Advertisement

Postoperative Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Early Catheter Removal: A Prospective Observational Study

  • Jens Ravn EriksenEmail author
  • Pia Munk-Madsen
  • Henrik Kehlet
  • Ismail Gögenur
Original Scientific Report
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Early catheter removal is essential to enhance postoperative mobilization and recovery, but may carry a risk of urinary retention. This study aimed to evaluate a standardized regimen for early postoperative catheter removal and re-catheterization in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an optimal ERAS setting.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective study of patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal resection and postoperative catheter removal within 24 h, with a re-catheterization threshold of 800 ml bladder volume. The primary outcome was postoperative urinary retention rate, and the secondary outcomes were time of catheter removal and length of stay with a special focus on differences between colon and rectal resections.

Results

A total of 113 patients were included in the study, and 87 patients were eligible for the final analysis. Rectal resection was performed in 22 of 87 patients, and all operations were performed with minimally invasive technique. The conversion rate was 3.5%, and 30-day mortality was 0%. More than 95% of the patients had their catheter removed within 24 h with no difference between rectal and colonic resections. Postoperative urinary retention was observed in 9% of all patients (rectum 18% vs. colon 6%, p = 0.11). One patient had an indwelling catheter at discharge, but all patients had free voluntary micturition at 30-day follow-up. Median length of stay was 3 days (1–13 days).

Conclusions

Catheter removal within 24 h of surgery using a re-catheterization threshold of 800 ml is safe and reduces unnecessary re-catheterizations following minimally invasive colorectal resection.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the expert clinical staff on Zealand University Hospital, Department of Surgery A77, Roskilde, and a special thanks to colorectal surgeon Dr. Michael Seiersen.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwaan MR, Lee JT, Rothenberger DA et al (2015) Early removal of urinary catheter after rectal surgery is associated with increased urinary retention. Dis Colon Rectum 58:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hendren S (2013) Urinary catheter management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basse L, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) Is urinary drainage necessary during continuous epidural analgesia after colonic resection? Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:498–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G et al (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60:761–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wald HL, Ma A, Bratzler DW et al (2008) Indwelling urinary catheter use in the postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data. Arch Surg 143:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bjerregaard LS, Hornum U, Troldborg C et al (2016) Postoperative urinary catheterization thresholds of 500 versus 800 ml after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial. Anesthesiology 124:1256–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Avery K, Donovan J, Peters T (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen BJ, Flyger H, Brasso K et al (1995) Validation of the self-administered Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS-1) system for use in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol 76:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery. A review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coyle D, Joyce KM, Garvin JT et al (2015) Early post-operative removal of urethral catheter in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with epidural analgesia—a prospective pilot clinical study. Int J Surg 16:94–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Braga M, Scatizzi M, Borghi F et al (2018) Identification of core items in the enhanced recovery pathway. Clin Nutr ESPEN 25:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okrainec A, Aarts MA, Conn LG et al (2017) Compliance with urinary catheter removal guidelines leads to improved outcome in enhanced recovery after surgery patients. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1309–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grass F, Slieker J, Frauche P (2017) Postoperative urinary retention in colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. J Surg Res 207:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Basse L, Thorbøl JE, Løssl K et al (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patel DN, Felder SI, Luu M et al (2018) Early urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial. Dis Colon Rectum 61:1180–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kin C, Rhoads KF, Jalali M et al (2013) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56:738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A et al (2009) Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 110:1139–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts ST, Patel K, Smith SR (2018) Impact of avoiding post-operative urinary catheters on outcomes following colorectal resection in an ERAS programme: no IDUC and ERAS programmes. ANZ J Surg 88:E390–E394CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorectal Cancer Unit, Department of SurgeryZealand University Hospital, RoskildeRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations