Advertisement

Identifying Information Gaps in a Surgical Capacity Assessment Tool for Developing Countries: A Methodological Triangulation Approach

  • Obieze C. Nwanna-Nzewunwa
  • Mary Margaret Ajiko
  • Girish Motwani
  • Fiona Kabagenyi
  • Melissa Carvalho
  • Isabelle Feldhaus
  • Fred Kirya
  • Joseph Epodoi
  • Rochelle Dicker
  • Catherine JuillardEmail author
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Surgical capacity assessment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. The Surgeon OverSeas’ Personnel Infrastructure Procedure Equipment and Supplies (PIPES) survey tool has been proposed to address this challenge. There is a need to examine the gaps in veracity and context appropriateness of the information obtained using the PIPES tool.

Methods

We performed a methodological triangulation by comparing and contrasting information obtained using the PIPES tool with information obtained simultaneously via three other methods: time and motion study (T&M); provider focus group discussions (FGDs); and a retrospective review of hospital records.

Results

In its native state, the PIPES survey does not capture the role of non-physician clinicians who contribute immensely to surgical care delivery in LMICs. The surgical workforce was more accurately captured by the FGDs and T&M. It may also not reflect the improvisations (e.g., patients sharing beds, partitioning the operating theater, and using preoperative rooms for surgery, etc.) that occur to expand surgical capacity to overcome the limited infrastructure and equipment.

Conclusions

The PIPES tool captures vital surgical capacity information but has gaps that can be filled by modifying the tool and/or using ancillary methodologies. The interests of the researcher and the local stakeholders’ perspectives should inform such modifications.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2015) WHO | Tracking universal health coverage: first global monitoring reportGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization, The World Bank (2017) Tracking universal health coverage: 2017 global monitoring report. doi:Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGOGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Price R, Makasa E, Hollands M (2015) World Health Assembly Resolution WHA68.15: “strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage”—addressing the public health gaps arising from lack of safe, affordable and accessible surgical anesthetic services. World J Surg 39:2115–2125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3153-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization (2016) Universal health coverage (UHC). WHO factsheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs395/en/. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  5. 5.
    Okoroh JS, Chia V, Oliver EA, Dharmawardene M, Riviello R (2015) Strengthening health systems of developing countries: inclusion of surgery in universal health coverage. World J Surg 39:1867–1874.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3031-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong EG, Deckelbaum DL, Razek T (2015) Global access to surgical care: moving forward. Lancet Glob Health 3:e298–e299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00004-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, Weiser TG, Bickler SW, Rose JA et al (2015) Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 3:e316–e323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70115-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazumdar T (2015) Five billion people ‘have no access to safe surgery’. BBC News. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/health-32452249. Accessed 21 Aug 2015
  9. 9.
    Myles PS, Haller G (2010) Global distribution of access to surgical services. Lancet 376:1027–1028.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60520-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiser TG, Makary MA, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Gawande AA et al (2009) Standardised metrics for global surgical surveillance. Lancet 374:1113–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61161-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meadows JW, McQueen K (2016) Benchmarking surgical systems 2015–30: application of indicators from The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery for an indicator-based, near real-time capacity-building index. Lancet Glob Health 4:29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30034-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (2015) Global surgery 2030: implementation. http://www.lancetglobalsurgery.org/implementation-tools. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  13. 13.
    Stewart BT, Gyedu A, Gaskill C, Boakye G, Quansah R, Donkor P et al (2018) Exploring the relationship between surgical capacity and output in Ghana: current capacity assessments may not tell the whole story. World J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4589-7 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    World Health Organization (n.d.) Tool for situational analysis to assess emergency and essential surgical care. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s15986e.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  15. 15.
    Surgeons OverSeas (n.d.) SOS PIPES surgical capacity assessment tool. https://www.surgeonsoverseas.org/resources/. Accessed 12 Aug 2015
  16. 16.
    Holtzhausen S (2001) Triangulation as a powerful tool to strengthen the qualitative research design: the Resource-based Learning Career Preparation Programme (RBLCPP) as a case study. In: High Education Close Up Conference 2, Lancaster University, pp 2–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denzin NK (2009) Strategies for multiple triangulation. In: the research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 297-313Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ (2014) The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 41:545–547.  https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nwanna-Nzewunwa OC, Ajiko M-M, Kirya F, Epodoi J, Kabagenyi F, Batibwe E, Feldhaus I, Juillard C et al (2016) Barriers and facilitators of surgical care in rural Uganda: a mixed methods study. J Surg Res 204:242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, Thind A (2006) Surgery. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1245–1260Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henry JA, Orgoi S, Govind S, Price RR, Lundeg G, Kehrer B (2012) Strengthening surgical services at the soum (First-referral) hospital: the WHO Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (EESC) Program in Mongolia. World J Surg 36:2359–2370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1668-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ploss B, Abdelgadir J, Smith ER, Fuller A, Ricardo J, Vissoci N et al (2017) Pilot use of a novel tool to assess neurosurgical capacity in Uganda. World Neurosurg 108:844–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blair KJ, Boeck MA, Barrientos JLG, López JLH, Helenowski IB, Nwomeh BC, Shapiro MB, Swaroop M (2017) Assessment of surgical and trauma capacity in Potosí, Bolivia. Ann Glob Health 83:262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beard JH, Oresanya LB, Akoko L, Mwanga A, Mkony CA, Dicker RA (2014) Surgical task-shifting in a low-resource setting: outcomes after major surgery performed by nonphysician clinicians in Tanzania. World J Surg 38:1398–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2446-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aliu O, Corlew SD, Heisler ME, Pannucci CJ, Chung KC, Beard JH et al (2014) Surgical task-shifting in a low-resource setting: outcomes after major surgery performed by nonphysician clinicians in Tanzania. World J Surg 38:104–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2928-x Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mullan F, Frehywot S (2007) Non-physician clinicians in 47 sub-Saharan African countries. Lancet 370:2158–2163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60785-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pereira C, Cumbi A, Malalane R, Vaz F, McCord C, Bacci A et al (2007) Meeting the need for emergency obstetric care in Mozambique: work performance and histories of medical doctors and assistant medical officers trained for surgery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114:1530–1533.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01489.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kwon S, Kingham TP, Kamara TB, Sherman L, Natuzzi E, Mock C et al (2012) Development of a surgical capacity index: opportunities for assessment and improvement. World J Surg 36:232–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1385-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chu KM, Ford NP, Trelles M (2011) Providing surgical care in Somalia: a model of task shifting. Confl Health 5:12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Henry JA, Frenkel E, Borgstein E, Mkandawire N, Goddia C (2014) Surgical and anaesthetic capacity of hospitals in Malawi: key insights. Health Policy Plan.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu102 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Obieze C. Nwanna-Nzewunwa
    • 1
  • Mary Margaret Ajiko
    • 2
  • Girish Motwani
    • 1
  • Fiona Kabagenyi
    • 2
  • Melissa Carvalho
    • 1
  • Isabelle Feldhaus
    • 1
  • Fred Kirya
    • 2
  • Joseph Epodoi
    • 2
  • Rochelle Dicker
    • 3
  • Catherine Juillard
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital & Trauma Center, Center for Global Surgical StudiesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySoroti Regional Referral HospitalSorotiUganda
  3. 3.Department of Surgical Critical CareUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations