Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
- 111 Downloads
Esophageal anastomotic leakages after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy are severe and life-threatening complications. We analyzed the outcome of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy.
Seventy patients with esophageal anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer who had received SEMS treatment between January 2006 and December 2015 at our clinic were identified in this retrospective study. The patients were analyzed according to demographic characteristics, risk factors, leakage characteristics, stent characteristics, stent-related complications, sealing success rate and mortality.
Over a 10-year period, 70 patients received SEMS as treatment for postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Technical success of esophageal stenting in anastomotic leakage was achieved in 50 out of 70 cases (71.4%). Sealing success rate was 70% (n = 49) with a median treatment of 28 days (range 7–87). In 20 patients (28.6%), stent-related complications, such as stenosis, dislocation, leakage persistence, perforation or esophagotracheal fistula occurred after the SEMS treatment. Sixty-one patients (87.1%) survived SEMS treatment of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage. Mean follow-up for all patients was 38 months (IQR 10–76), and no significant difference was found in a comparison of the long-term survival rate between patients with successful and unsuccessful SEMS treatment.
The management of esophageal anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with SEMS is effective, safe and technically feasible. Aggressive non-surgical management should be considered when developing a treatment plan for stenting.
The authors thank Lisa-Marie Teubler for proofreading the current manuscript. Furthermore, the authors also thank Helmut Schäfer for his technical expertise and his guidance as interventional endoscopist.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
- 4.Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP et al (2017) Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS (2005) Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T et al (2012) Anastomotic complications after ivor lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol 82:e513–e519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fernández A, González-Carrera V, González-Portela C et al (2015) Fully covered metal stents for the treatment of leaks after gastric and esophageal surgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 107:608–613Google Scholar
- 24.Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Schröder W et al (2011) Prognostic impact of upper, middle, and lower third mucosal or submucosal infiltration in early esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 254:802–807; discussion 807–808. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182369128
- 25.Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 26.Strauss C, Mal F, Perniceni T et al (2010) Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann Surg 251:647–651. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c1aeb8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.El Hajj II, Imperiale TF, Rex DK et al (2014) Treatment of esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations with temporary stents: evaluation of efficacy, adverse events, and factors associated with successful outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 79:589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar