Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 3101–3109 | Cite as

Impact of Intermittent Pringle Maneuver on Long-Term Survival After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Result from Two Combined Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Kit Fai Lee
  • Charing C. N. Chong
  • Sunny Y. S. Cheung
  • John Wong
  • Andrew K. Y. Fung
  • Hon Ting Lok
  • Paul B. S. LaiEmail author
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Hepatectomy remains an important curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) is commonly applied during hepatectomy for control of bleeding. Whether the ischemia/reperfusion injury brought by IPM adversely affects the operative outcomes is controversial. This study aims to examine whether the application of IPM during hepatectomy affects the long-term outcomes.

Methods

Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been carried out previously to evaluate the short-term outcomes of IPM. The present study represented a post hoc analysis on the HCC patients from the first RCT and all patients from the second RCT, and the long-term outcomes were evaluated.

Results

There were 88 patients each in the IPM group and the no-Pringle-maneuver (NPM) group. The patient demographics, type and extent of liver resection and histopathological findings were comparable between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival in the IPM and NPM groups was 92.0%, 82.0%, 72.1% and 93.2%, 68.8%, 58.1%, respectively (P = 0.030). The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival in the IPM and NPM groups was 73.6%, 56.2%, 49.7% and 71.6%, 49.4%, 40.3%, respectively (P = 0.366). On multivariable analysis, IPM was a favorable factor for overall survival (P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis showed that a clamp time of 16–30 min (P = 0.024) and cirrhotic patients with IPM (P = 0.009) had better overall survival.

Conclusion

IPM provided a better overall survival after hepatectomy for patients with HCC. Such survival benefit was noted in cirrhotic patients, and the beneficial duration of clamp was 16–30 min.

Trial registration

NCT00730743 and NCT01759901 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Philip IP for his assistance in patient randomization, data collection, data processing and statistical analysis.

Funding

Source of funding or grant support for the study: nil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Studies were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong—New Territories East Cluster.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruix J, Gores GJ, Mazzaferro V (2014) Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical frontiers and perspectives. Gut 63:844–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I et al (2001) Liver resections with or without pedicle clamping. Am J Surg 181:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Imamura H, Takayama T, Sugawara Y et al (2002) Pringle's manoeuvre in living donors. Lancet 360:2049–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R et al (1999) Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg 229:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Man K, Fan ST, Ng IO et al (1997) Prospective evaluation of Pringle maneuver in hepatectomy for liver tumors by a randomized study. Ann Surg 226:704–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Man K, Lo CM, Liu CL et al (2003) Effects of the intermittent Pringle manoeuvre on hepatic gene expression and ultrastructure in a randomized clinical study. Br J Surg 90:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capussotti L, Muratore A, Ferrero A et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of liver resection with and without hepatic pedicle clamping. Br J Surg 93:685–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee KF, Cheung YS, Wong J et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of open hepatectomy with or without intermittent Pringle manoeuvre. Br J Surg 99:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee KF, Wong J, Cheung SYS et al (2018) Does intermittent Pringle maneuver Increase postoperative complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma? A randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 42:3302–3311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4637-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishizuka M, Kubota K, Kita J et al (2011) Duration of hepatic vascular inflow clamping and survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:1284–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hao S, Chen S, Yang X et al (2016) Impact of intermittent portal clamping on the early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. Surg Today 46:1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia F, Lau WY, Xu Y et al (2013) Does hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury induced by hepatic pedicle clamping affect survival after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma? World J Surg 37:192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1781-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang J, Tang W, Hernandez-Alejandro R et al (2014) Intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion during partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma does not shorten overall survival or increase the likelihood of tumor recurrence. Medicine (Baltimore) 93:e288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 systems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YI (2003) Ischemia-reperfusion injury of the human liver during hepatic resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doi K, Horiuchi T, Uchinami M et al (2002) Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion promotes liver metastasis of colon cancer. J Surg Res 105(243):247Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van der Bilt JD, Soeters ME, Duyverman AM et al (2007) Perinecrotic hypoxia contributes to ischemia/reperfusion-accelerated outgrowth of colorectal micrometastases. Am J Pathol 170:1379–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim C, Broqueres-You D, Brouland JP et al (2013) Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion increases circulating bone marrow-derived progenitor cells and tumor growth in a mouse model of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Res 184:888–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Bilt JD, Livestro DP, Borren A et al (2007) European survey on the application of vascular clamping in liver surgery. Dig Surg 24:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakajima Y, Shimamura T, Kamiyama T et al (2002) Control of intraoperative bleeding during liver resection: analysis of a questionnaire sent to 231 Japanese hospitals. Surg Today 32:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Famularo S, Giani A, Di Sandro S et al (2018) Does the Pringle maneuver affect survival and recurrence following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma? A western series of 441 patients. J Surg Oncol 117:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang CC, Iyer SG, Low JK et al (2009) Perioperative factors affecting long-term outcomes of 473 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1832–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu S, Li X, Li H et al (2016) Longer duration of the Pringle maneuver is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following curative resection. J Surg Oncol 114:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hao S, Chen S, Yang X et al (2017) Adverse impact of intermittent portal clamping on long-term postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nijkamp MW, van der Bilt JD, Snoeren N et al (2010) Prolonged portal triad clamping during liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases is associated with decreased time to hepatic tumour recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wong KH, Hamady ZZ, Malik HZ et al (2008) Intermittent Pringle manoeuvre is not associated with adverse long-term prognosis after resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 95:985–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiss MJ, Ito H, Araujo RL et al (2013) Hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: no impact on survival or hepatic recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 20:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giuliante F, Ardito F, Pulitanò C et al (2010) Does hepatic pedicle clamping affect disease-free survival following liver resection for colorectal metastases? Ann Surg 252:1020–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S et al (2013) Hepatic pedicle clamping does not worsen survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3771–3778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Viganò L et al (2010) Does Pringle maneuver affect survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases? World J Surg 34:2418–2425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0682-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van der Bilt JD, Kranenburg O, Nijkamp MW et al (2005) Ischemia/reperfusion accelerates the outgrowth of hepatic micrometastases in a highly standardized murine model. Hepatology 42:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tanaka K, Shimada H, Matsuo K et al (2008) Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma developing extrahepatic recurrences after curative resection. World J Surg 32:1738–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9613-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    De Carlis L, Di Sandro S, Giacomoni A et al (2013) Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis Eur J Surg Oncol 39:726–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li X, Liu S, Li H et al (2016) Proper hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy is associated with improved postoperative long-term prognosis in patients with AJCC stage IIIB hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 7:24623–24632PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kit Fai Lee
    • 1
  • Charing C. N. Chong
    • 1
  • Sunny Y. S. Cheung
    • 1
  • John Wong
    • 1
  • Andrew K. Y. Fung
    • 1
  • Hon Ting Lok
    • 1
  • Paul B. S. Lai
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales HospitalThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin, N.T.China

Personalised recommendations