Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 929–936 | Cite as

Intraoperative Fluid Administration and Surgical Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: External Validation at a Tertiary Referral Center

  • M. Sandini
  • C. Fernández-del Castillo
  • C. R. Ferrone
  • K. J. Ruscic
  • M. Eikermann
  • A. L. Warshaw
  • K. D. Lillemoe
  • M. QadanEmail author
Original Scientific Report (including Papers Presented at Surgical Conferences)
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Background

While intraoperative fluid overload is associated with higher complication rates following surgery, data for pancreaticoduodenectomy are scarce and heterogeneous. We evaluated multiple prior definitions of restrictive and liberal fluid regimens and analyzed whether these affected surgical outcomes at our tertiary referral center.

Methods

Studies evaluating different intraoperative fluid regimens on outcomes after pancreatic resections were retrieved. After application of all prior definitions of restrictive and liberal fluid regimens to our patient cohort, relative risks of each outcome were calculated using all reported infusion regimens.

Results

Five hundred and seven pancreaticoduodenectomies were included. Nine different fluid regimens were evaluated. Two regimens utilized absolute volume cutoffs, and the remaining evaluated various infusion rates, ranging from 5 to 15 mL/kg/h. Total volume administration of >5000 mL and >6000 mL was associated with increased complications (RR 1.25 and RR 1.17, respectively) and >6000 mL with increased sepsis (RR 2.14). Conversely, a rate of <5 mL/kg/h was associated with increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF, RR 3.16) and sepsis (RR 3.20), <6.8 mL/kg/h with increased major morbidity (RR 1.64) and sepsis (RR 2.27), and <8.2 mL/kg/h with increased POPF (RR 2.16). No effects were observed on pulmonary complications, surgical site infections, length of stay, or mortality.

Conclusions

In an uncontrolled setting with no standard intraoperative or postoperative care map, the volume of intraoperative fluid administration appears to have limited impact on early postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy, with adverse outcomes only seen at extreme values.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Supplementary material

268_2018_4842_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220(4):530–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, Parks RW, Fearon KC, Lobo DN, Demartines N, Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Dejong CH, ERAS® Society; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism; International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, Rosenberg LM, Doria C, Marino IR, Chojnacki KA, Berger AC, Yeo CJ (2007) Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution–the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 204(5):917–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holland J, Carey M, Hughes N, Sweeney K, Byrne PJ, Healy M, Ravi N, Reynolds JV (2005) Intraoperative splanchnic hypoperfusion, increased intestinal permeability, down-regulation of monocyte class II major histocompatibility complex expression, exaggerated acute phase response, and sepsis. Am J Surg 190(3):393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 359(9320):1812–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lobo DN, Stanga Z, Aloysius MM, Wicks C, Nunes QM, Ingram KL, Risch L, Allison SP (2010) Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: a randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 38(2):464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srinivasa S, Taylor MH, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, MacCormick AD, Hill AG (2014) Goal-directed fluid therapy in major elective rectal surgery. Int J Surg 12(12):1467–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandstrup B, Svendsen PE, Rasmussen M, Belhage B, Rodt SÅ, Hansen B, Møller DR, Lundbech LB, Andersen N, Berg V, Thomassen N, Andersen ST, Simonsen L (2012) Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome: near-maximal stroke volume or zero fluid balance? Br J Anaesth 109(2):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinberg L, Wong D, Karalapillai D, Pearce B, Tan CO, Tay S, Christophi C, McNicol L, Nikfarjam M (2014) The impact of fluid intervention on complications and length of hospital stay after pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure). BMC Anesthesiol 14:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant FM, Protic M, Gonen M, Allen P, Brennan MF (2013) Intraoperative fluid management and complications following pancreatectomy. J Surg Oncol 107(5):529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright GP, Koehler TJ, Davis AT, Chung MH (2014) The drowning whipple: perioperative fluid balance and outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 110(4):407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Behman R, Hanna S, Coburn N, Law C, Cyr DP, Truong J, Lam-McCulloch J, McHardy P, Sawyer J, Idestrup C, Karanicolas PJ (2015) Impact of fluid resuscitation on major adverse events following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 210(5):896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eng OS, Goswami J, Moore D, Chen C, Gannon CJ, August DA, Carpizo DR (2013) Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol 108(4):242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melis M, Marcon F, Masi A, Sarpel U, Miller G, Moore H, Cohen S, Berman R, Pachter HL, Newman E (2012) Effect of intra-operative fluid volume on peri-operative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 105(1):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang S, Wang X, Dai H, Han J, Li N, Li J (2014) The effect of intraoperative fluid volume administration on pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Invest Surg 27(2):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kulemann B, Fritz M, Glatz T, Marjanovic G, Sick O, Hopt UT, Hoeppner J, Makowiec F (2017) Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with higher amounts of intra- and postoperative fluid therapy: a single center retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 27(16):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fischer M, Matsuo K, Gonen M, Grant F, Dematteo RP, D’Angelica MI, Mascarenhas J, Brennan MF, Allen PJ, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR (2010) Relationship between intraoperative fluid administration and perioperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial of acute normovolemic hemodilution compared with standard intraoperative management. Ann Surg 252(6):952–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lavu H, Sell NM, Carter TI, Winter JM, Maguire DP, Gratch DM, Berman RA, Feil MG, Grunwald Z, Leiby BE, Pequignot EC, Rosato EL, Yeo CJ (2014) The HYSLAR trial: a prospective randomized controlled trial of the use of a restrictive fluid regimen with 3% hypertonic saline versus lactated Ringers in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 260(3):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Samkar G, Eshuis WJ, Bennink RJ, van Gulik TM, Dijkgraaf MG, Preckel B, de Hert S, Gouma DJ, Hollmann MW, Busch OR (2015) Intraoperative fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery: a double blinded randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0140294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grant F, Brennan MF, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, D’Angelica M, Fischer ME, Gonen M, Zhang H, Jarnagin WR (2016) Prospective randomized controlled trial of liberal vs restricted perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 264(4):591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinberg L, Ianno D, Churilov L, Chao I, Scurrah N, Rachbuch C, Banting J, Muralidharan V, Story D, Bellomo R, Christophi C, Nikfarjam M (2017) Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0183313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, Grossman BJ, Cohn CS, Fung MK, Gernsheimer T, Holcomb JB, Kaplan LJ, Katz LM, Peterson N, Ramsey G, Rao SV, Roback JD, Shander A, Tobian AA (2016) Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA 316(19):2025–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 161(3):584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kulemann B, Timme S, Seifert G, Holzner PA, Glatz T, Sick O, Chikhladze S, Bronsert P, Hoeppner J, Werner M, Hopt UT, Marjanovic G (2013) Intraoperative crystalloid overload leads to substantial inflammatory infiltration of intestinal anastomoses-a histomorphological analysis. Surgery 154(3):596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354(24):2564–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warrillow SJ, Weinberg L, Parker F, Calzavacca P, Licari E, Aly A, Bagshaw S, Christophi C, Bellomo R (2010) Perioperative fluid prescription, complications and outcomes in major elective open gastrointestinal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 38(2):259–265Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED (2009) Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 9(6):R687–R693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Senagore AJ, Emery T, Luchtefeld M, Kim D, Dujovny N, Hoedema R (2009) Fluid management for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective, randomized assessment of goal-directed administration of balanced salt solution or hetastarch coupled with an enhanced recovery program. Dis Colon Rectum 52(12):1935–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abbas SM, Hill AG (2008) Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 63(1):44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A et al (2018) Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 378:2263–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Huang Y, Chua TC, Gill AJ, Samra JS (2017) Impact of perioperative fluid administration on early outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 3:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen BP, Chen M, Bennett S, Lemon K, Bertens KA, Balaa FK, Martel G (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of restrictive perioperative fluid management in pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 42(9):2938–2950.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4545-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McMillan MT, Vollmer CM Jr (2014) Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(7):811–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Crippa S, Salvia R, Falconi M, Butturini G, Landoni L, Bassi C (2007) Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxf.) 9(1):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reyad AR, Elkharboutly W, Wahba A, Elmorshedi M, Hasaneen NA (2013) Effect of intraoperative dobutamine on splanchnic tissue perfusion and outcome after Whipple surgery. J Crit Care 28(4):531.e7–531.e15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bellamy MC (2006) Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 97(6):755–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ (2009) Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 108(3):887–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Behman R, Hanna S, Coburn N, Law C, Cyr DP, Truong J, Lam-McCulloch J, McHardy P, Sawyer J, Idestrup C, Karanicolas PJ (2015) Impact of fluid resuscitation on major adverse events following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 210(5):896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sandini
    • 1
  • C. Fernández-del Castillo
    • 1
  • C. R. Ferrone
    • 1
  • K. J. Ruscic
    • 2
  • M. Eikermann
    • 2
  • A. L. Warshaw
    • 1
  • K. D. Lillemoe
    • 1
  • M. Qadan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations