Impact of Body Composition on Surgical Outcome in Rectal Cancer Patients, a Retrospective Cohort Study
Obesity is becoming a bigger health problem every year. Current research shows that the obesity-related metabolic problems are strongly associated with visceral fat and not subcutaneous fat. Visceral obesity (VO) is associated with a worse postoperative outcome in multiple fields of abdominal surgery. On the other hand, muscle mass is related to better postoperative outcome. In rectal cancer patients, we studied the influence of visceral obesity and muscle mass on postoperative complications.
The visceral fat area (VFA) and skeletal muscle area (SMA) were determined on preoperative CT scans in 406 patients. The preoperative comorbidity, per-operative outcome and postoperative complications were extracted retrospectively from the patient files. VO was defined as a VFA > 100 cm2. Correlations between body composition, postoperative complications and LOS were studied.
In our study, 67% of the patients were classified as visceral obese. Mean body mass index (BMI) was higher in the VO group (26.6 ± 3.5 vs 23.5 ± 2.8; p < 0.001). Visceral obese patients had a higher prevalence of cardiac comorbidity (29% vs 13% p = 0.001), hypertension (36% vs 20% p = 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (16% vs 5% p = 0.002). In addition, VO patients had more operative blood loss (431 vs 310 mL; p = 0.008), longer operating time (166 vs 149 min p = 0.003) and more wound infections (14% vs 8% p = 0.048). Visceral obesity was associated with more complications (OR: 1.63 p = 0.043) and longer LOS (risk estimate: 1.18 p = 0.009).
VO patients more often had a history of cardiac disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Visceral obesity correlated with a worse outcome after surgery for rectal cancer.
AH and CH designed the study. NB, WM and CH collected the data. HD and CH did the analysis of the data. CH and AH drafted the manuscript. All other authors critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.WHO technical report series (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic, p 6–36. www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en/
- 22.Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Thavayogan R, Orgill DP, for the STROCSS Group (2017) The STROCSS statement: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 46:198–202Google Scholar
- 32.Milgrom SA, Goodman KA, Nash GM, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Temple LK, Weiser MR, Garcia-Aguilar J (2014) Neoadjuvant radiation therapy prior to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is not associated with postoperative complications using current techniques. Ann Surg Oncol 21(7):2295–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.van Dijk DP, Bakens MJ, Coolsen MM, Rensen SS, van Dam RM, Bours MJ, Weijenberg MP, Dejong CH, Olde Damink SW (2017) Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Slentz CA, Bateman LA, Willis LH, Shields AT, Tanner CJ, Piner LW (2011) Effects of aerobic vs. resistance training on visceral and liver fat stores, liver enzymes, and insulin resistance by HOMA in overweight adults from STRRIDE AT/RT. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 5:1033–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar