World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 2994–3002 | Cite as

Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis in a Low-Volume Hospital

  • Alvaro Robin-LersundiEmail author
  • Ana Abella Alvarez
  • Carlos San Miguel Mendez
  • Almudena Moreno Elalo-Olaso
  • Arturo Cruz Cidoncha
  • Asunción Aguilera Velardo
  • Federico Gordo Vidal
  • Miguel-Angel García-Ureña
Original Scientific Report



Up to 25% of patients with acute pancreatitis develop severe complications and are classified as severe pancreatitis with a high death rate. To improve outcomes, patients may require interventional measures including surgical procedures. Multidisciplinary approach and best practice guidelines are important to decrease mortality.


We have conducted a retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database in a low-volume hospital. A total of 1075 patients were attended for acute pancreatitis over a ten-year period. We have analysed 44 patients meeting the criteria for severe acute pancreatitis and for intensive care unit (ICU) admittance. Demographics and clinical data were analysed. Patients were treated according to international guidelines and a multidisciplinary flowchart for acute pancreatitis and a step-up approach for pancreatic necrosis.


Forty-four patients were admitted to the ICU due to severe acute pancreatitis. Twenty-five patients needed percutaneous drainage of peri-pancreatic or abdominal fluid collections or cholecystitis. Eight patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis and biliary sepsis or pancreatic leakage, and one patient received endoscopic trans-gastric endoscopic prosthesis for pancreatic necrosis. Sixteen patients underwent surgery: six patients for septic abdomen, four patients for pancreatic necrosis and two patients due to abdominal compartment syndrome. Four patients had a combination of surgical procedures for pancreatic necrosis and for abdominal compartment syndrome. Overall mortality was 9.1%.


Severe acute pancreatitis represents a complex pathology that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Establishing best practice treatments and evidence-based guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis may improve outcomes in low-volume hospitals.



This study has not received grant support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J et al (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143:1179–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts SE, Morrison-Rees S, John A et al (2017) The incidence and aetiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology 17:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Sullivan T (2009) The changing character of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, and prognosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 11:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fenton-Lee D, Imrie CW (1993) Pancreatic necrosis: assessment of outcome related to quality of life and cost of management. Br J Surg 80:1579–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines (2013) IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 13:1–15Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ et al (2010) A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 22:1491–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF et al (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139:69–81PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ranson JH (1982) Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 77:633–638PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ et al (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E et al (2005) SAPS 3-From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG et al (2008) The Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg 95:6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tee YS, Fang HY, Kuo IM et al (2018) Serial evaluation of the SOFA score is reliable for predicting mortality in acute severe pancreatitis. Medicine 97:e9654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J et al (2013) Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med 39:1190–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Waele JJ, Kimball E, Malbrain M et al (2016) Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome. Br J Surg 103:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    George J, Meghij S, Shah J et al (2016) Open pancreatic necrosectomy. A six year experience from a DGH. HPB 18:e782–e787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singla A, Simons J, Li Y et al (2009) Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 137:1995–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T et al (2011) Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 40:1018–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vincent JL, Sharon E, Pearse R et al (2018) Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment. Eur J Anaesthesiol 35:325–333PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gordo F, Molina R (2018) Evolution to the early detection of severity. Where are we going? Med Intensiva 42:47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrov MS, Pylypchuk RD, Uchugina AF (2009) A systematic review on the timing of artificial nutrition in acute pancreatitis. Br J Nutr 101:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malbrain ML, De laet I, Cheatham M (2007) Consensus conference definitions and recommendations on intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)—the long road to the final publications, how did we get there? Acta Clin Belg 62(44):59Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zerem E (2014) Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications. World J Gastroenterol 14:13879–13892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T et al (2015) Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:405–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamada S, Masamune A, Shimosegawa T (2016) Management of acute pancreatitis in Japan: analysis of a nationwide epidemiological survey. World J Gastroenterol 28:6335–6344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Connor S, Ghaneh P, Raraty M et al (2003) Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy. Dig Surg 20:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raraty MG, Halloran CM, Dodd S et al (2010) Minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy: improvement in morbidity and mortality with a less invasive approach. Ann Surg 251:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sugimoto M, Sonntag DP, Flint GS et al (2015) A percutaneous drainage protocol for severe and moderately severe acute pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 29:3282–3291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL et al (2011) A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 141:1254–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Horvath KD, Kao LS, Wherry KL et al (2001) A technique for laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess. Surg Endosc 15:1221–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S et al (2012) Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 307:1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yip HC, Bun Teoh AY (2017) Endoscopic management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections. Gut and Liver 11:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thorsen A, Borch AM, Novovic S et al (2018) Endoscopic necrosectomy through percutaneous selfexpanding metal stents may be a promising additive in treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 63:2456–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Brunschot S, Schut AJ, Bouwense SA et al (2014) Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas 43:665–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hamada T, Yasunaga H, Nakai Y et al (2014) Impact of hospital volume on outcomes in acute pancreatitis: a study using a nationwide administrative database. J Gastroenterol 49(1):148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shen Hsiu-Nien, Chin-Li Lu, Li Chung-Yi (2012) The effect of hospital volume on patient outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol 12:112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yokoe Masamichi (2014) Does higher hospital volume improve the patient outcome in acute pancreatitis? J Gastroenterol 49:371–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alvaro Robin-Lersundi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Abella Alvarez
    • 2
  • Carlos San Miguel Mendez
    • 1
  • Almudena Moreno Elalo-Olaso
    • 1
  • Arturo Cruz Cidoncha
    • 1
  • Asunción Aguilera Velardo
    • 1
  • Federico Gordo Vidal
    • 2
    • 3
  • Miguel-Angel García-Ureña
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHospital Universitario del HenaresCosladaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Intensive Care MedicineHospital Universitario del HenaresCosladaSpain
  3. 3.Grupo de Investigación en Patología CríticaUniversidad Francisco de VitoriaPozuelo de AlarcónSpain
  4. 4.Grupo de Investigación en Pared AbdominalUniversidad Francisco de VitoriaPozuelo de AlarcónSpain

Personalised recommendations