A Team-Based Approach to Introduce and Sustain the Use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Tanzania
Millions of patients worldwide suffer disability and death due to complications related to surgery. Many of these complications can be reduced by the use of the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), a simple tool that can enhance teamwork and communication and improve patient safety. Despite the evidence on benefits of its use, introducing and sustaining the use of the checklist are challenging. We present a team-based approach employed in a low-resource setting in Tanzania, which resulted in high checklist utilization and compliance rates.
We reviewed reported data from facility registers supplemented by direct observation data by mentors to evaluate the use of the WHO SSC across 40 health facilities in two regions of Tanzania between January and December 2018. We analyzed the self-reported monthly data on total number of major surgeries performed and proportion of surgeries where the checklist was used. We also analyzed the use of the SSC during direct observation by external mentors and completion rates of the SSC in a random selection of patient files during two mentorship visits between June and December 2018.
During the review period, the average self-reported checklist utilization rate was 79.3% (11,564 out of 14,580 major surgeries). SSC utilization increased from 0% at baseline in January 2018 to 98% in December 2018. The proportion of checklists that were completely and correctly filled out increased between the two mentor visits from 82.1 to 92.8%, but the gain was significantly greater at health centers than at hospitals (p < 0.05). Health centers (which had one or two surgical teams) self-reported a higher checklist utilization rate than hospitals (which had multiple surgical teams), i.e., 99.4% vs 68.8% (p < 0.05).
Conclusion and recommendations
Our findings suggest that Surgical Safety Checklist implementation is feasible even in lower-resource settings. The self-reported SSC utilization rate is higher than reported in other similar settings. We attribute this finding to the team-based approach employed and the ongoing regular mentorship. We recommend use of this approach to scale-up checklist use in other regions in the country as recommended in the Ministry of Health of Tanzania’s National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP).
National surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia plan
World Health Organization
Regional/Council Health Management Team
Surgical safety checklist
Safe Surgery 2020 is a unique multi-stakeholder partnership that transforms surgical systems through an ecosystem approach, implemented by Jhpiego, Dalberg, Assist International, Harvard Program on Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), and other stakeholders in surgery, obstetric and anesthesia care. The work presented here involves the commitment and dedication of a multitude of health care workers including facility managers, surgical providers, anesthetists and nurses, as well as district and regional authorities in Kagera and Mara regions. We are grateful for the leadership and collaboration from the Ministry of Health Community Development Gender Elderly and Children and Presidents’ Office Regional Authorities and Local Governments. Adrienne Kols, Sharon Kibwana, Young-Mi Kim, Adam Katoto, Stella Mshana, and Dr Tigistu Adamu Ashengo are acknowledged immensely for their contribution to this work.
AH, LT, and EE drafted the manuscript. EE managed the data, ran reports, and analyzed the data. JV, MB, LF, SM, GG, AK, NK, MD, JZ, AT, SA, RL, and AM provided inputs on the discussion and overall write-up. All authors read and reviewed the drafts of the manuscript.
This project was funded under grant number 5R18HS024235-02 from the GE Foundation and Grant Number 17-F0012 from ELMA Philanthropies. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the GE Foundation or ELMA. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 7.Close KL, Baxter LS, Ravelojaona VA, Rakotoarison HN et al (2017) Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO surgical safety checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar. BMJ Glob Health 2(Suppl 4):e000430. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Alidina S, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Hannenberg AA et al (2018) Factors associated with the use of cognitive aids in operating room crises: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers. Implement Sci IS 13(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0739-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Safe surgery saves lives: the second global patient safety challenge. https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/. Accessed 21 June 2019
- 18.Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL et al (2018) African surgical outcomes study (ASOS) investigators: perioperative patient outcomes in the African surgical outcomes study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 391(10130):1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kariyo PC, Hightower J, Ndihokubwayo JB et al (2013) Challenges facing the introduction of the WHO surgical safety checklist: a short experience in African countries. Afr Health Monit 16:36–39Google Scholar
- 20.Mayer EK, Sevdalis N, Rout S et al (2016) Surgical checklist implementation project: the impact of variable WHO checklist compliance on risk-adjusted clinical outcomes after national implementation: a longitudinal study. Ann Surg 263(1):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001185 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Babu A, Levison A (2012) Effective implementation of WHO surgical safety checklist. British J Anaesth 108(2):ii33–ii34Google Scholar
- 24.Aveling EL, Dixon-Woods M, Mc Culloch P et al (2015). Optimising Surgical Safety Checklist implementation: key lessons for practitioners and partners. University of Leicester. https://hdl.handle.net/2381/32366. ISBN 978–0–9933380–0–7
- 26.White MC, Randall K, Ravelojaona VA et al (2018) Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar. BMJ Glob Health 3:e001104. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjgh-2018-001104CrossRefGoogle Scholar