Advertisement

Interventions in Infrainguinal Bypass Grafts

  • S. Müller-HülsbeckEmail author
  • B.-M. Order
  • T. Jahnke
REVIEW ARTICLE

Abstract

The interventional radiologist plays an important role in the detection and prevention of infrainguinal bypass failure. Early detection and evaluation of flow-limiting lesions effectively preserve graft (venous bypass and polyester or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass) patency by identifying stenoses before occlusion occurs. Delay in treatment of the at-risk graft may result in graft failure and a reduced chance of successful revascularization. For this reason, surveillance protocols form an important part of follow-up after infrainguinal bypass surgery. As well as having an understanding of the application of imaging techniques including ultrasound, MR angiography, CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography, the interventional radiologist should have detailed knowledge of the minimally invasive therapeutic options. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), or alternatively cutting balloon angioplasty, is the interventional treatment of choice in prevention of graft failure and occlusion. Further alternatives include metallic stent placement, fibrinolysis, and mechanical thrombectomy. Primary assisted patency rates following PTA can be up to 65% at 5 years. When the endovascular approach is unsuccessful, these therapeutic options are complemented by surgical procedures including vein patch revision, jump grafting, or placement of a new graft.

Keywords

Graft failure Infrainguinal bypass grafts Occlusion PTA Stenosis 

References

  1. 1.
    TASC Consensus document (2000) TASC: Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). J Vasc Surg 31 [Suppl]:S1–S296Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Panayiotopoulos YP, Edmondson RA, Reidy JF, Taylor PR (1998) A scoring system to predict the outcome of long femorodistal arterial bypass grafts to single calf or pedal vessels. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15:380–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawson I, van Bockel JH (1999) Reintervention and mortality after infrainguinal reconstructive surgery for leg ischemia. Br J Surg 86:38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karacagil S, Holmberg A, Narbani A, Eriksson I, Bergqvist D (1996) Composite polytetrafluoroethylene/vein bypass grafts: Conventional distal vein segment or cuff? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12:337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al (1986) Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Archie JP Jr (1994) Femoropopliteal bypass with either adequate ipsilateral reversed saphenous vein or obligatory polytetrafluoroethylene. Ann Vasc Surg 8:475–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen BT, Reilly JM, Rubin BG, Thompson RW, Anderson CB, Flye MW, Sicard GA (1996) Femoropopliteal bypass for claudication: Veins vs. PTFE. Ann Vasc Surg 10:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Prego AA, Ucelay-Gomez R, Freischlag JA, Ahn SS, Baker JD, Machleder HI, Moore WS (1992) Long-term results of infrainguinal revascularization with polytetrafluoroethylene: A ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg 16:209–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faries PL, Lo Gerfo FW, Arora S, Hook S, Pulling MC, Akbari CM, Campbell DR, Pomposelli FB (2000) A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduits versus prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg 32:1080–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burger DHC, Kappetein HP, Hajo van Bockel J, Breslau PJ (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing vein with polytetrafluoroethylene in above -knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 32:278–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Schmitt DD (1991) Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: Determinant factors of long-term patency. J Vasc Surg 13:137–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pomposelli FB, Marcaccio EJ, Gibbons GW, Campbell DR, Freeman DV, Burgess AM, Miller A, LoGerfo FW (1995) Dorsalis pedis arterial bypass: Durable limb salvage for foot ischemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 21:375–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belkin M, Knox J, Donaldson MC, Mannick JA, Whittemore AD (1996) Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with nonreversed greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 24:957–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gentile AT, Lee RW, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM (1996) Results of bypass to the popliteal and tibial arteries with alternative sources of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg 23:272–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chang BB, Paty PSK, Sha DM, Leather RP (1992) The lesser saphenous vein: An appreciated source of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg 15:152–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belkin M, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD (1995) Composite autogenous vein grafts. Semin Vasc Surg 8:202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM (1990) Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modern series. J Vasc Surg 11:193–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fogle MA, Whittemore AD, Couch NP, Mannick JR (1987) A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 5:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kent KC, Donaldson MC, Atttinger CE, Couch NP, Mannick JR, Whittemore AD (1988) Femoropopliteal reconstruction for claudication: The risk to life and limb. Arch Surg 123:1196–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loh A, Chester JF, Taylor RS (1993) PTFE bypass grafting to isolated popliteal segments in critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Surg 7:26–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, Cox M, Chester JF (1992) Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: Long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg 79:348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Collaborative overview of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy. II. Maintenance of vascular graft or arterial patency by antiplatelet therapy. Antiplatelet Trialist Collaboration. Br Med J 308:159–168Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Becquemin JP, (1997) Effects of ticlopidine on the long term patency of saphenous vein bypass grafts in the legs: Etude de la ticlopidine après pontage femoro-poplite and the Assoc. Universtaire de Recherche en Chirurgie. N Engl J Med 337:1726–1731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    CAPRIE Steering committee (1996) A randomised, blinded trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 348:1329–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kretschmer G, Herbst F, Prager M, Sautner T, Wenzi E, Berlakovich GA, et al (1992) A decade of oral anticoagulant treatment to maintain autologous vein grafts for femoropopliteal atherosclerosis. Arch Surg 127:1112–1115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kretschmer G, Wenzl E, Piza F, Polterauer P, Ehringer H, Minar E, et al (1987) The influence of anticoagulant treatment on the probability of function in femoropopliteal vein bypass surgery: Analysis of a clinical series (1970–1985) and interim evaluation of a controlled clinical trial. Surgery 102:453–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arfvidsson B, Lundgren F, Drott C, Scherstein T, Lundholm K (1990) Influence of coumarin treatment on patency and limb salvage after peripheral arterial reconstructive surgery. Am J Surg 159:556–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Szilagyi DE, Elliot JP, Hagemann JH, Smith RF, Dallomo CA (1973) Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes: Clinical, angiographic, and histopathologic observations in femoropopliteal operations for atherosclerosis. Ann Surg 178:232–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stept LL, Flinn WR, McCarthy WJ, Bartlett ST, Bergan JJ, Yao JST (1987) Technical defects as a cause of early graft failure after femorodistal bypass. Arch Surg 122:599–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanchez LA, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Goldsmith J, Lyon RT, Wengerter KR, Panetta TF, Marin ML, Cynamon J, Berdejo G, Sprayregen S, Bakal CW (1991) A ten-year experience with one hundred fifty failing or threatened vein and polytetrafluoroethylene arterial bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 14:729–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erickson CA, Towne JB, Seabrook GR (1996) Ongoing vascular laboratory surveillance is essential to maximize long-term in situ saphenous vein bypass patency. J Vasc Surg 23:18–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Avino AJ, Bandyk DF, Gonsalves AJ, Johnson BL, Black TJ, Zwiebel BR, Rahaim MJ, Cantor A (1999) Surgical and endovascular intervention for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg 29:60–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Righini M, Quere I, Janbon C, Laroche JP (2003) Clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up after femoro-popliteal vein bypass for lower limb revascularisation. J Mal Vasc 28:121–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lundell A, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, Hansen F (1995) Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: A prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 21:26–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grigg MJ, Nicolaides AN, Wolfe JHN (1988) Femorodistal vein bypass graft stenoses. Br J Surg 75:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bandyk DF, Johnson BL, Gupta AK, Esses GE (1996) Nature and management of duplex abnormalities encountered during infrainguinal vein bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 24:430–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beidle TR, Brom-Ferral R, Letourneau JG (1994) Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Idu MM, Buth J, Cuypers P, Hop WC, van de Pavoordt ED Tordoir JM (1998) Economising vein graft surveillance programs. J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spijkerboer AM, Beek FJ, Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP (1997) The predictive value of angiographic results for the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in stenosed femoral bypass grafts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:98–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hoksbergen AW, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Ubbink DT, Jacobs MJ (1999) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of peripheral bypass stenoses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:282–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Berkowitz HD, Fox AD, Deaton DH (1992) Reversed vein graft stenosis: Early diagnosis and management. J Vasc Surg 15:130–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turnipseed WD, Sproat IA (1992) A preliminary experience with use of magnetic resonance angiography in assessment of failing lower extremity bypass grafts. Surgery 112:664–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jahnke T, Brossmann J, Walluscheck K, Heller M, Müller-Hülsbeck S (2003) A rapid-exchange monorail stent system for salvage of failing femoropopliteal bypass grafts. J Endovasc Ther 10:798–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taylor RS, McFarland RJ, Cox MI (1987) An investigation into the causes of failure of PTFE grafts. Eur J Vasc Surg 1:335–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor RS (1991) Prosthetic bypasses: Can we improve the results? J Mal Vasc 16:18–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Golledge J, Beattie DK, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH (1996) Have the results of infrainguinal bypass improved with the widespread utilisation of postoperative surveillance? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11:388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tonnesen KH, Holstein P, Rordam L, Bulow J, Helgstrand U, Dreyer M (1998) Early results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of failing below-knee bypass grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15:515–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Houghton AD, Todd C, Pardy B, Taylor PR, Reidy JF (1997) Percutaneous angioplasty for infrainguinal graft-related stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14:380–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lofberg AM, Karacagil S, Ljungmann C, Nyman R, Tulga Ulus A, Bostrom A, Ostholm G (2002) Distal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty through infrainguinal bypass grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 23:212–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Perler BA, Osterman FA, Mitchell SE, Burdick JF, Williams GM (1990) Balloon dilatation versus surgical revision of infra-inguinal autogenous vein graft stenoses: Long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg 31:656–661Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    London NJ, Sayers RD, Thompson MM, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, Ratliff DA, Bell PR, Bolia A (1993) Interventional radiology in the maintenance of infrainguinal vein graft patency. Br J Surg 80:187–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Goh RH, Sniderman KW, Kalman PG (2000) Long-term follow-up of management of failing in situ saphenous vein bypass grafts using endovascular intervention techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:705–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, Mannick JA (1993) Further experience with an all-autogenous tissue policy for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 18:41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Whittemore AD, Donaldson MC, Polak JF, Mannik JA (1991) Limitations of balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg 14:340–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fattori R, Piva T (2003) Drug-eluting stents in vascular intervention. Lancet 361:247–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Duda SH, Poerner TC, Wiesinger B, Rundback JH, Tepe G, Wiskirchen J, Haase KK (2003) Drug-eluting stents: Potential applications for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:291–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Machan L (2004) Drug eluting stents in the infrainguinal circulation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 7:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hanekamp C, Koolen J, Bonnier H, Oldroyd K, de Boer MJ, Heublein B, Visser C, Small Vessel Study Group (2004) Randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus silicon carbon-coated stent implantation for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 93:1233–1237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vinnicombe SJ, Heenan SD, Belli AM, Buckenham TM (1994) Directional atherectomy in the treatment of anastomotic neointimal hyperplasia associated with prosthetic arterial grafts: Technique and preliminary results. Clin Radiol 49:773–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dolmatch BL, Gray RJ, Horton KM, Rundback JH, Kline ME (1995) Treatment of anastomotic bypass graft stenosis with directional atherectomy: Short-term and intermediate-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Barath P (1996) Microsurgical dilatation concept: Animal data. J Invasive Cardiol 8 [Suppl A]:2A–5APubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Engelke C, Morgan AM, Belli AM (2002) Cutting balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for salvage of lower limb arterial bypass grafts: Feasibility. Radiology 223:106–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kasirajan K, Schneider PA (2004) Early outcome of “cutting” balloon angioplasty for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg 39:702–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Porter DH, Rosen MP, Skillman JJ, Sheiman RG, Kent KC, Kim D (1996) Mid-term and long-term results with directional atherectomy of vein graft stenoses. J Vasc Surg 23:554–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bertrand OF, Mongrain R, Soualmi L, et al (1998) Development of coronary aneurysm after cutting balloon angioplasty: Assessment by intracoronary ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 44:449–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ergene O, Seyithanoglu BY, Tastan A, et al (1998) Comparison of angiographic and clinical outcome after cutting balloon and conventional balloon angioplasty in vessels smaller than 3 mm in diameter: A randomized trial. J Invas Cardiol 10:70–75Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Marti V, Martin V, Garcia J, Guiteras P, Auge JM (1998) Significance of angiographic coronary dissection after cutting balloon angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 81:1349–1352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Braithwaite BD, Jones L, Yusuf SW, Dawson K, Berridge DC, Davies E, Bowyer R, Treska V, Earnshaw JJ (1995) Aspirin improves the outcome of intra-arterial thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. Thrombolysis Study Group. Br J Surg 82:1357–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Conrad MF, Shepard AD, Rubinfeld IS, Burke MW, Nypaver TJ, Reddy DJ, Cho JS (2003) Long-term result of catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat infrainguinal bypass graft occlusion: The urokinase era. J Vasc Surg 37:1009–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zuckermann DA, Alderman MG, Idso MC, Pilgram TK, Sicard GA (2003) Follow-up of infrainguinal thrombolysis: Analysis of predictors of clinical success. Arch Surg 138:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Berkowitz HD, Kee JC (1995) Occluded infrainguinal grafts: When to choose lytic therapy versus a new bypass graft. Am J Surg 170:136–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Van Damme H, Trotteur G, Dondelinger RF, Limet R (1997) Thrombolysis of occluded infrainguinal bypass grafts. Acta Chir Belg 97:177–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Schwarzenberg H (1998) Lokale Fibrinolyse peripherer arterieller Gefässverschlüsse. Fortschr Rontgenstr 169:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Comerota AJ, Weaver FA, Hosking JD, Froehlich J, Folander H, Sussman B, Rosenfield K (1996) Results of a prospective, randomized trial of surgery versus thrombolysis for occluded lower extremity bypass grafts. Am J Surg 172:105–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Belkin M, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, Polak JF, Grassi CJ, Harrington DP, Mannick JA (1990) Observations on the use of thrombolytic agents for thrombotic occlusion of infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 11:289–294; discussion 295–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Spence LD, Hartnell GG, Reinking G, McEniff N, Gibbons G, Pomposelli F, Clouse ME (1997) Thrombolysis of infrapopliteal bypass grafts: Efficacy and underlying angiographic pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:717–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hye RJ, Turner C, Valji K, Wolf YG, Roberts AC, Bookstein JJ, Plecha EJ (1994) Is thrombolysis of occluded popliteal and tibial bypass grafts worthwhile? J Vasc Surg 20:588–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA (1998) A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusions of the legs. N Engl J Med 338:1105–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Nackman GB, Walsh DB, Fillinger MF, Zwolak RM, Bech FR, Bettmann MA, Cronenwett JL (1997) Thrombolysis of occluded infrainguinal vein grafts: Predictors of outcome. J Vasc Surg 25:1023–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sullivan KL, Gardiner Jr GA, Kandarpa K, Bonn J, Shapiro MJ, Carabasi RA, Smullens S, Levin DC (1991) Efficacy of thrombolysis in infrainguinal bypass grafts. Circulation 83 [Suppl 1]:I-99–I-105Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    De Frang RD, Edwards JM, Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Porter JM (1994) Repeat leg bypass after multiple prior bypass failures. J Vasc Surg 19:268–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Müller-Hülsbeck S, Kalinowski M, Heller M, Wagner HJ (2000) Rheolytic hydrodynamic thrombectomy for percutaneous treatment of acutely occluded infra-aortic native arteries and bypass grafts: Midterm follow-up results. Invest Radiol 35:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rillinger N, Görich J, Scharrer Palmer, Vogel J, Tomaczak R, Kramer S, Merkle E, Brambs HJ, Sokiranski R (1997) Short-term results with use of the Amplatz thrombectomy device in the treatment of acute lower limb occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rousseau H, Sapoval M, Ballini P, Dube M, Joffre F, Gaux JC, Cercueil JP, Krause D, Moulin G, Bartoli JM (1997) Percutaneous recanalization of acutely thrombosed vessels by hydrodynamic thrombectomy (Hydrolyser). Eur Radiol 7:935–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Alexander JQ, Katz SG (2003) The efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis. Arch Surg 138:510–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Darling RC 3rd, Roddy SP, Chang BB, Paty PS, Kreienberg PB, Maharaj D, Shah DM (2002) Long-term results of revised infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 35:773–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein — Campus KielGermany

Personalised recommendations