CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 265–268

Influence of Thrombus Age on the Mechanical Thrombectomy Efficacy of the Amplatz Thrombectomy Device In Vitro

  • Jan Grimm
  • Thomas Jahnke
  • Claus Muhle
  • Martin Heller
  • Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck
Laboratory Investigations


Purpose: To determine the efficacy of thrombectomy for the Amplatz Thrombectomy Device (ATD) according to the age of the thrombus. Methods: Thrombectomy was performed with the 7 Fr or 8 Fr ATD. Five-day-old or 8-day-old thrombi were made from porcine blood by clotting within silicone tubes to be used in a flow model. Emboli sizes, weight, remaining thrombus and activation time were evaluated. Results: The age of the thrombus had no influence on the activation time necessary for complete thrombolysis. A significant difference was found in the overall amount of embolization only with the 7 Fr device although a similar trend was shown with the 8 Fr device. The amount of embolized thrombotic material was higher for both devices if older thrombi (i.e., 8 days old) were processed. The overall impression was that the 8 Fr device showed slightly better results (less remaining thrombus and embolization). Conclusion: A tendency toward higher amounts of embolization was observed if older thrombi were used in the model. Therefore the interventional radiologist should be aware of the potentially higher risk of peripheral embolization when performing mechanical thrombectomy (with the ATD) in older thrombotic occlusions, especially since the higher rate of embolization was mainly due to an increased proportion of larger embolic particles (1 mm), which are clinically more significant.


Mechanical thrombectomy Thrombus age Interventional radiology In vitro experiment 


  1. 1.
    Bildsoe, MC, Moradian, GP, Hunter, DW, Castaneda-Zuniga, WR,  et al. 1989Mechanical clot dissolution: New concept.Radiology171231233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmitz-Rode, T, Günther, RW 1991Percutaneous mechanical thrombolysis: A comparative study of various rotational catheter systems.Invest Radiol2655763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yasui, K, Quian, Z, Nazarian, GK, Hunter, DW, Castaneda-Zungia, WR, Amplatz, K 1993Recirculation-type Amplatz clot macerator: Determination of particle size and distribution.J Vasc Interv Radiol4275278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Kalinowski, M, Heller, M, Wagner, HJ 2000Rheolytic hydrodynamic thrombectomy for percutaneous treatment of acutely occluded infra-aortic native arteries and bypass grafts: Midterm follow-up results.Invest Radiol35131140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Grimm, J, Leidt, J, Jahnke, T, Heller, M 2001Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices.J Vasc Interv Radiol1211851191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimm, J, Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Heller, M 2001Comparison of the mechanical thrombectomy efficacy of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and the Cragg thrombolytic brush in vitro.Invest Radiol36204209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zana, K, Otal, P, Fornet, B, Forrai, G, Chabbert, V, Smayra, T, Joffre, F, Rousseau, H 2001In vitro evaluation of a new rotational thrombectomy device: The Straub Rotarex catheter.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol24319323Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Bathe, M, Grimm, J, Heller, M 1999Enhancement of in vitro effectiveness for hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices: Simultaneous high-pressure rt-PA application.Invest Radiol34536542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Grimm, J, Suwelack, D, Heller, M 1999Mechanical assistance for enhancement of in vitro effectiveness for hydrodynamic thrombectomy.Invest Radiol34669677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tadavarthy, SM, Murray, PD, Inampudi, S, Nazarian, GK, Amplatz, K 1994Mechanical thrombectomy with the Amplatz device: Human experience.J Vasc Interv Radiol5715724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rillinger, N, Görich, J, Scharrer-Palmer, R, Vogel, J, Tomczak, R, Krämer, S, Merkle, E, Brambs, H, Sokiranski, R 1997Short term results with the use of the Amplatz Thrombectomy Device in the treatment of acute lower limb occlusions.J Vasc Interv Radiol8343348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uflacker, R, Rajagopalan, PR, Vujic, I, Stutley, JE 1996Treatment of thrombosed dialysis access grafts: Randomized trial of surgical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy with the Amplatz device.J Vasc Interv Radiol7185192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Höpfner, M, Hilbert, C, Kramer-Hansen, H, Heller, M 2000Mechanical thrombectomy of acute thrombosis in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.Invest Radiol35385391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Brossmann, J, Jahnke, T, Grimm, J, Reuter, M, Bewig, B, Heller, M 2001Mechanical thrombectomy of major and massive pulmonary embolism with use of the Amplatz thrombectomy device.Invest Radiol36317322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liepsch, DW 1986Flow in tubes and arteries: A comparison.Biorheology23395433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delomez, M, Beregi, JP, Willoteaux, S, Bauchart, JJ, d’Othee, BJ, Asseman, P, Perez, N, Thery, C 2001Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with deep venous thrombosis.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol244248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uflacker, R 1997Mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute thrombosis with use of the Amplatz device: Arterial and venous applications.J Vasc Interv Radiol8923932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman, CC, Krenzel, C, Dietz, CA, Nazarian, GK, Amplatz, K 1993Mechanical thrombectomy: Results of early experience.Radiology189803805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quian, Z, Kim, JK, Postoack, DW, Xu, H, Hamide, JP, Cataneda, WR 1998The 6 French Amplatz Thrombectomy Device (abst.).J Vasc Interv Radiol9189Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Müller-Hülsbeck, S, Grimm, J, Leidt, J, Heller, M 2002In vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices for large vessel diameter and low-pressure fluid dynamic applications.J Vasc Interv Radiol13831839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wildberger, JE, Schmitz-Rode, T, Schubert, H, Gunther, RW 2000Percutaneous venous thrombectomy with the use of a balloon sheath: First in vitro investigations of a new low-tech concept.Invest Radiol35352358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trerotola, SO, McLennan, G, Davidson, D, Lane, KA, Ambrosius, WT, Lazzaro, C, Dreesen, J 2001Preclinical in vivo testing of the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device for venous thrombosis.J Vasc Interv Radiol1295103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haage, P, Tacke, J, Bovelander, J, Wildberger, JE, Klosterhalfen, B, Vorwerk, D, Gunther, RW 2001Prototype percutaneous thrombolytic device: Preclinical testing in subacute inferior vena caval thrombosis in a pig model.Radiology220135141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pechlaner, C, Buratti, T, Wiedermann, C 1997Diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Outcome depends on size of embolus.BMJ3141551Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Grimm
    • 1
  • Thomas Jahnke
    • 1
  • Claus Muhle
    • 1
  • Martin Heller
    • 1
  • Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für Diagnostische RadiologieChristian Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, A. Heller Strasse 9, 24105 KielGermany

Personalised recommendations