Advertisement

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Talc Pleurodesis Versus Pleurectomy for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Large Single-Centre Study with No Conversion

  • Harish MithiranEmail author
  • Lowell Leow
  • Kingsfield Ong
  • Terence Liew
  • Daveraj Siva
  • Shen Liang
  • John Kit Chung Tam
Original Scientific Report
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a relatively common clinical entity with high incidence in the young population. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) bullectomy and chemical or mechanical pleurodesis are two primary modalities of treatment. There has been much debate on the ideal mode of pleurodesis, but the literature on surgical outcomes comparing VATS pleurectomy with talc pleurodesis has been inconclusive.

Methods

We performed a single-centre 5-year observational retrospective study of 202 patients who underwent VATS bullectomy with talc pleurodesis or parietal pleurectomy.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographics, pre-operative and intra-operative characteristics in both groups. Recurrence of pneumothorax, chest tube duration and hospital stay were similar in both groups. However, talc pleurodesis had a shorter operative time compared to pleurectomy.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated comparable outcomes between talc pleurodesis and pleurectomy following VATS bullectomy for patients with PSP.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J (2010) Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British thoracic society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 65(Suppl 2):ii18–ii31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadikot RT, Greene T, Meadows K, Arnold AG (1997) Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax 52(9):805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo Y, Xie C, Rodriguez RM, Light RW (2005) Factors related to recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax. Respirology (Carlton, VIC) 10(3):378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiu CY, Chen TP, Wang CJ, Tsai MH, Wong KS (2014) Factors associated with proceeding to surgical intervention and recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adolescent patients. Eur J Pediatr 173(11):1483–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tulay CM, Ozsoy IE (2015) Spontaneous pneumothorax recurrence and surgery. Indian J Surg 77(Suppl 2):463–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gyorik S, Erni S, Studler U, Hodek-Wuerz R, Tamm M, Chhajed PN (2007) Long-term follow-up of thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 29(4):757–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horio H, Nomori H, Kobayashi R, Naruke T, Suemasu K (2002) Impact of additional pleurodesis in video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 16(4):630–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muramatsu T, Ohmori K, Shimamura M, Furuichi M, Takeshita S, Negishi N (2007) Staple line reinforcement with fleece-coated fibrin glue (TachoComb) after thoracoscopic bullectomy for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Today 37(9):745–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakanishi K (2009) Long-term effect of a thoracoscopic stapled bullectomy alone for preventing the recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Today 39(7):553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakamoto K, Takei H, Nishii T, Maehara T, Omori T, Tajiri M et al (2004) Staple line coverage with absorbable mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 18(3):478–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neudecker J, Malzahn U, Heuschmann P, Behrens U, Walles T (2015) Pulmonary wedge resection plus parietal pleurectomy (WRPP) versus parietal pleurectomy (PP) for the treatment of recurrent primary pneumothorax (WOPP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16:540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Imperatori A, Rotolo N, Spagnoletti M, Festi L, Berizzi F, Di Natale D et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax treated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 20(5):647–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sepehripour AH, Nasir A, Shah R (2012) Does mechanical pleurodesis result in better outcomes than chemical pleurodesis for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14(3):307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vanderschueren RG (1990) The role of thoracoscopy in the evaluation and management of pneumothorax. Lung 168(Suppl):1122–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bertrand PC, Regnard JF, Spaggiari L, Levi JF, Magdeleinat P, Guibert L et al (1996) Immediate and long-term results after surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by VATS. Ann Thorac Surg 61(6):1641–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrmann D, Klapdor B, Ewig S, Hecker E (2016) Initial management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a 10-year experience. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 49(3):854–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rena O, Massera F, Papalia E, Della Pona C, Robustellini M, Casadio C (2008) Surgical pleurodesis for Vanderschueren’s stage III primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 31(4):837–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaikhrezai K, Thompson AI, Parkin C, Stamenkovic S, Walker WS (2011) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery management of spontaneous pneumothorax—long-term results. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 40(1):120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huh U, Kim YD, Cho JS, Hoseok I, Lee JG, Lee JH (2012) The effect of thoracoscopic pleurodesis in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: apical parietal pleurectomy versus pleural abrasion. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 45(5):316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sudduth CL, Shinnick JK, Geng Z, McCracken CE, Clifton MS, Raval MV (2017) Optimal surgical technique in spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 210:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen JS, Hsu HH, Huang PM, Kuo SW, Lin MW, Chang CC et al (2012) Thoracoscopic pleurodesis for primary spontaneous pneumothorax with high recurrence risk: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 255(3):440–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joharifard S, Coakley BA, Butterworth SA (2017) Pleurectomy versus pleural abrasion for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children. J Pediatr Surg 52(5):680–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hallifax RJ, Yousuf A, Jones HE, Corcoran JP, Psallidas I, Rahman NM (2017) Effectiveness of chemical pleurodesis in spontaneous pneumothorax recurrence prevention: a systematic review. Thorax 72(12):1121–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kennedy L, Sahn SA (1994) Talc pleurodesis for the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusion. Chest 106(4):1215–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rehse DH, Aye RW, Florence MG (1999) Respiratory failure following talc pleurodesis. Am J Surg 177(5):437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muscat JE, Huncharek MS (2008) Perineal talc use and ovarian cancer: a critical review. Eur J Cancer Prev Off J Eur Cancer Prev Organ (ECP) 17(2):139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chang CJ, Tu YK, Chen PC, Yang HY (2017) Occupational exposure to talc increases the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of occupational cohort studies. Can Respir J 2017:1270608Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wild P (2006) Lung cancer risk and talc not containing asbestiform fibres: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med 63(1):4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lange P, Mortensen J, Groth S (1988) Lung function 22–35 years after treatment of idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax with talc poudrage or simple drainage. Thorax 43(7):559–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Research Committee of the British Thoracic Association and the Medical Research Council Pneumoconiosis Unit (1979) A survey of the long-term effects of talc and kaolin pleurodesis. Br J Dis Chest 73(3):285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hunt I, Barber B, Southon R, Treasure T (2007) Is talc pleurodesis safe for young patients following primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6(1):117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wagner JC, Berry G, Cooke TJ, Hill RJ, Pooley FD, Skidmore JW (1975) Animal experiments with talc. Inhaled Part 4(Pt 2):647–654Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krismann M, Pieper K, Muller KM (1998) Pleural reaction pattern after talc pleurodesis. Der Pathologe 19(3):214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cardillo G, Carleo F, Carbone L, Di Martino M, Salvadori L, Ricci A et al (2007) Long-term lung function following videothoracoscopic talc poudrage for primary spontaneous recurrent pneumothorax. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 31(5):802–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tschopp JM, Brutsche M, Frey JG (1997) Treatment of complicated spontaneous pneumothorax by simple talc pleurodesis under thoracoscopy and local anaesthesia. Thorax 52(4):329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dubois L, Malthaner RA (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy and talc poudrage for spontaneous pneumothoraces: effect on short-term lung function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140(6):1272–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ahmadzadehfar H, Palmedo H, Strunk H, Biersack HJ, Habibi E, Ezziddin S (2007) False positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a patient after talc pleurodesis. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 58(3):418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gomez-Caro A, Moradiellos FJ, Larru E, Diaz-Hellin V, Marron C, Perez-Anton JA et al (2006) Effectiveness and complications of video-assisted surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Arch Bronconeumol 42(2):57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu HP, Yim AP, Izzat MB, Lin PJ, Chang CH (1999) Thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. World J Surg 23(11):1133–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yim AP, Liu HP (1996) Complications and failures of video-assisted thoracic surgery: experience from two centers in Asia. Ann Thorac Surg 61(2):538–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Min X, Huang Y, Yang Y, Chen Y, Cui J, Wang C et al (2014) Mechanical pleurodesis does not reduce recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 98(5):1790–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Regal M, Carbone L, Corzani F, Ricci A et al (2001) Recurrences following videothoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: the role of redo-videothoracoscopy. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 19(4):396–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Doddoli C, Barlesi F, Fraticelli A, Thomas P, Astoul P, Giudicelli R et al (2004) Video-assisted thoracoscopic management of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax after prior talc pleurodesis: a feasible, safe and efficient treatment option. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 26(5):889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, National University Heart Centre SingaporeNational University Health System, SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Medicine Biostatistics UnitNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations