Management of Appendicitis Globally Based on Income of Countries (MAGIC) Study
Our aim is to compare the management approaches and clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis according to annual Gross National Income per Capita (GNI/Capita) of countries.
Consecutive patients who were diagnosed to have acute appendicitis from 116 centers of 44 countries were prospectively studied over a 6-month period (April–September 2016). Studied variables included demography, Alvarado score, comorbidities, radiological and surgical management, histopathology, and clinical outcome. Data were divided into three groups depending on the GNI/Capita.
A total of 4271 patients having a mean (SD) age of 33.4 (17.3) years were studied. Fifty-five percent were males. Two hundred and eighty patients were from lower–middle-income (LMI) countries, 1756 were from upper–middle-income (UMI) countries, and 2235 were from high-income (HI) countries. Patients in LMI countries were significantly younger (p < 0.0001) and included more males (p < 0.0001). CT scan was done in less than 8% of cases in LMI countries, 23% in UMI countries, and 38% in HI countries. Laparoscopy was performed in 73% of the cases in the HI countries, while open appendectomy was done in more than 60% of cases in both LMI and UMI countries (p < 0.0001). The longest mean hospital stay was in the UMI group (4.84 days). There was no significant difference in the complication or death rates between the three groups. The overall death rate was 3 per 1000 patients.
There is great variation in the presentation, severity of disease, radiological workup, and surgical management of patients having acute appendicitis that is related to country income. A global effort is needed to address this variation. Individual socioeconomic status could be more important than global country socioeconomic status in predicting clinical outcome.
CAG designed the study and wrote the manuscript. FAZ defined the research question, performed the statistical analysis, prepared the graphs and figures, wrote the results section, edited the manuscript, and addressed the concerns of the reviewers. All authors participated in the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 7.The World Bank, New country classifications by income level: 2017–2018. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-country-classifications-income-level-2017-2018. Accessed 11 Dec 2017
- 8.Hernandez MC, Finnesgaard E, Aho JM et al (2017) Appendicitis: rural patient status is associated with increased duration of prehospital symptoms and worse outcomes in high- and low-middle-income countries. World J Surg 42:1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4344-5 [Epub ahead of print] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Di Saverio S, Mandrioli M, Birindelli A et al (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy with a low-cost technique and surgical-glove port: “How to do it” with comparison of the outcomes and costs in a consecutive single-operator series of 45 cases. J Am Coll Surg 222:e15–e30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.GlobalSurg Collaborative (2018) Laparoscopy in management of appendicitis in high-, middle-, and low-income countries: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Surg Endosc Apr 5 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 21.Global Forum for Health Research. The10/90 Report on Health Research 2003-2004. Global Forum for Health Research, Geneva 2004. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/17141/1090.04.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018