Advertisement

Physics and Chemistry of Minerals

, Volume 42, Issue 10, pp 847–859 | Cite as

Structural iron in dioctahedral and trioctahedral smectites: a polarized XAS study

  • N. FinckEmail author
  • M. L. Schlegel
  • A. Bauer
Original Paper

Abstract

The chemical form of structural Fe in smectites influences many physicochemical properties of these clay minerals. Powder EXAFS data for structural Fe in smectites have been reported; however, the preferred orientation of clay platelets with respect to the X-ray beam may lead to erroneous conclusions on the local chemical environment. Dioctahedral montmorillonite and for the first time trioctahedral hectorite were prepared as textured samples, and the Fe local environment was probed by analysis of the X-ray absorption pre-edge peaks at the magic angle and by polarized EXAFS (P-EXAFS) spectroscopy. Compared to powder measurements, overlapping contributions from shells with distinct orientations can be filtered more easily by P-EXAFS, thus decreasing uncertainties on structural parameters. The pre-edge spectrum of montmorillonite is similar to spectra commonly reported for dioctahedral smectites. In contrast, the pre-edge spectrum of hectorite is notably distinct and hints to either differences in the site symmetry and/or in covalence. In both smectites, Fe is surrounded by a first O shell at a distance consistent with sixfold-coordinated Fe(III), suggesting that Fe(III) is located in the smectite octahedral sheet. This is corroborated by the distances and orientations of neighboring cationic shells, such as in-plane (Mg, Al) and out-of-plane Si shells. For montmorillonite, the results indicate Fe substitution for Al/Mg in the octahedral sheet, and a number of Fe neighbors consistent with random distribution in the octahedral sheet. For hectorite, results indicate a slight tendency for Fe atoms to form pairs in octahedral sheets; however, low numbers of neighboring cations were obtained, presumably a consequence of the presence of vacancies and/or Li in the vicinity of Fe, or of the coexistence of Fe and Mg neighbors with mutually canceling EXAFS waves. Consistent with pre-edge data, the coordination numbers can also indicate some incoherency in Fe-cation interatomic distances in hectorite as a consequence of site distortion. These results suggest that Fe3+ in hectorite locally distorts the structure of the trioctahedral phyllosilicate and tends to aggregate charge-deficient (i.e., vacant or Li+-containing) octahedral sites.

Keywords

Montmorillonite Hectorite Iron Polarized XAS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility is acknowledged for provision of synchrotron radiation beamtime. We thank O. Proux for assistance during XAS data collection at the FAME beamline.

References

  1. Ankudinov AL, Ravel B, Rehr JJ, Conradson SD (1998) Real-space multiple-scattering calculation and interpretation of X-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Phys Rev B 58(12):7565–7576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop ME, Dong H, Kukkadapu RK, Liu C, Edelmann RE (2011) Bioreduction of Fe-bearing clay minerals and their reactivity toward pertechnetate (Tc-99). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75(18):5229–5246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop ME, Glasser P, Dong H, Arey B, Kovarik L (2014) Reduction and immobilization of hexavalent chromium by microbially reduced Fe-bearing clay minerals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 133:186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breu J, Seidl W, Stoll A (2003) Fehlordnung bei Smectiten in Abhängigkeit vom Zwischenschichtkation. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 629(3):503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drits VA, Manceau A (2000) A model for the mechanism of Fe3+ to Fe2+ reduction in dioctahedral smectites. Clays Clay Miner 48(2):185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyar MD, Delaney JS, Sutton SR (2001) Fe XANES spectra of iron-rich micas. Eur J Miner 13(6):1079–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ernstsen V, Gates WP, Stucki JW (1998) Microbial reduction of structural iron in clays—a renewable source of reduction capacity. J Environ Qual 27(4):761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finck N, Schlegel ML, Bosbach D (2009) Sites of Lu(III) sorbed to and coprecipitated with hectorite. Environ Sci Technol 43(23):8807–8812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finck N, Dardenne K, Geckeis H (2015) Am(III) coprecipitation with and adsorption on the smectite hectorite. Chem Geol 409:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gates WP (2008) Cation mass-valence sum (CM-VS) approach to assigning OH-bending bands in dioctahedral smectites. Clays Clay Miner 56(1):10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gates WP, Stucki JW, Kirkpatrick RO (1996) Structural properties of reduced upton montmorillonite. Phys Chem Miner 23:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gates WP et al (1998) Swelling and texture of iron-bearing smectites reduced by bacteria. Clays Clay Miner 46(5):487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gates WP, Slade PG, Manceau A, Lanson B (2002) Site occupancies by iron in nontronites. Clays Clay Miner 50(2):223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gates WP, Bouazza A, Churchman GJ (2009) Bentonite clay keeps pollutants at bay. Elements 5:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golubev SV, Bauer A, Pokrovsky OS (2006) Effect of pH and organic ligands on the kinetics of smectite dissolution at 25 °C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(17):4436–4451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorski CA, Klüpfel LE, Voegelin A, Sander M, Hofstetter TB (2013) Redox Properties of structural Fe in clay minerals: 3. relationships between smectite redox and structural properties. Environ Sci Technol 47(23):13477–13485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Güven N (1988) Smectites. In: Bailey SW (ed) Hydrous phyllosilicates. Reviews in mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, pp 497–559Google Scholar
  18. Güven N (2009) Bentonites—clay for molecular engineering. Elements 5(2):89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hahn JE et al (1982) Observation of an electric quadrupole transition in the X-ray absorption spectrum of a Cu(II) complex. Chem Phys Lett 88(6):595–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Komadel P, Madejova J, Bujdak J (2005) Preparation and properties of reduced-charge smectites—a review. Clays Clay Miner 53(4):313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Komadel P, Madejová J, Stucki JW (2006) Structural Fe(III) reduction in smectites. Appl Clay Sci 34(1–4):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madejova J, Komadel P (2001) Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: infrared methods. Clays Clay Miner 49(5):410–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manceau A (1990) Distribution of cations among the octahedra of phyllosilicates—insights from EXAFS. Can Miner 28:321–328Google Scholar
  24. Manceau A, Gates WP (1997) Surface structural model for ferrihydrite. Clays Clay Miner 43:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manceau A, Bonnin D, Stone WEE, Sanz J (1990) Distribution of Fe in the octahedral sheet of trioctahedral micas by polarized EXAFS. Phys Chem Miner 17(4):363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manceau A, Chateigner D, Gates WP (1998) Polarized EXAFS, distance-valence least-squares modeling (DVLS) and quantitative texture analysis approaches to the structural refinement of Garfield nontronite. Phys Chem Miner 25(5):347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manceau A et al (2000a) Oxidation–reduction mechanism of iron in dioctahedral smectites: II. Crystal chemistry of reduced Garfield nontronite. Am Miner 85(1):153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manceau A et al (2000b) Oxidation–reduction mechanism of iron in dioctahedral smectites: I. Crystal chemistry of oxidized reference nontronites. Am Miner 85(1):133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mering J, Glaeser R (1954) Sur le rôle de la valence des cations échangeables dans la montmorillonite. Bulletin de la Société française de Minéralogie et Cristallographie 77:519–530Google Scholar
  30. Meunier A (2005) Clays. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  31. Munoz M et al (2013) Iron oxidation state in phyllosilicate single crystals using Fe-K pre-edge and XANES spectroscopy: effects of the linear polarization of the synchrotron X-ray beam. Am Miner 98(7):1187–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neumann A, Petit S, Hofstetter TB (2011) Evaluation of redox-active iron sites in smectites using middle and near infrared spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75(9):2336–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oberlin A, Mering J (1966) Observations sur l’hectorite (étude en microscopie et diffraction électronique). Bulletin de la Société française de Minéralogie et Cristallographie 89:29–40Google Scholar
  34. Pentráková L, Su K, Pentrák M, Stucki JW (2013) A review of microbial redox interactions with structural Fe in clay minerals. Clay Miner 48(3):543–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Proux O et al (2005) FAME: a new beamline for X-ray absorption investigation of very-diluted systems of environmental materials and biological interest. Phys Scr T115:970–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ravel B (2000) EXAFS analysis with feff and feffit. Part 2. Commentary, New york. http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/course/notes.pdf Google Scholar
  37. Ravel B, Newville M (2005) ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat 12(4):537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanz J, Stone WEE (1983) NMR applied to minerals: 4. Local order in the octahedral sheet of micas: Fe-F avoidance. Clay Miner 18(2):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlegel ML, Manceau A, Chateigner D, Charlet L (1999) Sorption of metal ions on clay minerals. I. Polarized EXAFS evidence for the adsorption of cobalt on the edges of hectorite particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 215:140–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlegel ML, Manceau A, Hazemann J-L, Charlet L (2001) Adsorption mechanisms of Zn on hectorite as a function of time, pH, and ionic strength. Am J Sci 301(9):798–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr Sect A 32(5):751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stucki JW (1988) Structural iron in smectites. In: Stucki JW, Goodman BA, Schwertmann U (eds) Iron in soils and clay minerals. NATO ASI series. Springer, New york, pp 625–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stucki JW (2006) Properties and behaviour of iron in clay minerals. In: Bergaya F, Theng BGK, Lagaly G (eds) Handbook of clay science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 429–482Google Scholar
  44. Swarnakar R, Brandt KB, Kydd RA (1996) Catalytic activity of Ti- and Al-pillared montmorillonite and beidellite for cumene cracking and hydrocracking [A3411]. Appl catal A Gen 142:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thien B et al (2010) Structural identification of a trioctahedral smectite formed by the aqueous alteration of a nuclear glass. Appl Clay Sci 49(3):135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas J, Glass HD, White WA, Trandel RM (1977) Fluoride content of clay minerals and argillaceous earth materials. Clays Clay Miner 25(4):278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsipursky SI, Drits VA (1984) The distribution of octahedral cations in the 2-1 layers of dioctahedral smectites studied by oblique-texture electron-diffraction. Clay Miner 19(2):177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vantelon D et al (2003) Iron distribution in the octahedral sheet of dioctahedral smectites. An Fe K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Phys Chem Miner 30(1):44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westre TE et al (1997) A multiplet analysis of Fe K-edge 1s- > 3d pre-edge features of iron complexes. J Am Chem Soc 119(27):6297–6314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilke M, Farges F, Petit P-E, Brown GE, Martin F (2001) Oxidation state and coordination of Fe in minerals: an Fe K-XANES spectroscopic study. Am Miner 86:714–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams LB, Haydel SE, Ferrell RE (2009) Bentonite, bandaids, and borborygmi. Elements 5(2):99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang J et al (2012) Effects of redox cycling of iron in nontronite on reduction of technetium. Chem Geol 291:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.CEA Saclay, DEN/DPC/SEARS/LISLGif-Sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations