Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 2951–2962 | Cite as

Prognostic Impact of Bacterobilia on Morbidity and Postoperative Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Benjamin Müssle
  • Sebastian Hempel
  • Christoph Kahlert
  • Marius Distler
  • Jürgen Weitz
  • Thilo WelschEmail author
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative bile analysis during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is performed routinely at specialized centers worldwide. However, it remains controversial if and how intraoperative bacterobilia during PD affects morbidity and its management. The aim of the study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative bacterobilia and its impact on patient outcome after PD.

Methods

Five relevant outcomes of interest were defined, and a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of 28 studies (8523 patients) were included. The median incidence of bacterobilia was 58% (interquartile range 51–67%). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Enterococcus species (51%), Klebsiella species (28%), and Escherichia coli (27%). Preoperative biliary drainage was significantly associated with bacterobilia (86 vs. 25%; RR 3.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–4.42; p < 0.001). The incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) was significantly increased in cases with bacterobilia (RR 2.84; 95% CI 2.17–3.73; p < 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula, overall postoperative morbidity, and mortality were not significantly influenced. Identical bacteria in bile and the infectious sources were found in 48% (interquartile range 34–59%) of the cases.

Conclusions

Bacterobilia is detected during almost every second PD and is associated with an increased rate of SSI. The microbiome from intraoperative bile and postoperative infectious sources match in ~50% of patients, providing the option of early administration of calculated antibiotics and the determination of resistance patterns.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

B.M. collected and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. S.H. assisted with the data collection. J.W., C.K., and M.D. worked on the final manuscript. T.W. collected and analyzed the data and finalized the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

268_2018_4546_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (313 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 313 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937 (discussion 937–939) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamphues C, Bova R, Schricke D et al (2012) Postoperative complications deteriorate long-term outcome in pancreatic cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 19:856–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M et al (2016) Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 263:664–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Pastena M, Paiella S, Marchegiani G et al (2017) Postoperative infections represent a major determinant of outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from a high-volume center. Surgery 162:792–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S et al (2012) A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 16:89–102 (discussion 102–103) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Welsch T, Frommhold K, Hinz U et al (2008) Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications. Surgery 143:20–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE et al (2017) Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: a meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery 161:939–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC et al (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230:131–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D et al (2007) Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 142:313–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    di Mola FF, Tavano F, Rago RR et al (2014) Influence of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: single centre experience. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg Deutsche Ges Chir 399:649–657Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F et al (2006) Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 202:93–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sivaraj SM, Vimalraj V, Saravanaboopathy P et al (2010) Is bactibilia a predictor of poor outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy? Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 9:65–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isla AM, Griniatsos J, Riaz A et al (2007) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies: the effect of bile colonization on the postoperative outcome. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg Deutsche Ges Chir 392:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gregg JA, De Girolami P, Carr-Locke DL (1985) Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct. Am J Surg 149:668–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herzog T, Belyaev O, Muller CA et al (2009) Bacteribilia after preoperative bile duct stenting: a prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:457–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nomura T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K (2000) Enterococcal bactibilia in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 45:2183–2186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 355:i4919Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohgi K, Sugiura T, Yamamoto Y et al (2016) Bacterobilia may trigger the development and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 160:725–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al (2009) A matched case-control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 13:2163–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fujii T, Yamada S, Suenaga M et al (2015) Preoperative internal biliary drainage increases the risk of bile juice infection and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective observational study. Pancreas 44:465–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2014) Perioperative antibiotics covering bile contamination prevent abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 38:2952–2959.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2688-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morris-Stiff G, Tamijmarane A, Tan YM et al (2011) Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 9:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960) 144:841–847Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grizas S, Stakyte M, Kincius M et al (2005) Etiology of bile infection and its association with postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 41:386–391Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande S et al (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scheufele F, Aichinger L, Jager C et al (2017) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on bacterial flora in bile of patients with periampullary cancer. Br J Surg 104:e182–e188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Herzog T, Belyaev O, Akkuzu R et al (2015) The impact of bile duct cultures on surgical site infections in pancreatic surgery. Surg Infect 16:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cammann S, Timrott K, Vonberg RP et al (2016) Cholangitis in the postoperative course after biliodigestive anastomosis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg Deutsche Ges Chir 401:715–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sahora K, Morales-Oyarvide V, Ferrone C et al (2016) Preoperative biliary drainage does not increase major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a large single center experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 23:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G et al (2013) Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 15:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Augenstein VA, Reuter NP, Bower MR et al (2010) Bile cultures: a guide to infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 102:478–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lermite E, Pessaux P, Teyssedou C et al (2008) Effect of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on infectious morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-control study. Am J Surg 195:442–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2007) Specific antibiotic prophylaxis based on bile cultures is required to prevent postoperative infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy patients who have undergone preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 31:2230–2235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9210-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Howard TJ, Yu J, Greene RB et al (2006) Influence of bactibilia after preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative infectious complications. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 10:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karsten TM, Allema JH, Reinders M et al (1996) Preoperative biliary drainage, colonisation of bile and postoperative complications in patients with tumours of the pancreatic head: a retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients. Eur J Surg Acta chirurgica 162:881–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL et al (1999) The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:725–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rerknimitr R, Fogel EL, Kalayci C et al (2002) Microbiology of bile in patients with cholangitis or cholestasis with and without plastic biliary endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc 56:885–889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Melzer M, Toner R, Lacey S et al (2007) Biliary tract infection and bacteraemia: presentation, structural abnormalities, causative organisms and clinical outcomes. Postgrad Med J 83:773–776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    den Hoed PT, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF et al (1998) Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp Infect 39:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hambraeus A, Laurell G, Nybacka O et al (1990) Biliary tract surgery: a bacteriologic and epidemiologic study. Acta Chir Scand 156:155–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kwon W, Jang JY, Kim EC et al (2013) Changing trend in bile microbiology and antibiotic susceptibilities: over 12 years of experience. Infection 41:93–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McBride SJ, Upton A, Roberts SA (2010) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia—a five-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Off Public Eur Soc Clin Microbiol 29:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Caballero-Granado FJ, Becerril B, Cuberos L et al (2001) Attributable mortality rate and duration of hospital stay associated with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 32:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fong ZV, McMillan MT, Marchegiani G et al (2016) Discordance between perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound infection cultures in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 151:432–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gavazzi F, Ridolfi C, Capretti G et al (2016) Role of preoperative biliary stents, bile contamination and antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 16:43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu C, Lu JW, Du ZQ et al (2015) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:796893PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mohammed S, Evans C, VanBuren G et al (2014) Treatment of bacteriobilia decreases wound infection rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 16:592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ngu W, Jones M, Neal CP et al (2013) Preoperative biliary drainage for distal biliary obstruction and post-operative infectious complications. ANZ J Surg 83:280–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Singhirunnusorn J, Roger L, Chopin-Laly X et al (2013) Value of preoperative biliary drainage in a consecutive series of resectable periampullary lesions. From randomized studies to real medical practice. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg Deutsche Ges Chir 398:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Müssle
    • 1
  • Sebastian Hempel
    • 1
  • Christoph Kahlert
    • 1
  • Marius Distler
    • 1
  • Jürgen Weitz
    • 1
  • Thilo Welsch
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations