diaphragmatic injuryCardiovasc Intervent Radiol26302304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pech, M, Werk, M, Beck, A,  et al. 2002System continuity and energy distribution in laser-induced thermo therapy (LITT)Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr174754760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.N. Beck
    • 1
  • M. Schäfer
    • 1
  • M. Werk
    • 1
  • M. Pech
    • 1
  • G. Wieners
    • 1
  • C. Cho
    • 1
  • J. Ricke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversitäts Medicin Berlin, Charité, Campus-Virchow-KlinikumBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations