Advertisement

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score Fails to be a Good Predictor for Secondary Limb Amputation After Trauma with Vascular Injury in Central Europe

  • Gloria Maria HohenbergerEmail author
  • Peter Konstantiniuk
  • Janos Cambiaso-Daniel
  • Veronika Matzi
  • Angelika Maria Schwarz
  • David Benjamin Lumenta
  • Tina Ulrike Cohnert
Original Scientific Report
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was constructed as an objective quantification criterion for limb trauma. A MESS of or greater than 7 was proposed as a cut-off point for primary limb amputation. Opinions concerning the predictive value of the MESS vary broadly in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the MESS in a contemporary civilian Central European cohort.

Methods

All patients treated for extremity injuries with arterial reconstruction at two centres between January 2005 and December 2014 were assessed. The MESS and the amputation rate were determined.

Results

Seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria and could be evaluated for trauma mechanism and injury patterns. The mean MESS was 4.97 (CI 4.4–5.6). Seventy-three per cent of all patients (52/71) had a MESS < 7 and 27% (19/71) of ≥7. Eight patients (11%) underwent secondary amputation. Patients with a MESS ≥ 7 showed a higher, but statistically not significant secondary amputation rate (21.1%; 4/19) than those with a MESS < 7 (7.7%; 4/52; p = 0.20). The area under the ROC curve was 0.57 (95% CI 0.41; 0.73).

Conclusions

Based on these results, the MESS appears to be an inappropriate predictor for amputation in civilian settings in Central Europe possibly due to therapeutic advances in the treatment of orthopaedic, vascular, neurologic and soft-tissue traumas.

Notes

Funding

The study was not supported by any funding sources.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical details

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (27-460 ex 14/15) in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH-GCP Guidelines.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Fox CJ, Gillespie DL, O’Donnell SD et al (2005) Contemporary management of wartime vascular trauma. J Vasc Surg 41:638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doody O, Given MF, Lyon SM (2008) Extremities—indications and techniques for treatment of extremity vascular injuries. Injury 39:1295–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menakuru SR, Behera A, Jindal R et al (2005) Extremity vascular trauma in civilian population: a seven-year review from North India. Injury 36:400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rasouli MR, Moini M, Khaji A (2009) Civilian traumatic vascular injuries of the upper extremity: report of the Iranian national trauma project. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:389–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johansen K, Daines M, Howey T et al (1990) Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma. J Trauma 30:568–572 (discussion 572–573) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korompilias AV, Beris AE, Lykissas MG et al (2009) The mangled extremity and attempt for limb salvage. J Orthop Surg Res 4:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prasarn ML, Helfet DL, Kloen P (2012) Management of the mangled extremity. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 7:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernstein ML, Chung KC (2007) Early management of the mangled upper extremity. Injury 8(Suppl 5):S3–S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mommsen P, Zeckey C, Hildebrand F et al (2010) Traumatic extremity arterial injury in children: epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and prognostic value of Mangled Extremity Severity Score. J Orthop Surg Res 5:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prichayudh S, Verananvattna A, Sriussadaporn S et al (2009) Management of upper extremity vascular injury: outcome related to the Mangled Extremity Severity Score. World J Surg 33:857–863.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9902-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rush RM Jr, Kjorstad R, Starnes BW et al (2007) Application of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score in a combat setting. Mil Med 172:777–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma S, Devgan A, Marya KM et al (2003) Critical evaluation of mangled extremity severity scoring system in Indian patients. Injury 34:493–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown KV, Ramasamy A, McLeod J et al (2009) Predicting the need for early amputation in ballistic mangled extremity injuries. J Trauma 66:S93–S97 (discussion S97–S98) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johansen K, Hansen ST Jr (2015) MESS (Mangled Extremity Severity Score) 25 years on: time for a reboot? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79:495–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tscherne H (1997) Polytrauma management, 1st edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perkins ZB, Yet B, Glasgow S (2015) Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for amputation following surgical repair of lower extremity vascular trauma. Br J Surg 102:436–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barla M, Gavanier B, Mangin M et al (2017) Is amputation a viable treatment option in lower extremity trauma? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:971–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loja MN, Sammann A, DuBose J (2017) The mangled extremity score and amputation: time for a revision. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 82:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Melcer T, Sechriest VF, Wlaker J et al (2013) A comparison of health outcomes for combat amputee and limb salvage patients injured in Iraq and Afghanistan wars. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75:S247–S254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tennent DJ, Wenke JC, Rivera JC (2014) Characterisation and outcomes of upper extremity amputations. Injury 45:965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller EA, Iannuzzi NP, Kennedy SA (2018) Management of the mangled upper extremity: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 6:e11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polonet D, Rose MI, Brown DJ (2017) Amputation versus limb salvage of the lower extremity. In: Elkwood A, Kaufman M, Schneider L (eds) Rehabilitative surgery. Springer, Cham, pp 217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Dongen TT, Huizinga EP, de Kruijff LG (2017) Amputation: not a failure for severe lower extremity combat injury. Injury 48:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gloria Maria Hohenberger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Konstantiniuk
    • 2
  • Janos Cambiaso-Daniel
    • 3
  • Veronika Matzi
    • 4
  • Angelika Maria Schwarz
    • 5
  • David Benjamin Lumenta
    • 3
  • Tina Ulrike Cohnert
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumaMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  3. 3.Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryState Hospital LeobenLeobenAustria
  5. 5.AUVA Trauma Hospital GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations