Advertisement

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

  • Nobuyuki Watanabe
  • Tomoki Ebata
  • Yukihiro Yokoyama
  • Tsuyoshi Igami
  • Takashi Mizuno
  • Junpei Yamaguchi
  • Shunsuke Onoe
  • Masato NaginoEmail author
Original Scientific Report
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Background

There are numerous studies on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in pancreatic surgery but few studies on POPF in extrahepatic bile duct resection with or without hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for POPF in this challenging surgery.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for presumed PHCC between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, with special attention paid to POPF.

Results

Among 416 patients, 90 patients showed a drain amylase level of > 3 times the normal limit on day 3 or after. The severity of POPF was biochemical leakage in 46 patients and grade B in 44 patients. No patient had grade C POPF; thus, the incidence of clinically relevant POPF was 10.6% (44/416). The resection line of the common bile duct was closely associated with POPF; 23 (27.7%) of the 83 patients who underwent intrapancreatic resection of the common bile duct developed POPF. The occurrence of intra-abdominal abscess and liver failure was significantly higher in patients with POPF, but the 90-day mortality was similar. The multivariate analysis identified a body mass index of ≥ 22 and intrapancreatic bile duct resection as independent risk factors for POPF.

Conclusions

POPF occurs in approximately 10% of patients undergoing resection for PHCC. Careful postoperative management with attention to POPF is required, especially in patients who undergo intrapancreatic resection of the common bile duct and in those with a high body mass index.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board.

References

  1. 1.
    Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y et al (2013) Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg 258:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S et al (2010) Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D et al (2013) Multicenter European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 100:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pulvirenti A, Marchegiani G, Pea A et al (2018) Clinical implications of the 2016 International Study Group on pancreatic surgery definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula on 775 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 268:1069–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eshmuminov D, Schneider MA, Tschuor C et al (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula rates using the updated 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula definition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection with soft and hard pancreatic texture. HPB (Oxford) 20:992–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noji T, Okamura K, Tanaka K et al (2018) Surgical technique and results of intrapancreatic bile duct resection for hilar malignancy (with video). HPB 20:1145–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagino M, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y et al (1992) Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction of the hepatic confluence. Hepatogastroenterology 39:296–300Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E et al (2013) Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg 257:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2006) Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg 243:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otsuka S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y et al (2019) Clinical value of additional resection of a margin-positive distal bile duct in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 106:774–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery (JSBS) (2013) General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of the biliary tract, 6th edition. Kanehara, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagino M, Kamiya J, Kanai M et al (2002) Hepaticojejunostomy using a Roux-en-Y jejunal limb via the retrocolic-retrogastric route. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:188–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T et al (2007) Intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy following hepatobiliary resection. Br J Surg 94:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ito A, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y et al (2018) Ethanol ablation for refractory bile leakage after complex hepatectomy. Br J Surg 105:1036–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sugawara G, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y et al (2013) The effect of preoperative biliary drainage on infectious complications after hepatobiliary resection with cholangiojejunostomy. Surgery 153:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sato Y, Inokuchi M, Otsuki S et al (2017) Risk factor of pancreatic fistula after radical gastrectomy from the viewpoint of fatty pancreas. Dig Surg 34:455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S et al (2012) Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H et al (2011) Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery 149:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nobuoka D, Gotohda N, Konishi M et al (2008) Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after total gastrectomy. World J Surg 32:2261–2266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9683-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanaka K, Miyashiro I, Yano M et al (2009) Accumulation of excess visceral fat is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula formation after total gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1520–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkotter S et al (2016) No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707). Ann Surg 264:528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Buren G II, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ et al (2014) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Molina V, Sampson J, Ferrer J et al (2017) Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: early results of en bloc portal vein resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 402:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Jong MC, Marques H, Clary BM et al (2012) The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases. Cancer 118:4737–4747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hassenpflug M, Hartwig W, Strobel O et al (2012) Decrease in clinically relevant pancreatic fistula by coverage of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 152:S164–S171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peter JA, Mithat G, Murray FB et al (2014) Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. NEJM 370:2014–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuyuki Watanabe
    • 1
  • Tomoki Ebata
    • 1
  • Yukihiro Yokoyama
    • 1
  • Tsuyoshi Igami
    • 1
  • Takashi Mizuno
    • 1
  • Junpei Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Shunsuke Onoe
    • 1
  • Masato Nagino
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations