Prognostic Impact of Bacterobilia on Morbidity and Postoperative Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 419 Downloads
Intraoperative bile analysis during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is performed routinely at specialized centers worldwide. However, it remains controversial if and how intraoperative bacterobilia during PD affects morbidity and its management. The aim of the study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative bacterobilia and its impact on patient outcome after PD.
Five relevant outcomes of interest were defined, and a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.
A total of 28 studies (8523 patients) were included. The median incidence of bacterobilia was 58% (interquartile range 51–67%). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Enterococcus species (51%), Klebsiella species (28%), and Escherichia coli (27%). Preoperative biliary drainage was significantly associated with bacterobilia (86 vs. 25%; RR 3.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–4.42; p < 0.001). The incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) was significantly increased in cases with bacterobilia (RR 2.84; 95% CI 2.17–3.73; p < 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula, overall postoperative morbidity, and mortality were not significantly influenced. Identical bacteria in bile and the infectious sources were found in 48% (interquartile range 34–59%) of the cases.
Bacterobilia is detected during almost every second PD and is associated with an increased rate of SSI. The microbiome from intraoperative bile and postoperative infectious sources match in ~50% of patients, providing the option of early administration of calculated antibiotics and the determination of resistance patterns.
B.M. collected and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. S.H. assisted with the data collection. J.W., C.K., and M.D. worked on the final manuscript. T.W. collected and analyzed the data and finalized the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- 11.di Mola FF, Tavano F, Rago RR et al (2014) Influence of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: single centre experience. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg Deutsche Ges Chir 399:649–657Google Scholar
- 20.Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 355:i4919Google Scholar
- 24.Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2014) Perioperative antibiotics covering bile contamination prevent abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 38:2952–2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2688-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960) 144:841–847Google Scholar
- 27.Grizas S, Stakyte M, Kincius M et al (2005) Etiology of bile infection and its association with postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 41:386–391Google Scholar
- 36.Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2007) Specific antibiotic prophylaxis based on bile cultures is required to prevent postoperative infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy patients who have undergone preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 31:2230–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9210-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.McBride SJ, Upton A, Roberts SA (2010) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia—a five-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Off Public Eur Soc Clin Microbiol 29:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar